Radiotherapy as nose preservation treatment strategy for cancer of the nasal vestibule: The Dutch experience

被引:21
作者
Czerwinski, Michal D. [1 ]
Jansen, Peter P. [2 ]
Zwijnenburg, Ellen M. [1 ]
Al-Mamgani, Abrahim [3 ]
Vergeer, Marije R. [4 ]
Langendijk, Johannes A. [5 ]
Wesseling, Frederik W. R. [6 ]
Kaanders, Johannes H. A. M. [1 ]
Verhoef, Cornelia G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Radiat Oncol, Med Ctr, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC, Dept Radiat Oncol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Netherlands Canc Inst Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Dept Radiat Oncol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Radiat Oncol, Med Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Radiat Oncol, Groningen, Netherlands
[6] Maastricht Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Med Ctr MAASTRO, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
Radiotherapy; Brachytherapy; Head and neck cancer; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; RADIATION-THERAPY; INTERVENTIONAL RADIOTHERAPY; INTERSTITIAL BRACHYTHERAPY; STAGE; RECONSTRUCTION; CAVITY; HEAD;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2021.08.018
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: Primary radiotherapy is often preferred for early-stage cancer of the nasal vestibule (CNV), combining high disease control with preservation of nasal anatomy. However, due to practice variation and an absence of comparative trials, no consensus exists on preference for brachytherapy (BT) or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). We compared these modalities in terms of disease control, nose preservation rates and toxicity. Materials and methods: Medical records of 225 patients with T1-T2 squamous cell carcinoma of the nasal vestibule treated with 3D image-guided primary radiotherapy between Jan 2010 and Dec 2016 in 6 Dutch institutions were reviewed retrospectively. Results: 153 of 225 patients were treated with BT, 65 with EBRT and 7 with other modalities. Median follow-up was 46 months. Overall 3-year local control (LC) and regional control (RC) were 87% and 89%. Five-year disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) were 94% and 82%. Three-year survival with preserved nose (SPN) was 76%. BT provided higher 3-year LC (95% vs 71%, p < 0.01) and SPN compared with EBRT (82% vs 61%, p < 0.01). Multivariable and propensity-score-matched cohort analyses confirmed better outcomes after BT. No difference was seen in DSS or OS. Five-year incidence of CTCAE 5.0 grade >2 toxicity was higher after BT (20% vs 3%, p = 0.03) and consisted mostly of radiation ulcers. 50% of all late toxicity recovered. Conclusion: In this largest-to-date multicenter analysis of T1-T2 CNV, BT achieved superior LC and SPN compared with EBRT. Grade 1-2 radiation ulcers occurred more frequently after brachytherapy, but were transient in half the cases. Considering these results, BT can be recommended as first-line treatment for T1-T2 CNV. (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. Radiotherapy and Oncology 164 (2021) 20-26 This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:20 / 26
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[11]   T stage as prognostic factor in irradiated localized squamous cell carcinoma of the nasal vestibule [J].
Kummer, E ;
Rasch, CRN ;
Keus, RB ;
Tan, IB ;
Balm, AJM .
HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2002, 24 (03) :268-273
[12]   Radiotherapy of squamous cell carcinoma of the nasal vestibule [J].
Langendijk, JA ;
Poorter, R ;
Leemans, CR ;
De Bree, R ;
Doornaert, P ;
Slotman, BJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 59 (05) :1319-1325
[13]   Interstitial radiation therapy for early-stage nasal vestibule cancer: A continuing quest for optimal tumor control and cosmesis [J].
Levendag, Peter C. ;
Nijdam, Wideke M. ;
van Moolenburgh, Sanne E. ;
Tan, Lisa ;
Noever, Inge ;
van Rooy, Peter ;
Mureau, Marc A. M. ;
Jansen, Peter P. ;
Munte, Kai ;
Hofer, Stefan O. P. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 66 (01) :160-169
[14]   Outcome and toxicity profile after brachytherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the nasal vestibule [J].
Lipman, Djoeri ;
Verhoef, Lia C. ;
Takes, Robert P. ;
Kaanders, Johannes H. ;
Janssens, Geert O. .
HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2015, 37 (09) :1297-1303
[15]   Validation of a questionnaire assessing patient's aesthetic and functional outcome after nasal reconstruction: the patient NAFEQ-score [J].
Moolenburgh, S. E. ;
Mureau, M. A. M. ;
Duivenvoorden, H. J. ;
Hofer, S. O. P. .
JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2009, 62 (05) :656-662
[16]   The impact of nasal reconstruction following tumour resection on psychosocial functioning, a clinical-empirical exploration [J].
Moolenburgh, Sanne E. ;
Mureau, Marc A. M. ;
Versnel, Sarah L. ;
Duivenvoorden, Hugo J. ;
Hofer, Stefan O. P. .
PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2009, 18 (07) :747-752
[17]  
Mukai Y, 2017, STRAHLENTHER ONKOL, V193, P295, DOI 10.1007/s00066-016-1083-8
[18]   Regional recurrence of squamous cell carcinoma of the nasal cavity - A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Scurry, W. Cooper, Jr. ;
Goldenberg, David ;
Chee, Michael Y. ;
Lengerich, EugeneJ. ;
Liu, Yihai ;
Fedok, Fred G. .
ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2007, 133 (08) :796-800
[19]   Interventional radiotherapy as exclusive treatment for primary nasal vestibule cancer: single-institution experience [J].
Tagliaferri, Luca ;
Carra, Nadia ;
Lancellotta, Valentina ;
Rizzo, Davide ;
Casa, Calogero ;
Mattiucci, Giancarlo ;
Parrilla, Claudio ;
Fionda, Bruno ;
Deodato, Francesco ;
Cornacchione, Patrizia ;
Gambacorta, Maria ;
Paludetti, Gaetano ;
Valentini, Vincenzo ;
Bussu, Francesco .
JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2020, 12 (05) :413-419
[20]   LYMPH NODE METASTASIS IN NASAL VESTIBULE CANCER: A REVIEW [J].
Talmi, Yoav P. ;
Ferlito, Alfio ;
Takes, Robert P. ;
Strojan, Primoz ;
Langendijk, Johannes A. ;
Shaha, Ashok R. ;
Rinaldo, Alessandra .
HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2011, 33 (12) :1783-1788