Accounting for soil biotic effects on soil health and crop productivity in the design of crop rotations

被引:157
作者
Dias, Teresa [1 ,2 ]
Dukes, Angela [1 ]
Antunes, Pedro M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Algoma Univ, Sault Ste Marie, ON P6A 2G4, Canada
[2] Sault Ste Marie Innovat Ctr, Sault Ste Marie, ON P6A 2G4, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
crop rotations; productivity; environment; soil health; soil microorganisms; plant-soil feedback; PLANT-GROWTH; BIOLOGICAL-CONTROL; SYSTEM MANAGEMENT; NITROGEN; INOCULATION; FEEDBACK; BIODIVERSITY; RHIZOSPHERE; ACQUISITION; RESISTANCE;
D O I
10.1002/jsfa.6565
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
There is an urgent need for novel agronomic improvements capable of boosting crop yields while alleviating environmental impacts. One such approach is the use of optimized crop rotations. However, a set of measurements that can serve as guiding principles for the design of crop rotations is lacking. Crop rotations take advantage of niche complementarity, enabling the optimization of nutrient use and the reduction of pests and specialist pathogen loads. However, despite the recognized importance of plant-soil microbial interactions and feedbacks for crop yield and soil health, this is ignored in the selection and management of crops for rotation systems. We review the literature and propose criteria for the design of crop rotations focusing on the roles of soil biota and feedback on crop productivity and soil health. We consider that identifying specific key organisms or consortia capable of influencing plant productivity is more important as a predictor of soil health and crop productivity than assessing the overall soil microbial diversity per se. As such, we propose that setting up soil feedback studies and applying genetic sequencing tools towards the development of soil biotic community databases has a strong potential to enable the establishment of improved soil health indicators for optimized crop rotations. (c) 2014 Society of Chemical Industry
引用
收藏
页码:447 / 454
页数:8
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   Suitability of arable weeds as indicator organisms to evaluate species conservation effects of management in agricultural ecosystems [J].
Albrecht, H .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 98 (1-3) :201-211
[2]   Soil fertility management and insect pests: harmonizing soil and plant health in agroecosystems [J].
Altieri, MA ;
Nicholls, CI .
SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2003, 72 (02) :203-211
[3]   Multiple objective linear programming for environmental farm planning [J].
Annetts, JE ;
Audsley, E .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2002, 53 (09) :933-943
[4]  
Antunes PM, 2013, SOIL ECOLOGY AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, P153
[5]   MICROBIAL-PRODUCTION OF PLANT HORMONES [J].
ARSHAD, M ;
FRANKENBERGER, WT .
PLANT AND SOIL, 1991, 133 (01) :1-8
[6]   ROTOR, a tool for generating and evaluating crop rotations for organic farming systems [J].
Bachinger, Johann ;
Zander, Peter .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2007, 26 (02) :130-143
[7]   Relating preseason soil nitrogen to maize yield in tree legume-maize rotations [J].
Barrios, E ;
Kwesiga, F ;
Buresh, RJ ;
Sprent, JI ;
Coe, R .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1998, 62 (06) :1604-1609
[8]   Herbicide-resistant weeds: Management tactics and practices [J].
Beckie, Hugh J. .
WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 20 (03) :793-814
[9]  
Bennett AE, 2007, ECOLOGY, V88, P210, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2007)88[210:MSDAPG]2.0.CO
[10]  
2