Conversion of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Results of a Retrospective Multicenter Study

被引:7
作者
Antonopulos, Christos [1 ]
Rebibo, Lionel [1 ,2 ]
Calabrese, Daniela [1 ,2 ]
Coupaye, Muriel [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ledoux, Severine [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Msika, Simon [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hop Bichat Claude Bernard, APHP 7, Serv Chirurg Digest Oesogastr & Bariatr, F-75018 Paris, France
[2] Univ Paris, INSERM, UMR 1149, F-75018 Paris, France
[3] Hop Louis Mourier, APHP 7, Serv Explorat Fonct, Ctr Integre Prise Charge Obesite CINFO, F-92700 Colombes, France
[4] Univ Paris, F-92700 Colombes, France
关键词
One anastomosis gastric bypass; Revisional surgery; Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; Weight loss; TERM-FOLLOW-UP; SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY; COMPLICATIONS; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1007/s11695-022-05963-8
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) may expose the patient to certain specific complications. Here, we report the results of conversion of OAGB to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in terms of outcomes and weight loss. Methods Between January 2009 and January 2019, all patients undergoing conversion of OAGB to RYGB because of complications due to OAGB (n = 23) were included. The primary efficacy endpoint was the effectiveness of converting OAGB to RYGB. The secondary endpoints were overall mortality and morbidity during the first 3 postoperative months, specific morbidity, reoperation, length of hospitalization, weight loss, and progression of comorbidities related to obesity at 2-year follow-up. Results Indications for conversion were bile reflux (n = 14; 60.9%), severe malnutrition (n = 3; 13%), gastro-gastric fistula (n = 4; 17.4%), and anastomotic leak (n = 2; 8.7%). The median time interval between OAGB and conversion to RYGB was 34 months (0-158). At the time of RYGB, median body mass index (BMI) was 28.0 kg/m(2) (18.2-50.7), representing a median BMI change of 14.0 (- 1.7-43.5). Fifteen surgeries (65.1%) were completed laparoscopically. Five complications (21.7%) were recorded, including 2 major ones (8.7%). Reoperation rate was 4.3% (n = 1). At 24 months of follow-up (n = 18; 78.3%), median BMI was 28.7 kg/m(2) (19.4-35.4), representing a median BMI change of 19.5 (12.2-43.1). No patient complained of bile reflux or persistent malnutrition. Conclusion RYGB performed as revisional surgery for complications after OAGB is an effective procedure with no major weight regain at 2 years of follow-up.
引用
收藏
页码:1842 / 1848
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Efficiency and risks of laparoscopic conversion of omega anastomosis gastric bypass to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass [J].
Bolckmans, Roel ;
Arman, Gustavo ;
Himpens, Jacques .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 33 (08) :2572-2582
[2]   Bariatric surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Buchwald, H ;
Avidor, Y ;
Braunwald, E ;
Jensen, MD ;
Pories, W ;
Fahrbach, K ;
Schoelles, K .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 292 (14) :1724-1737
[3]   Laparoscopic One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: Technique, Results, and Long-Term Follow-Up in 1200 Patients [J].
Carbajo, Miguel A. ;
Luque-de-Leon, Enrique ;
Jimenez, Jose M. ;
Ortiz-de-Solorzano, Javier ;
Perez-Miranda, Manuel ;
Castro-Alija, Maria J. .
OBESITY SURGERY, 2017, 27 (05) :1153-1167
[4]   ESPEN guidelines on definitions and terminology of clinical nutrition [J].
Cederholm, T. ;
Barazzoni, R. ;
Austin, P. ;
Ballmer, P. ;
Biolo, G. ;
Bischoff, S. C. ;
Compher, C. ;
Correia, I. ;
Higashiguchi, T. ;
Hoist, M. ;
Jensen, G. L. ;
Malone, A. ;
Muscaritoli, M. ;
Nyulasi, I. ;
Pirlich, M. ;
Rothenberg, E. ;
Schindler, K. ;
Schneider, S. M. ;
de van der Schueren, M. A. E. ;
Sieber, C. ;
Valentini, L. i ;
Yu, J. C. ;
Van Gossum, A. ;
Singer, P. .
CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2017, 36 (01) :49-64
[5]   Laparoscopic Conversion of Gastric Bypass Complication to Sleeve Gastrectomy: Technique and Early Results [J].
Chen, Chung-Yen ;
Lee, Wei-Jei ;
Lee, Hui-Ming ;
Chen, Jung-Chien ;
Ser, Kong-Han ;
Lee, Yi-Chih ;
Chen, Shu-Chun .
OBESITY SURGERY, 2016, 26 (09) :2014-2021
[6]   Mini Gastric Bypass-One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (MGB-OAGB)-IFSO Position Statement [J].
De Luca, Maurizio ;
Tie, Tiffany ;
Ooi, Geraldine ;
Higa, Kelvin ;
Himpens, Jacques ;
Carbajo, Miguel-A ;
Mahawar, Kamal ;
Shikora, Scott ;
Brown, Wendy A. .
OBESITY SURGERY, 2018, 28 (05) :1188-1206
[7]   Classification of surgical complications - A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey [J].
Dindo, D ;
Demartines, N ;
Clavien, PA .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (02) :205-213
[8]   Thirty-day outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: first report based on Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database [J].
El Chaar, Maher ;
Lundberg, Peter ;
Stoltzfus, Jill .
SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2018, 14 (05) :545-551
[9]   Hypoabsorption Not Malabsorption, Hypoabsorptive Surgery and Not Malabsorptive Surgery [J].
Gagner, Michel .
OBESITY SURGERY, 2016, 26 (11) :2783-2784
[10]   Laparoscopic reversal of mini-gastric bypass to original anatomy for severe postoperative malnutrition [J].
Genser, Laurent ;
Soprani, Antoine ;
Tabbara, Malek ;
Siksik, Jean-Michel ;
Cady, Jean ;
Carandina, Sergio .
LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2017, 402 (08) :1263-1270