Soil quality indicators - From soil functions to ecosystem services

被引:116
作者
Drobnik, Thomas [1 ]
Greiner, Lucie [2 ]
Keller, Armin [2 ]
Gret-Regamey, Adrienne [1 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Planning Landscape & Urban Syst PLUS, Stefano Franscini Pl 5, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Agroscope Reckenholz Tanikon ART, Reckenholzstr 191, CH-8046 Zurich, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Soil quality index; Ecosystem services; Spatial decision-making; Trade-off assessment; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; SCIENCE; CLASSIFICATION; FRAMEWORK; CONFLICTS; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.052
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Soils provide a broad set of vital ecosystem services (ES), yet soils are under threat worldwide. To avoid further degradation of soils and, in consequence, provision of soil-based ES, soil science has been calling for a comprehensive consideration of soil quality in decision-making, as soils are marginalized as a mere surface. Although a myriad of soil quality indicators exist, their disciplinary focus complicates discussion of conflicting soil uses. We present a novel approach to base soil quality not on soil function assessment alone but on a soil's ability to support various ES. The soil quality index SQUID (Soil Quality InDicator) links a set of ten different soil functions to various ESs using an expert-based Delphi approach. We apply it to ten suburban municipalities in the Canton of Zurich, Switzerland, where fast development of urban structures has led to significant loss of fertile soils over the last two decades. To estimate the potential and the problems of the SQUID index, we compare it to an established soil quality index designed for spatial planning (BOKS - soil concept Stuttgart). Results suggest that SQUID is at a disadvantage for general overviews, but can be highly useful when detailed trade-off assessments are required. We conclude that the SQUID index might be a promising approach to better integrate soil quality into decision-making, as it has the potential to overcome disciplinary boundaries and to foster trade-off discussions between different, possibly conflicting soil use interests.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 169
页数:19
相关论文
共 92 条
  • [1] Linking soils to ecosystem services - A global review
    Adhikari, Kabindra
    Hartemink, Alfred E.
    [J]. GEODERMA, 2016, 262 : 101 - 111
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2015, Status of the World's Soil Resources
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and human well-being: Desertification synthesis, DOI DOI 10.1196/ANNALS.1439.003
  • [4] [Anonymous], SPATIAL ANAL MODELLI
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2010, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
  • [6] Identifying critical limits for soil quality indicators in agro-ecosystems
    Arshad, MA
    Martin, S
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 88 (02) : 153 - 160
  • [7] Past, present and future of soil quality indices: A biological perspective
    Bastida, F.
    Zsolnay, A.
    Hernandez, T.
    Garcia, C.
    [J]. GEODERMA, 2008, 147 (3-4) : 159 - 171
  • [8] An analytical framework to discuss the usability of (environmental) indicators for policy
    Bauler, Tom
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2012, 17 : 38 - 45
  • [9] Bechler K, 2010, ASSESSMENT SOILS CAP
  • [10] Beddington J., 2012, ACHIEVING FOOD SECUR