Pecking order theory and church debt financing: Evidence from the United Methodist church

被引:4
作者
Su, Min [1 ]
Yan, Wenli [2 ]
Harvey, Nicholas [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Publ Adm, 501 South Quad Dr,3045 Business Educ Complex, Baton Rouge, LA 70808 USA
[2] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Wilder Sch Govt & Publ Affairs, Richmond, VA USA
[3] Georgia State Univ, Dept Publ Management & Policy, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[4] Nick Harvey Consulting, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
church capital structure; church debt; financial transparency; information asymmetry; pecking order theory; CAPITAL STRUCTURE; NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS; REVENUE DIVERSIFICATION; CONGREGATIONS; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1002/nml.21509
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In the United States, religious congregations, as an important subset of the nonprofit sector, attract the most civic participation. Unlike other tax-exempt organizations, churches do not file the annual tax informational Form 990 to the Internal Revenue Service, following the traditional notion of separation of church and state. Due to such an exemption, the church financial market exhibits a more severe information asymmetry problem than the corporate or nonprofit financial markets. The pecking order theory in corporate finance postulates that information asymmetry increases external financing costs, resulting in organizations demonstrating a pecking order of preference: internal funding first, then debt, and lastly, equity. This article presents the first known attempt in examining the pecking order theory in the context of church organizations, which is a large but opaque subset of nonprofit organizations. By examining the revenue and capital structures of over 30,000 United Methodist churches from 2005 to 2018, we find evidence that supports a pecking order in church mortgage loan borrowing. This study increases our understanding of church finance and congregational capital structure. It highlights the value of transparency in the church capital market and fills a significant gap in both the nonprofit finance research and the religious sector literature.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 201
页数:23
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   MARKET FOR LEMONS - QUALITY UNCERTAINTY AND MARKET MECHANISM [J].
AKERLOF, GA .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1970, 84 (03) :488-500
[2]  
Allison Paul D., 2009, FIXED EFFECTS REGRES
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, FBI News
[4]   Elasticities and the Inverse Hyperbolic Sine Transformation [J].
Bellemare, Marc F. ;
Wichman, Casey J. .
OXFORD BULLETIN OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2020, 82 (01) :50-61
[5]   Defining Faith-Based Organizations and Understanding Them Through Research [J].
Bielefeld, Wolfgang ;
Cleveland, William Suhs .
NONPROFIT AND VOLUNTARY SECTOR QUARTERLY, 2013, 42 (03) :442-467
[6]  
Bowman W., 2002, NONPROFIT MANAGEMENT, V12, P293
[7]  
Burkett Larry., 1987, Answers To Your Family's Financial Questions
[8]   Testing Competing Capital Structure Theories of Nonprofit Organizations [J].
Calabrese, Thad D. .
PUBLIC BUDGETING AND FINANCE, 2011, 31 (03) :119-143
[9]   Religious Capital and Intergenerational Transmission of Volunteering as Correlates of Civic Engagement [J].
Caputo, Richard K. .
NONPROFIT AND VOLUNTARY SECTOR QUARTERLY, 2009, 38 (06) :983-1002
[10]   Revenue Diversification in Nonprofit Organizations: Does it Lead to Financial Stability? [J].
Carroll, Deborah A. ;
Stater, Keely Jones .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2009, 19 (04) :947-966