Life cycle assessment of bioethanol from corn stover from soil phytoremediation

被引:19
作者
Mata, Teresa M. [1 ]
Rodrigues, Sara [2 ,3 ]
Caetano, Nidia S. [2 ,3 ]
Martins, Antonio A. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Inst Sci & Innovat Mech & Ind Engn, INEGI, R Dr Roberto Frias 400, P-4200465 Porto, Portugal
[2] Univ Porto FEUP, Fac Engn, LEPABE Lab Proc Engn Environm Biotechnol & Energy, R Dr Roberto Frias S N, P-4200465 Porto, Portugal
[3] Univ Porto, Fac Engn, ALiCE Associate Lab Chem Engn, Rua Dr Roberto Frias, P-4200465 Porto, Portugal
关键词
Acid pre-treatment; Agriculture residues; Bioethanol; Enzymatic hydrolysis; Life cycle Assessment; Lignocellulosic biomass; ENZYMATIC-HYDROLYSIS; ETHANOL; STRAW; FUEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.059
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Bioethanol is the most widely used biofuel in the world. Bioethanol production from biomass is a way to reduce crude oil consumption and the environmental pollution. This work aims to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of bioethanol production from corn stover obtained from phytoremediation, comparing four different acids (Sulfuric, Nitric, Hydrochloric and Acetic acids) to perform the biomass pre-treatment. The study follows a life cycle thinking perspective, accounting for all the life cycle stages from corn stover grinding, to biomass pre-treatment, enzymatic hydrolysis, fermentation, filtration and ethanol distillation, on a "gate-to-gate" approach. The life cycle inventory was developed using mainly primary data from laboratorial experiments, and complemented whenever necessary with information from literature and from the Ecoinvent V3.0 database available in the SimaPro 8.0.2 software. For the environmental impact assessment, the ILCD Midpoint 2011 methodology was used. Results show that in general, the sulfuric and hydrochloric acids have a better environmental performance than the acetic and nitric acids. Also, results show that pre-treatment, followed by enzymatic hydrolysis are the process steps with the highest relative contribution to the potential environmental impacts. Thus, an improvement analysis should focus on these process steps, for example to reduce fossil energy consumption by implementing renewable energy sources. (C) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:468 / 474
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Enzymatic hydrolysis of dissolved corn stalk hemicelluloses: reaction kinetics and modeling [J].
Belkacemi, K ;
Hamoudi, S .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2003, 78 (07) :802-808
[2]   Environmental life cycle assessment of bioethanol production from wheat straw [J].
Borrion, Aiduan Li ;
McManus, Marcelle C. ;
Hammond, Geoffrey P. .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2012, 47 :9-19
[3]   Enzymatic hydrolysis of maize straw polysaccharides for the production of reducing sugars [J].
Chen, Ming ;
Zhao, Jing ;
Xia, Liming .
CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS, 2008, 71 (03) :411-415
[4]   Bioethanol from cellulosic materials: A renewable motor fuel from biomass [J].
Demirbas, A .
ENERGY SOURCES, 2005, 27 (04) :327-337
[5]  
European Union, 2012, CHARACTERISATION FAC
[6]   Response surface optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis of Cistus ladanifer and Cytisus striatus for bioethanol production [J].
Ferreira, Susana ;
Duarte, Ana P. ;
Ribeiro, Maria H. L. ;
Queiroz, Joao A. ;
Domingues, Fernanda C. .
BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2009, 45 (03) :192-200
[7]  
Hakeem KR., 2015, Biomass Bioenergy Appl, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-07578-5
[8]  
ISO, 2006, 14044 ISO
[9]  
ISO (International Organization for Standardization), 2006, ISO 14044:2006)
[10]   Environmental aspects of ethanol derived from no-tilled corn grain: nonrenewable energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions [J].
Kim, S ;
Dale, BE .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2005, 28 (05) :475-489