Corporate Social Responsibility, the Atmospheric Environment, and Technological Innovation Investment

被引:27
作者
Zhou, Guichuan [1 ]
Zhang, Lan [1 ]
Zhang, Liming [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Business Sch, Chengdu 610065, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
corporate social responsibility; atmospheric environment; technological innovation investment; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; COMPETITIVENESS; REGULATIONS; POLLUTION; QUALITY; GREEN;
D O I
10.3390/su11020481
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Based on the stakeholder theory, this paper takes the 2016 data of China's A-share listed enterprises as a sample. It then uses SPSS 22 to conduct statistical analyses on the sample data to study the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and technological innovation investment, particularly the role of the atmospheric environment in regulating the relationship between the two. This paper shows that there is a significant positive correlation between CSR and an enterprise's technological innovation investment. Further research has found that in the case of a poor atmospheric environment, the government's environmental regulations have increased the operating costs of enterprises and weakened the intensity of technological innovation investment. However, when there is public pressure, CSR will improve. Consequently, the correlation between CSR and technological innovation investment is weak. In the case of a good atmospheric environment, enterprises do not need to increase their operating costs. To establish a good image and increase profitability, enterprises lean towards fulfilling their social responsibilities and enhancing their investment in technological innovation. This will also boost the positive correlation between CSR and technological innovation investment.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   How Corporate Social Responsibility Helps MNEs to Improve their Reputation. The Moderating Effects of Geographical Diversification and Operating in Developing Regions [J].
Aguilera-Caracuel, Javier ;
Guerrero-Villegas, Jaime .
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 25 (04) :355-372
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, CORP SOC RESP ENV MA, DOI DOI 10.1002/csr.1382
[3]  
Borger F. G., 2006, International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, V6, P399, DOI 10.1504/IJTPM.2006.011724
[4]   DOES IT PAY TO BE DIFFERENT? AN ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CORPORATE SOCIAL AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE [J].
Brammer, Stephen ;
Millington, Andrew .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2008, 29 (12) :1325-1343
[5]   The contribution of environmental regulation to technological innovation and quality competitiveness An empirical study based on Chinese manufacturing enterprises [J].
Cao, Yuhong ;
You, Jianxin .
CHINESE MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2017, 11 (01) :51-71
[6]   Strategic management implications for the adoption of technological innovations in agricultural tractor: the role of scale factors and environmental attitude [J].
Cavallo, Eugenio ;
Ferrari, E. ;
Bollani, L. ;
Coccia, M. .
TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2014, 26 (07) :765-779
[7]   Management innovation enters the game: Re-considering the link between technological innovation and financial performance [J].
Cerne, Matej ;
Jaklic, Marko ;
Skerlavaj, Miha .
INNOVATION-ORGANIZATION & MANAGEMENT, 2015, 17 (04) :429-449
[8]  
주성래, 2015, [The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 복식문화연구], V23, P644, DOI 10.7741/rjcc.2015.23.4.644
[9]   THE CHANGING BASIS OF ECONOMIC RESPONSIBILITY I. FORECAST OF THE ARGUMENT [J].
Clark, J. Maurice .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1916, 24 (03) :209-229
[10]   A STAKEHOLDER FRAMEWORK FOR ANALYZING AND EVALUATING CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE [J].
CLARKSON, MBE .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1995, 20 (01) :92-117