The impact of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy on sexuality and quality of life in women with breast cancer

被引:4
|
作者
Tucker, Paige E. [1 ,2 ]
Cohen, Paul A. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Bulsara, Max K. [4 ]
Jeffares, Stephanie [1 ]
Saunders, Christobel [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] St John God Hosp, Bendat Family Comprehens Canc Ctr, 12 Salvado Rd, Subiaco, WA 6008, Australia
[2] Univ Notre Dame Australia, Sch Med, 21 Henry St, Fremantle, WA 6160, Australia
[3] Univ Western Australia, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Div Obstet & Gynaecol, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
[4] Univ Notre Dame Australia, Inst Hlth Res, 32 Mouat St, Fremantle, WA 6160, Australia
[5] Univ Western Australia, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Div Surg, 35 Stirling Hwy, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
关键词
Breast cancer; Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy; Sexuality; Aromatase inhibitor; Mastectomy; Survivorship; ADJUVANT ENDOCRINE THERAPY; FUNCTION INDEX FSFI; DYSFUNCTION; QUESTIONNAIRE; SF-36;
D O I
10.1007/s00520-020-05503-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective To compare sexual function and quality of life (QoL) in breast cancer survivors with and without a history of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO). Methods A cross-sectional study of breast cancer survivors treated at a tertiary referral hospital in Western Australia. The Female Sexual Function Index was used to determine rates of female sexual dysfunction (FSD) and hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD). Participants also completed the Relationship Assessment Scale, Menopause-specific quality of life questionnaire and Short Form Health Survey-36. Results A total of 427 women were invited to participate: 119 had undergone BSO and 308 were controls with at least one ovary remaining. A total of 172 women participated (overall response rate 40.3%), consisting of 76 women in the BSO group (response rate 63.9%) and 96 women with at least one ovary remaining (response rate 31.2%). There was no difference in FSD between the two groups: 63/76 (82.9%) women who had undergone BSO had FSD compared to 75/96 (78.1%) controls (p = 0.458). No difference in HSDD was observed (p = 0.084) between the BSO group 70/76 (96.0%) and the controls 96/96 (100%). Women who had undergone BSO had lower general health scores compared to the control group (p = 0.034). Both groups had similar energy levels, emotional well-being, pain scores, physical functioning levels and social functioning levels. Conclusions In this study, women with prior treatment for breast cancer had high levels of FSD and HSDD, irrespective of whether they had undergone BSO. Both groups reported similar sexual function scores and QoL.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 375
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Quality of life and sexuality among women with breast cancer:: the impact of surgery and hormonotherapy
    Dupont, A.
    Antoine, P.
    Reich, M.
    Beve, C.
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGIE, 2007, 1 (03) : 174 - 178
  • [22] Cost effectiveness of bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy
    Schrauder, Michael G.
    Brunel-Geuder, Lisa
    Haeberle, Lothar
    Wunderle, Marius
    Hoyer, Juliane
    Csorba, Roland
    Reis, Andre
    Schulz-Wendtland, Ruediger
    Beckmann, Matthias W.
    Lux, Michael P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 24 (01)
  • [23] Unnecessary bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy and potential for ovarian preservation
    Wong, Jellena
    Murji, Ally
    Sunderji, Zahra
    Chow, Ovina
    Shapiro, Jodi
    Wolfman, Wendy
    Shirreff, Lindsay
    MENOPAUSE-THE JOURNAL OF THE NORTH AMERICAN MENOPAUSE SOCIETY, 2021, 28 (01): : 8 - 11
  • [24] Cost effectiveness of bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy
    Michael G. Schrauder
    Lisa Brunel-Geuder
    Lothar Häberle
    Marius Wunderle
    Juliane Hoyer
    Roland Csorba
    André Reis
    Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland
    Matthias W. Beckmann
    Michael P. Lux
    European Journal of Medical Research, 24
  • [25] Prophylactic and Risk-Reducing Bilateral Salpingo-oophorectomy Recommendations Based on Risk of Ovarian Cancer
    Berek, Jonathan S.
    Chalas, Eva
    Edelson, Mitchell
    Moore, David H.
    Burke, William M.
    Cliby, William A.
    Berchuck, Andrew
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 116 (03) : 733 - 743
  • [26] The effects of pre-operative menopausal status and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on sexuality and quality of life after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy
    Tucker, Paige E.
    Bulsara, Max K.
    Salfinger, Stuart G.
    Tan, Jason Jit-Sun
    Green, Helena
    Cohen, Paul A.
    MATURITAS, 2016, 85 : 42 - 48
  • [27] Prophylactic mastectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review of postsurgical sexual function and menopausal hormone therapy symptom mitigation
    Morgan, Orly
    Belda, Rocio
    Schnur, Julie
    Montgomery, Guy
    Parmar, Shivangi
    Chirivella, Isabel
    Cano, Antonio
    SEXUAL MEDICINE REVIEWS, 2023, 12 (01) : 3 - 13
  • [28] Risk-reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy in Women at Higher Risk of Ovarian and Breast Cancer: A Single Institution Prospective Series
    Ricciardi, Enzo
    Tomao, Federica
    Aletti, Giovanni
    Bazzurini, Luca
    Bocciolone, Luca
    Boveri, Sara
    Landoni, Fabio
    Lapresa, Maria Teresa
    Maruccio, Matteo
    Parma, Gabriella
    Peccatori, Fedro
    Petrella, Maria Cristina
    Zanagnolo, Vanna
    Colombo, Nicoletta
    Maggioni, Angelo
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 37 (09) : 5241 - 5248
  • [29] Best practices in risk reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy: the influence of surgical specialty
    Malacarne, Dominique R.
    Boyd, Leslie R.
    Long, Yang
    Blank, Stephanie V.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 15
  • [30] Hysterectomy and Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy: Variations by History of Military Service and Birth Cohort
    Callegari, Lisa S.
    Gray, Kristen E.
    Zephyrin, Laurie C.
    Harrington, Laura B.
    Gerber, Megan R.
    Cochrane, Barbara B.
    Weitlauf, Julie C.
    Bean-Mayberry, Bevanne
    Bastian, Lori A.
    Mattocks, Kristin M.
    Haskell, Sally G.
    Katon, Jodie G.
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2016, 56 : S67 - S77