Attitudes towards digital treatment for depression: A European stakeholder survey

被引:174
作者
Topooco, Naira [1 ]
Riper, Heleen [2 ]
Araya, Ricardo [3 ]
Berking, Matthias [4 ]
Brunn, Matthias [5 ]
Chevreul, Karine [6 ]
Cieslak, Roman [7 ]
Ebert, David Daniel [4 ]
Etchmendy, Ernestina [8 ]
Herrero, Rocio [9 ]
Kleiboer, Annet [2 ]
Krieger, Tobias [10 ]
Garcia-Palacios, Azucena [9 ]
Cerga-Pashoja, Arlinda [3 ]
Smoktunowicz, Ewelina [7 ]
Urech, Antoine [10 ]
Vis, Christiaan [2 ,11 ]
Andersson, Gerhard [1 ,12 ]
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Dept Behav Sci & Learning, SE-58183 Linkoping, Sweden
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Fac Behav & Movement Sci, Dept Clin Neuro & Dev Psychol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Populat Hlth, London, England
[4] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nuremberg, Dept Clin Psychol & Psychotherapy, Erlangen, Germany
[5] Univ Paris Diderot, INSERM, ECEVE, Paris, France
[6] AP HP, URC Eco Ile De France, Paris, France
[7] SWPS Univ Social Sci & Humanities, Dept Psychol, Warsaw, Poland
[8] Inst Salud Carlos III, CIBER Fisiopatol Obesidad & Nutr CIBERObn, Madrid, Spain
[9] Univ Jaume 1, Inst Salud Carlos III, CIBER Fisiopatol Obesidad & Nutr CIBERObn, Castellon de La Plana, Spain
[10] Univ Bern, Dept Psychol, Bern, Switzerland
[11] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, VU Med Ctr Amsterdam, EMGO Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[12] Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Neurosci, Psychiat Sect, Stockholm, Sweden
来源
INTERNET INTERVENTIONS-THE APPLICATION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN MENTAL AND BEHAVIOURAL HEALTH | 2017年 / 8卷
关键词
Depression; E-mental health; Comparative effectiveness research; Digital treatment; Internet-delivered; Blended treatment; COGNITIVE-BEHAVIOR THERAPY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; INTERNET-BASED TREATMENT; SELF-HELP; INTERVENTION; DISORDERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.invent.2017.01.001
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Background: The integration of digital treatments into national mental health services is on the agenda in the European Union. The E-COMPARED consortium conducted a survey aimed at exploring stakeholders' knowledge, acceptance and expectations of digital treatments for depression, and at identifying factors that might influence their opinions when considering the implementation of these approaches. Method: An online survey was conducted in eight European countries: France, Germany, Netherlands, Poland, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and The United Kingdom. Organisations representing government bodies, care providers, service-users, funding/insurance bodies, technical developers and researchers were invited to participate in the survey. The participating countries and organisations reflect the diversity in health care infrastructures and e-health implementation across Europe. Results: A total of 764 organisations were invited to the survey during the period March-June 2014, with 175 of these organisations participating in our survey. The participating stakeholders reported moderate knowledge of digital treatments and considered cost-effectiveness to be the primary incentive for integration into care services. Low feasibility of delivery within existing care services was considered to be a primary barrier. Digital treatments were regarded more suitable for milder forms of depression. Stakeholders showed greater acceptability towards blended treatment (the integration of face-to-face and internet sessions within the same treatment protocol) compared to standalone internet treatments. Organisations in countries with developed e-health solutions reported greater knowledge and acceptability of digital treatments. Conclusion: Mental health stakeholders in Europe are aware of the potential benefits of digital interventions. However, there are variations between countries and stakeholders in terms of level of knowledge about such interventions and their feasibility within routine care services. The high acceptance of blended treatments is an interesting finding that indicates a gradual integration of technology into clinical practice may fit the attitudes and needs of stakeholders. The potential of the blended treatment approach, in terms of enhancing acceptance of digital treatment while retaining the benefit of cost-effectiveness in delivery, should be further explored. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 9
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [31] Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013
    Vos, Theo
    Barber, Ryan M.
    Bell, Brad
    Bertozzi-Villa, Amelia
    Biryukov, Stan
    Bolliger, Ian
    Charlson, Fiona
    Davis, Adrian
    Degenhardt, Louisa
    Dicker, Daniel
    Duan, Leilei
    Erskine, Holly
    Feigin, Valery L.
    Ferrari, Alize J.
    Fitzmaurice, Christina
    Fleming, Thomas
    Graetz, Nicholas
    Guinovart, Caterina
    Haagsma, Juanita
    Hansen, Gillian M.
    Hanson, Sarah Wulf
    Heuton, Kyle R.
    Higashi, Hideki
    Kassebaum, Nicholas
    Kyu, Hmwe
    Laurie, Evan
    Liang, Xiofeng
    Lofgren, Katherine
    Lozano, Rafael
    MacIntyre, Michael F.
    Moradi-Lakeh, Maziar
    Naghavi, Mohsen
    Nguyen, Grant
    Odell, Shaun
    Ortblad, Katrina
    Roberts, David Allen
    Roth, Gregory A.
    Sandar, Logan
    Serina, Peter T.
    Stanaway, Jeffrey D.
    Steiner, Caitlyn
    Thomas, Bernadette
    Vollset, Stein Emil
    Whiteford, Harvey
    Wolock, Timothy M.
    Ye, Pengpeng
    Zhou, Maigeng
    Avila, Marco A.
    Aasvang, Gunn Marit
    Abbafati, Cristiana
    [J]. LANCET, 2015, 386 (9995) : 743 - 800
  • [32] Mixing Online and Face-to-Face Therapy: How to Benefit From Blended Care in Mental Health Care
    Wentzel, Jobke
    van der Vaart, Rosalie
    Bohlmeijer, Ernst T.
    van Gemert-Pijnen, Julia E. W. C.
    [J]. JMIR MENTAL HEALTH, 2016, 3 (01):
  • [33] WHO, 2008, GLOB BURD DIS 2004 U