The use of visible (VIS) and near infrared (NIR) reflectance spectroscopy to predict fibre diameter in both clean and greasy wool samples

被引:16
作者
Cozzolino, D [1 ]
Montossi, F
Julian, RS
机构
[1] Inst Nacl Invest Agr, Estac Expt INIA Estanzuela, Anim Nutr & NIRS Lab, Colonia, Uruguay
[2] Estac Expt INIA Tacuarembo, Sheep Program, Tacuarembo, Uruguay
来源
ANIMAL SCIENCE | 2005年 / 80卷
关键词
fibres; spectroscopy; wool;
D O I
10.1079/ASC41760333
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Visible (VIS) and near infrared (NIR) reflectance spectroscopy combined with multivariate data analysis were explored to predict fibre diameter in both clean and greasy Merino wool samples. Fifty clean and 400 greasy wool samples were analysed. Samples were scanned in a large cuvette using a NIRSystems 6500 monochromator instrument by reflectance in the VIS and NIR regions (400 to 2500 nm). Partial least square (PLS) regression was used to develop a number of calibration models between the spectral and reference data. Different mathematical treatments were used during model development. Cross validation was used to assess the performance and avoid overfitting of the models. The NIR calibration models gave a coefficient of determination in calibration (R-2) > 0.90 for clean wool samples and a R-2 < 0.50 for greasy wool samples. The values for the residual predictive value, PPD, (ratio of standard deviation (s.d.) to the root mean square of the standard error of cross validation (RMSECV)) were 3 for clean and 0.6 for greasy wool samples, respectively. The results indicated that fibre diameter in greasy wool samples was poorly predicted with NIR, while clean wool showed good relationships. More research is required to improve the calibration on greasy wool samples if the technology is to be used for rapid analysis to assist in the selection of animals in breeding programmes.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 337
页数:5
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Barnes R.J., Dhanoa M.S., Lister S.J., Standard normal variate transformation and detrending of near infrared diffuse reflectance spectra, Applied Spectroscopy, 43, pp. 772-777, (1989)
[2]  
Batten G.D., Plant analysis using near infrared reflectance spectroscopy: The potential and the limitations, Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 38, pp. 697-706, (1998)
[3]  
Church J.S., O'Neill J.A., The detection of polymeric contaminants in loose scoured wool, Vibrational Spectroscopy, 19, pp. 285-293, (1999)
[4]  
Cleve E., Bach E., Schollmeyer E., Using chemometrics methods and NIR spectrophotometry in the textile industry, Analytica Chimica Acta, 420, pp. 163-167, (2000)
[5]  
Coleman S.W., Lupton C.J., Pfeiffer F.A., Minikhiem D.L., Hart S.P., Prediction of clean mohair, fibre diameter, vegetable matter, and medullated fibre with near infrared spectroscopy, Journal of Animal Science, 77, pp. 2594-2602, (1999)
[6]  
Connell J.P., Predicting wool base of greasy wool by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy, Textile Research Journal, 53, pp. 651-655, (1983)
[7]  
Connell J.P., Brown O.H., The yield testing of wool by reflectance spectroscopy, Journal of Textile Institute, 69, pp. 357-363, (1978)
[8]  
Cowe I.A., McNicol J.W., The use of principal components in the analysis of near infrared spectra, Applied Spectroscopy, 39, pp. 257-265, (1985)
[9]  
Dahm D.J., Dahm K.D., The physics of near infrared scattering, Near Infrared Technology in the Agricultural and Food Industries, pp. 1-19, (2001)
[10]  
Deaville E.R., Flinn P.C., Near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy: An alternative approach for the estimation of forage quality and voluntary intake, Forage Evaluation in Ruminant Nutrition, pp. 301-320, (2000)