Gabapentin supplemented with ropivacain block of trigger points improves pain control and quality of life in trigeminal neuralgia patients when compared with gabapentin alone

被引:45
作者
Lemos, Laurinda [1 ,2 ]
Flores, Sara [2 ]
Oliveira, Pedro
Almeida, Armando [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minho, Sch Hlth Sci, Hlth & Life Sci Res Inst, P-4710057 Braga, Portugal
[2] Univ Fafe, Fafe, Portugal
关键词
trigeminal neuralgia; gabapentin; ropivacain; analgesic block; pain intensity; qality of life; SIP;
D O I
10.1097/AJP.0b013e318158011a
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objective: Pain control in trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is achieved using anticonvulsivants, mainly carbamazepine. When this drug cannot be used, other drugs like gabapentin (GBP) have been used to provide adequate pain control. To improve the therapeutic effect of GBP, we evaluated the clinical efficacy of associating GBP with ropivacain (ROP) analgesic block of facial trigger points in TN patients. Design: Thirty-six TN patients were randomly assigned during 4 weeks to I of the following protocols: Protocol I-daily oral GBP administered in a titrated dose; Protocol II-ROP applied as analgesic block to TN trigger points once a week; Protocol III-daily oral GBP plus ROP once a week. Protocol II had to be discontinued in 7/12, patients owing to insufficient pain control. Pain intensity was evaluated by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and disability was assessed by Sickness Impact Profile. Results: When compared with Protocol I, Protocol III (GBP+ROP) patients showed (1) a reduction of VAS score after 7 and 28 days of treatment, an effect that was still present 6 and 12 months later; (2) a faster reduction of VAS score using a significantly lower dose of GBP; (3) a smaller total and daily GBP dose at the end of the treatment, which resulted in a total, absence of adverse side effects; and (4) an improvement of the functional well-being measured by the Sickness Impact Profile. The number needed to treat (NNT) (GBP + ROP vs. GBP protocols) to obtain 1 GBP + ROP-treated patient with at least 50% pain relief was 1.71 (day 7) and 2.40 (day 28). Conclusions: The association of GBP and ROP is safe, without side effects and results in an important clinical benefit associated to an improvement of the functional health status of TN patients when compared with GBP alone. This may constitute a therapeutic alternative for pain control in TN patients who cannot be treated with carbamazepine.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 75
页数:12
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Management strategies for the treatment of neuropathic pain in the elderly [J].
Ahmad, M ;
Goucke, CR .
DRUGS & AGING, 2002, 19 (12) :929-945
[2]   Confidence intervals for the number needed to treat [J].
Altman, DG .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 317 (7168) :1309-1312
[3]  
Amir R, 1999, J NEUROSCI, V19, P8589
[4]   PROLONGED RELIEF OF NEURALGIA AFTER REGIONAL ANESTHETIC BLOCKS - A CALL FOR FURTHER EXPERIMENTAL AND SYSTEMATIC CLINICAL-STUDIES [J].
ARNER, S ;
LINDBLOM, U ;
MEYERSON, BA ;
MOLANDER, C .
PAIN, 1990, 43 (03) :287-297
[5]   Gabapentin for the symptomatic treatment of painful neuropathy in patients with diabetes mellitus - A randomized controlled trial [J].
Backonja, M ;
Beydoun, A ;
Edwards, KR ;
Schwartz, SL ;
Fonseca, V ;
Hes, M ;
LaMoreaux, L ;
Garofalo, E .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (21) :1831-1836
[6]   Gabapentin dosing for neuropathic pain: Evidence from randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials [J].
Backonja, M ;
Glanzman, RL .
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2003, 25 (01) :81-104
[7]   Anticonvulsants (antineuropathics) for neuropathic pain syndromes [J].
Backonja, MM .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2000, 16 (02) :S67-S72
[8]   THE SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE - DEVELOPMENT AND FINAL REVISION OF A HEALTH-STATUS MEASURE [J].
BERGNER, M ;
BOBBITT, RA ;
CARTER, WB ;
GILSON, BS .
MEDICAL CARE, 1981, 19 (08) :787-805
[9]  
BREIVIK H, 2006, WALL MELZACKS TXB PA, P903
[10]   CARBAMAZEPINE INHIBITS SPONTANEOUS ACTIVITY IN EXPERIMENTAL NEUROMAS [J].
BURCHIEL, KJ .
EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY, 1988, 102 (02) :249-253