Urology residency training in Greece. Results from the first national resident survey

被引:0
作者
Tzelves, L. [1 ]
Glykas, I [2 ]
Lazarou, L. [1 ]
Zabaftis, C. [3 ]
Fragkoulis, C. [2 ]
Leventi, A. [2 ]
Moulavasilis, N. [3 ]
Tzavellas, D. [3 ]
Tsirkas, K. [1 ]
Ntoumas, K. [2 ]
Mourmouris, P. [1 ]
Dellis, A. [4 ,5 ]
Varkarakis, I [1 ]
Skolarikos, A. [1 ]
Liatsikos, E. [6 ]
Gkialas, I [7 ]
机构
[1] Natl & Kapodistrian Univ Athens, Sismanogleio Gen Hosp, Second Dept Urol, Atenas, Greece
[2] Gen Hosp Athens G Gennimatas, Dept Urol, Atenas, Greece
[3] Natl & Kapodistrian Univ Athens, Laiko Hosp, Dept Urol 1, Atenas, Greece
[4] Natl & Kapodistrian Univ Athens, Aretaie Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Surg 2, Atenas, Greece
[5] Natl & Kapodistrian Univ Athens, Laiko Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Urol 1, Atenas, Greece
[6] Univ Patras, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Patras, Greece
[7] Anticanc Oncol Hosp Athens, Dept Urol Agios Savvas, Atenas, Greece
来源
ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS | 2021年 / 45卷 / 08期
关键词
Greek urology residency program; National resident survey; Greek urology training program; Resident surveys; COVID-19; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.acuro.2020.11.008
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and objectives: This is the first national survey assessing Greek Urology residency programs. The main objective of this study is to assess the level of confidence and perception of Greek Urology residents regarding their educational program and detect areas of improvement. Material and methods: A 51-question survey was developed via an electronic platform and answered by 91 out of 104 Greek residents from March 2019 until May 2019. Fisher's exact test, chi-squared test and Kruskal-Wallis test were used with statistical significance set at p=.05. Results: The median overall satisfaction regarding surgical training was 6/10 regardless of working schedule, working in a University Department, PGY or number of residents in clinic. Most residents have not performed any scrotal ultrasound or pressure-flow-studies; however, they are more familiar with KUB ultrasound. Double-J stent insertion and cystoscopy were common procedures for residents. Bureaucracy was reported as a major issue by 70.4% of residents. ESWL has not been performed by 80.2% of residents, 58.2% residents performed less than 10 ureteroscopies, and only the last year trainees performed more than 10 TURBT and TURP. Most residents mentioned to rarely perform basic steps in many open or laparoscopic urological procedures. Surprisingly, 59.3% of residents have not published any study in peer-reviewed journals. Regarding satisfaction, 44% rarely feel satisfied at work and 59.3% sometimes suffer from burnout. Response rate reached 87.5%. Conclusions: Considering the results from this survey, regulatory authorities should join forces to establish a structured curriculum of clinical, surgical and research training in Urology across Europe. (C) 2021 AEU. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. ALL rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:537 / 544
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Training, Research, and Working Conditions for Urology Residents in Germany: A Contemporary Survey
    Borgmann, Hendrik
    Arnold, Hannah K.
    Meyer, Christian P.
    Bruendl, Johannes
    Koenig, Justus
    Nestler, Tim
    Ruf, Christian
    Struck, Julian
    Salem, Johannes
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2018, 4 (03): : 455 - 460
  • [2] Results of the European Basic Laparoscopic Urological Skills Examination
    Brinkman, Willem M.
    Tjiam, Irene M.
    Schout, Barbara M. A.
    Muijtjens, Arno M. M.
    Van Cleynenbreugel, Ben
    Koldewijn, Evert L.
    Witjes, J. Alfred
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 65 (02) : 490 - 496
  • [3] Campi R, 2020, ACTAS UROL ESP
  • [4] Current status of urology surgical training in Europe: an ESRU-ESU-ESUT collaborative study
    Carrion, Diego M.
    Rodriguez-Socarras, Moises E.
    Mantica, Guglielmo
    Esperto, Francesco
    Cebulla, Angelika
    Duijvesz, Diederick
    Patruno, Giulio
    Vasquez, Juan L.
    Veneziano, Domenico
    Diez-Sebastian, Jesus
    Gozen, Ali S.
    Palou, Joan
    Gomez Rivas, Juan
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 38 (01) : 239 - 246
  • [5] Carrion DM, 2018, ARCH ESP UROL, V71, P11
  • [6] Urology Residency Training in Italy: Results of the First National Survey
    Cocci, Andrea
    Patruno, Giulio
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Rizzo, Michele
    Esperto, Francesco
    Parnanzini, Daniele
    Pietropaolo, Amelia
    Principi, Emanuele
    Talso, Michele
    Baldesi, Ramona
    Battaglia, Antonino
    Shehu, Ervin
    Carrobbio, Francesca
    Corsaro, Alfio
    La Rocca, Roberto
    Marchioni, Michele
    Bianchi, Lorenzo
    Miglioranza, Eugenio
    Mantica, Guglielmo
    Martorana, Eugenio
    Misuraca, Leonardo
    Fontana, Dario
    Forte, Saverio
    Napoli, Giancarlo
    Russo, Giorgio Ivan
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2018, 4 (02): : 280 - 287
  • [8] Adapting Urology Residency Training in the COVID-19 Era
    Kwon, Young Suk
    Tabakin, Alexandra L.
    Patel, Hiren, V
    Backstrand, Jeffrey R.
    Jang, Thomas L.
    Kim, Isaac Y.
    Singer, Eric A.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2020, 141 : 15 - 19
  • [9] Lee A, 2020, UROLOGY
  • [10] Resident burnout in USA and European urology residents: an international concern
    Marchalik, Daniel
    Goldman, Charlotte C.
    Carvalho, Filipe F. L.
    Talso, Michele
    Lynch, John H.
    Esperto, Francesco
    Pradere, Benjamin
    Van Besien, Jeroen
    Krasnow, Ross E.
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 124 (02) : 349 - 356