Intraocular pressure in American Bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana) measured with rebound and applanation tonometry

被引:9
作者
Cannizzo, Sarah A. [1 ]
Lewbart, Gregory A. [1 ]
Westermeyer, Hans D. [1 ]
机构
[1] North Carolina State Univ, Coll Vet Med, Dept Clin Sci, 1060 William Moore Dr, Raleigh, NC 27607 USA
关键词
American Bullfrog; intraocular pressure; Rana catesbeiana; tonometry; Tono-Pen AVIA Vet (R); TonoVet (R); CORNEAL EPITHELIAL DEFECTS; DIAMOND BURR DEBRIDEMENT; SURGICAL-INSTRUMENTS; CONTACT-LENS; DOGS; EROSIONS; ULCERS; DISINFECTION; INFECTIONS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1111/vop.12463
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Objective To measure the intraocular pressure (IOP) in normal American Bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana) with rebound and applanation tonometry and to create calibration curves for both tonometers to determine the actual IOP of bullfrogs. Procedures Twenty bullfrogs were evaluated with slip-lamp biomicroscopy, indirect ophthalmoscopy, rebound tonometry, and applanation tonometry. Axial globe length and corneal thickness were measured in the three largest and the three smallest frogs with ultrasonography and optical coherence tomography, respectively. Two frogs were euthanized for direct manometry. Results The median IOP was 4 mmHg with the rebound tonometer and 16 mmHg with the applanation tonometer. The correlation coefficient (r(2)) between the manometry measurements and the tonometers was 0.95 and 0.91 for the rebound and applanation tonometers, respectively. The corresponding equations were y = 0.331x + 0.558 for the rebound tonometer and y = 0.675x + 1.907 for the applanation tonometer. The median axial globe length was 0.94 cm. The median corneal thickness was 0.093 mm. Conclusions The rebound tonometer is the preferable tonometer for American Bullfrogs. Neither tonometer produced IOP readings that matched the manometer. The rebound tonometer was more precise and it was faster and easier to use.
引用
收藏
页码:526 / 532
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparability of three intraocular pressure measurement: iCare pro rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in different IOP group
    Min Chen
    Lina Zhang
    Jia Xu
    Xinyi Chen
    Yuxiang Gu
    Yuping Ren
    Kaijun Wang
    BMC Ophthalmology, 19
  • [42] Comparability of three intraocular pressure measurement: iCare pro rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in different IOP group
    Chen, Min
    Zhang, Lina
    Xu, Jia
    Chen, Xinyi
    Gu, Yuxiang
    Ren, Yuping
    Wang, Kaijun
    BMC OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [43] Effect of manual eyelid manipulation on intraocular pressure measurement by rebound tonometry
    Baek, Sung Uk
    Ha, Ahnul
    Kim, Young Kook
    Jeoung, Jin Wook
    Park, Ki Ho
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 102 (11) : 1515 - 1519
  • [44] Assessment of Factors Affecting the Difference in Intraocular Pressure Measurements Between Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry
    Wang, Jing
    Cayer, Marie-Michelle
    Descovich, Denise
    Kamdeu-Fansi, Alvine
    Harasymowycz, Paul J.
    Li, Gisele
    Lesk, Mark R.
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2011, 20 (08) : 482 - 487
  • [45] Effect of central corneal thickness on intraocular pressure with the rebound tonometer and the applanation tonometer in normal dogs
    Park, Young-Woo
    Jeong, Man-Bok
    Kim, Tae-Hyun
    Ahn, Jae-Sang
    Ahn, Jeong-Taek
    Park, Shin-Ae
    Kim, Se-Eun
    Seo, Kangmoon
    VETERINARY OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2011, 14 (03) : 169 - 173
  • [46] Comparison of Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and Dynamic Contour Tonometry in the Measurement of Intraocular Pressure in Eyes with Different Corneal Thicknesses
    Roszkowska, A. M.
    De Grazia, L.
    Cirone, M.
    Ferreri, G.
    OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2009, 223 (04) : 244 - 249
  • [47] Goldmann applanation tonometry error relative to true intracameral intraocular pressure in vitro and in vivo
    Sean McCafferty
    Jason Levine
    Jim Schwiegerling
    Eniko T. Enikov
    BMC Ophthalmology, 17
  • [48] Comparison of the corrected intraocular pressure by tonopachy with that of Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal and glaucomatous patients
    Velis, Girish
    Kavitha, Srinivasan
    Zebardast, Nazlee
    Sengupta, Sabyasachi
    Venkatesh, Rengaraj
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 68 (04) : 620 - 626
  • [49] The Clinical Interpretation of Changes in Intraocular Pressure Measurements Using Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: A Review
    Pearce, John G.
    Maddess, Ted
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2019, 28 (04) : 302 - 306
  • [50] INTRAOCULAR-PRESSURE DECREASE AFTER LOCAL OCULAR COOLING IS UNDERESTIMATED BY APPLANATION TONOMETRY
    ORGUL, S
    FLAMMER, J
    STUMPFIG, D
    HENDRICKSON, P
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1995, 19 (02) : 95 - 99