Intraocular pressure in American Bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana) measured with rebound and applanation tonometry

被引:8
|
作者
Cannizzo, Sarah A. [1 ]
Lewbart, Gregory A. [1 ]
Westermeyer, Hans D. [1 ]
机构
[1] North Carolina State Univ, Coll Vet Med, Dept Clin Sci, 1060 William Moore Dr, Raleigh, NC 27607 USA
关键词
American Bullfrog; intraocular pressure; Rana catesbeiana; tonometry; Tono-Pen AVIA Vet (R); TonoVet (R); CORNEAL EPITHELIAL DEFECTS; DIAMOND BURR DEBRIDEMENT; SURGICAL-INSTRUMENTS; CONTACT-LENS; DOGS; EROSIONS; ULCERS; DISINFECTION; INFECTIONS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1111/vop.12463
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Objective To measure the intraocular pressure (IOP) in normal American Bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana) with rebound and applanation tonometry and to create calibration curves for both tonometers to determine the actual IOP of bullfrogs. Procedures Twenty bullfrogs were evaluated with slip-lamp biomicroscopy, indirect ophthalmoscopy, rebound tonometry, and applanation tonometry. Axial globe length and corneal thickness were measured in the three largest and the three smallest frogs with ultrasonography and optical coherence tomography, respectively. Two frogs were euthanized for direct manometry. Results The median IOP was 4 mmHg with the rebound tonometer and 16 mmHg with the applanation tonometer. The correlation coefficient (r(2)) between the manometry measurements and the tonometers was 0.95 and 0.91 for the rebound and applanation tonometers, respectively. The corresponding equations were y = 0.331x + 0.558 for the rebound tonometer and y = 0.675x + 1.907 for the applanation tonometer. The median axial globe length was 0.94 cm. The median corneal thickness was 0.093 mm. Conclusions The rebound tonometer is the preferable tonometer for American Bullfrogs. Neither tonometer produced IOP readings that matched the manometer. The rebound tonometer was more precise and it was faster and easier to use.
引用
收藏
页码:526 / 532
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Intraocular pressure measurements with applanation tonometry and with digital tonometry through the eyelids: Comparative results
    Karabatsas, CH
    Kotsimpou, K
    Chatzoulis, DZ
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2003, 44 : U372 - U372
  • [42] Intraocular Pressure in Captive Black-footed Penguins (Spheniscus demersus) Measured by Rebound Tonometry
    Mercado, Julio A.
    Wirtu, Gemechu
    Beaufrere, Hugues
    Lydick, Dianna
    JOURNAL OF AVIAN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2010, 24 (02) : 138 - 141
  • [43] Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement between rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in treated glaucoma patients
    Vincent, Stephen J.
    Vincent, Roslyn A.
    Shields, David
    Lee, Graham A.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 40 (04): : E163 - E170
  • [44] Intraocular pressure difference in goldmann applanation tonometry versus Perkins hand-held applanation tonometry in overweight patients
    dos Santos, MG
    Makk, S
    Berghold, A
    Eckhardt, M
    Haas, A
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1998, 105 (12) : 2260 - 2263
  • [45] Association of central blood pressure measured by catheter and applanation tonometry
    Yamazaki, M.
    Hoshino, F.
    Oshiumi, A.
    Sagawa, Y.
    Kawano, T.
    Miyawaki, Y.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2008, 26 : S29 - S29
  • [46] Untreated 24-h intraocular pressures measured with Goldmann applanation tonometry vs nighttime supine pressures with Perkins applanation tonometry
    Quaranta, L.
    Konstas, A. G. P.
    Rossetti, L.
    Garcia-Feijoo, J.
    O'Brien, C.
    Nasr, M. B.
    Fogagnolo, P.
    Demos, C. M.
    Stewart, J. A.
    Stewart, W. C.
    EYE, 2010, 24 (07) : 1252 - 1258
  • [47] Untreated 24-h intraocular pressures measured with Goldmann applanation tonometry vs nighttime supine pressures with Perkins applanation tonometry
    L Quaranta
    A G P Konstas
    L Rossetti
    J Garcia-Feijoo
    C O'Brien
    M B Nasr
    P Fogagnolo
    C M Demos
    J A Stewart
    W C Stewart
    Eye, 2010, 24 : 1252 - 1258
  • [48] Efficacy of potential chemical control compounds for removing invasive American bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana)
    Witmer, Gary W.
    Snow, Nathan P.
    Moulton, Rachael S.
    SPRINGERPLUS, 2015, 4 : 1 - 5
  • [49] Overestimation of Intraocular Pressure by Goldmann Applanation Tonometry Without Astigmatic Correction
    Stewart, Rosalind M. K.
    Wishart, Peter K.
    Kaye, Stephen B.
    JAMA OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 134 (03)
  • [50] The Influence of Central Corneal Thickness on Intraocular Pressure Measured by Goldmann Applanation Tonometry Among Selected Ethiopian Communities
    Gelaw, Yeshigeta
    Kollmann, Martin
    Irungu, Njuguna M.
    Ilako, Dunera R.
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2010, 19 (08) : 514 - 518