Intraocular pressure in American Bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana) measured with rebound and applanation tonometry

被引:9
|
作者
Cannizzo, Sarah A. [1 ]
Lewbart, Gregory A. [1 ]
Westermeyer, Hans D. [1 ]
机构
[1] North Carolina State Univ, Coll Vet Med, Dept Clin Sci, 1060 William Moore Dr, Raleigh, NC 27607 USA
关键词
American Bullfrog; intraocular pressure; Rana catesbeiana; tonometry; Tono-Pen AVIA Vet (R); TonoVet (R); CORNEAL EPITHELIAL DEFECTS; DIAMOND BURR DEBRIDEMENT; SURGICAL-INSTRUMENTS; CONTACT-LENS; DOGS; EROSIONS; ULCERS; DISINFECTION; INFECTIONS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1111/vop.12463
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Objective To measure the intraocular pressure (IOP) in normal American Bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana) with rebound and applanation tonometry and to create calibration curves for both tonometers to determine the actual IOP of bullfrogs. Procedures Twenty bullfrogs were evaluated with slip-lamp biomicroscopy, indirect ophthalmoscopy, rebound tonometry, and applanation tonometry. Axial globe length and corneal thickness were measured in the three largest and the three smallest frogs with ultrasonography and optical coherence tomography, respectively. Two frogs were euthanized for direct manometry. Results The median IOP was 4 mmHg with the rebound tonometer and 16 mmHg with the applanation tonometer. The correlation coefficient (r(2)) between the manometry measurements and the tonometers was 0.95 and 0.91 for the rebound and applanation tonometers, respectively. The corresponding equations were y = 0.331x + 0.558 for the rebound tonometer and y = 0.675x + 1.907 for the applanation tonometer. The median axial globe length was 0.94 cm. The median corneal thickness was 0.093 mm. Conclusions The rebound tonometer is the preferable tonometer for American Bullfrogs. Neither tonometer produced IOP readings that matched the manometer. The rebound tonometer was more precise and it was faster and easier to use.
引用
收藏
页码:526 / 532
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements using rebound (TonoVet®) and applanation (TonoPen-XL®) tonometry in clinically normal alpacas (Vicugna pacos)
    McDonald, Jessica E.
    Knollinger, Amy M.
    Dees, D. Dustin
    MacLaren, Nicole E.
    VETERINARY OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 20 (02) : 155 - 159
  • [22] Dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry: correlation with intracameral assessment of intraocular pressure
    Riva, Ivano
    Quaranta, Luciano
    Russo, Andrea
    Katsanos, Andreas
    Rulli, Eliana
    Floriani, Irene
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 22 (01) : 55 - 62
  • [23] Rebound tonometry versus Goldmann tonometry in school children: feasibility and agreement of intraocular pressure measurements
    Barranco Esporcatte, Bruno Leonardo
    Santos Lopes, Flÿvio Siqueira
    Netto, Camila Fonseca
    Reboucas-Santos, Vespasiano
    Dias, Diego Torres
    Marujo, Fabio Iglesias
    Rolim-de-Moura, Christiane
    ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE OFTALMOLOGIA, 2015, 78 (06) : 359 - 362
  • [24] Intraocular Pressure in Captive Black-footed Penguins (Spheniscus demersus) Measured by Rebound Tonometry
    Mercado, Julio A.
    Wirtu, Gemechu
    Beaufrere, Hugues
    Lydick, Dianna
    JOURNAL OF AVIAN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2010, 24 (02) : 138 - 141
  • [25] Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement between rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in treated glaucoma patients
    Vincent, Stephen J.
    Vincent, Roslyn A.
    Shields, David
    Lee, Graham A.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 40 (04) : E163 - E170
  • [26] The Influence of Central Corneal Thickness on Intraocular Pressure Measured by Goldmann Applanation Tonometry Among Selected Ethiopian Communities
    Gelaw, Yeshigeta
    Kollmann, Martin
    Irungu, Njuguna M.
    Ilako, Dunera R.
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2010, 19 (08) : 514 - 518
  • [27] Diurnal variation of central corneal thickness and Goldmann applanation tonometry estimates of intraocular pressure
    Hamilton, Kirsten Elizabeth
    Pye, David Cecil
    Aggarwala, Shivani
    Evian, Sindy
    Khosla, Joti
    Perera, Rachithri
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2007, 16 (01) : 29 - 35
  • [28] Assessment of intraocular pressure in chinchillas of different age groups using rebound tonometry
    Yokoay Claros Chacaltana, Flor Diana
    Tadeu Pigatto, Joao Antonio
    Denardin, Ione Terezinha
    CIENCIA RURAL, 2016, 46 (08): : 1466 - 1471
  • [29] Comparisons of intraocular pressure measurements: Goldmann applanation tonometry, noncontact tonometry, Tono-Pen tonometry, and dynamic contour tonometry
    Hsu, S-Y
    Sheu, M-M
    Hsu, A-H
    Wu, K-Y
    Yeh, J-I
    Tien, J-N
    Tsai, R-K
    EYE, 2009, 23 (07) : 1582 - 1588
  • [30] Comparisons of intraocular pressure measurements: Goldmann applanation tonometry, noncontact tonometry, Tono-Pen tonometry, and dynamic contour tonometry
    S-Y Hsu
    M-M Sheu
    A-H Hsu
    K-Y Wu
    J-I Yeh
    J-N Tien
    R-K Tsai
    Eye, 2009, 23 : 1582 - 1588