Intraocular pressure in American Bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana) measured with rebound and applanation tonometry

被引:9
|
作者
Cannizzo, Sarah A. [1 ]
Lewbart, Gregory A. [1 ]
Westermeyer, Hans D. [1 ]
机构
[1] North Carolina State Univ, Coll Vet Med, Dept Clin Sci, 1060 William Moore Dr, Raleigh, NC 27607 USA
关键词
American Bullfrog; intraocular pressure; Rana catesbeiana; tonometry; Tono-Pen AVIA Vet (R); TonoVet (R); CORNEAL EPITHELIAL DEFECTS; DIAMOND BURR DEBRIDEMENT; SURGICAL-INSTRUMENTS; CONTACT-LENS; DOGS; EROSIONS; ULCERS; DISINFECTION; INFECTIONS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1111/vop.12463
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Objective To measure the intraocular pressure (IOP) in normal American Bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana) with rebound and applanation tonometry and to create calibration curves for both tonometers to determine the actual IOP of bullfrogs. Procedures Twenty bullfrogs were evaluated with slip-lamp biomicroscopy, indirect ophthalmoscopy, rebound tonometry, and applanation tonometry. Axial globe length and corneal thickness were measured in the three largest and the three smallest frogs with ultrasonography and optical coherence tomography, respectively. Two frogs were euthanized for direct manometry. Results The median IOP was 4 mmHg with the rebound tonometer and 16 mmHg with the applanation tonometer. The correlation coefficient (r(2)) between the manometry measurements and the tonometers was 0.95 and 0.91 for the rebound and applanation tonometers, respectively. The corresponding equations were y = 0.331x + 0.558 for the rebound tonometer and y = 0.675x + 1.907 for the applanation tonometer. The median axial globe length was 0.94 cm. The median corneal thickness was 0.093 mm. Conclusions The rebound tonometer is the preferable tonometer for American Bullfrogs. Neither tonometer produced IOP readings that matched the manometer. The rebound tonometer was more precise and it was faster and easier to use.
引用
收藏
页码:526 / 532
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry
    J Y F Ku
    H V Danesh-Meyer
    J P Craig
    G D Gamble
    C N J McGhee
    Eye, 2006, 20 : 191 - 198
  • [2] ASSESSMENT OF INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE BY APPLANATION AND REBOUND TONOMETRY IN GUINEA PIGS OF DIFFERENT AGES
    Cairo, Marti
    Teresa Pena, Maria
    Rios, Jose
    Melero, Adria
    Martorell, Jaume
    Leiva, Marta
    JOURNAL OF EXOTIC PET MEDICINE, 2018, 27 (01) : 25 - 31
  • [3] Agreement of patient-measured intraocular pressure using rebound tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) in glaucoma patients
    Tan, Shaoying
    Yu, Marco
    Baig, Nafees
    Hansapinyo, Linda
    Tham, Clement C.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
  • [4] Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry
    Ku, JYF
    Danesh-Meyer, HV
    Craig, JP
    Gamble, GD
    McGhee, CNJ
    EYE, 2006, 20 (02) : 191 - 198
  • [5] INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE IN CAPTIVE AMERICAN FLAMINGOS (PHOENICOPTERUS RUBER) AS MEASURED BY REBOUND TONOMETRY
    Molter, Christine M.
    Hollingsworth, Steven R.
    Kass, Philip H.
    Chinnadurai, Sathya K.
    Wack, Raymund F.
    JOURNAL OF ZOO AND WILDLIFE MEDICINE, 2014, 45 (03) : 664 - 667
  • [6] Applanation resonance tonometry for intraocular pressure in humans
    Hallberg, P
    Lindén, C
    Lindahl, OA
    Bäcklund, T
    Eklund, A
    PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2004, 25 (04) : 1053 - 1065
  • [7] Intraocular Pressure Measured by Rebound Tonometry in Seven Raptor Species
    Yonez, Muhammed Kaan
    Erol, M.
    Erol, H.
    Atalan, G.
    Dogan, Z.
    Kibar, M.
    JOURNAL OF THE HELLENIC VETERINARY MEDICAL SOCIETY, 2022, 73 (02): : 3929 - 3934
  • [9] Assessment of intraocular pressure measured by Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer, Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, and Dynamic Contour Tonometry in healthy individuals
    Ouyang, Ping-Bo
    Li, Cong-Yi
    Zhu, Xiao-Hua
    Duan, Xuan-Chu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 5 (01) : 102 - 107
  • [10] Schiotz Scleral Intraocular Pressure Readings Predict Goldmann Applanation Readings Better Than Rebound Tonometry
    Senthil, Sirisha
    Chary, Raghava
    Ali, Mohammed Hasnat
    Choudhari, Nikhil
    Badakere, Swathi
    Krishnamurthy, Rashmi
    Dikshit, Siddharth
    Garudadri, Chandrasekhar
    CORNEA, 2019, 38 (09) : 1117 - 1123