Operationalizing an ecosystem services-based approach using Bayesian Belief Networks: An application to riparian buffer strips

被引:55
作者
McVittie, Alistair [1 ]
Norton, Lisa [2 ]
Martin-Ortega, Julia [3 ]
Siameti, Ioanna [1 ]
Glenk, Klaus [1 ]
Aalders, Inge [3 ]
机构
[1] Scotlands Rural Coll SRUC, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Lancaster Environm Ctr, Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Lancaster, England
[3] James Hutton Inst, Aberdeen, Scotland
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
Bayesian networks; Ecosystem services; Interdisciplinary research; Valuation; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; WATER-QUALITY; DIFFUSE PHOSPHORUS; ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; UNCERTAINTY; VALUATION; MODELS; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.12.004
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The interface between terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems contributes to the provision of key ecosystem services including improved water quality and reduced flood risk. We develop an ecological-economic model using a Bayesian Belief Network (BBN) to assess and value the delivery of ecosystem services from riparian buffer strips. By capturing the interactions underlying ecosystem processes and the delivery of services we aim to further the operationalization of ecosystem services approaches. The model is developed through outlining the underlying ecological processes which deliver ecosystem services. Alternative management options and regional locations are used for sensitivity analysis. We identify optimal management options but reveal relatively small differences between impacts of different management options. We discuss key issues raised as a result of the probabilistic nature of the BBN model. Uncertainty over outcomes has implications for the approach to valuation particularly where preferences might exhibit non-linearities or thresholds. The interaction between probabilistic outcomes and the statistical nature of valuation estimates suggests the need for further exploration of sensitivity in such models. Although the BBN is a promising participatory decision support tool, there remains a need to understand the trade-off between realism, precision and the benefits of developing joint understanding of the decision context. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 27
页数:13
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]   Using Bayesian networks to model watershed management decisions: an East Canyon Creek case study [J].
Ames, DP ;
Neilson, BT ;
Stevens, DK ;
Lall, U .
JOURNAL OF HYDROINFORMATICS, 2005, 7 (04) :267-282
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, GUIDELINES USING BAY
[3]  
[Anonymous], VAL EC SERV BETT ENV
[4]  
[Anonymous], UK NAT EC ASS UND NA
[5]  
[Anonymous], 0901 CSERGE EDM U E
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2009, 9 AUSTR GOV DEP ENV
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2005, EC HUM WELL BEING FR
[8]  
Baker B., 2007, REPORT BENEFITS WFD
[9]   Confronting unfamiliarity with ecosystem functions: The case for an ecosystem service approach to environmental valuation with stated preference methods [J].
Barkmann, J. ;
Glenk, K. ;
Keil, A. ;
Leemhuis, C. ;
Dietrich, N. ;
Gerold, G. ;
Marggraf, R. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 65 (01) :48-62
[10]   Bayesian belief networks as a meta-modelling tool in integrated river basin management - Pros and cons in evaluating nutrient abatement decisions under uncertainty in a Norwegian river basin [J].
Barton, D. N. ;
Saloranta, T. ;
Moe, S. J. ;
Eggestad, H. O. ;
Kuikka, S. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 66 (01) :91-104