It Takes Two-Skilled Recognition of Objects Engages Lateral Areas in Both Hemispheres

被引:37
作者
Bilalic, Merim [1 ]
Kiesel, Andrea [2 ]
Pohl, Carsten [2 ]
Erb, Michael [1 ]
Grodd, Wolfgang [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tubingen, Dept Neuroradiol, D-7400 Tubingen, Germany
[2] Univ Wurzburg, Dept Psychol, Wurzburg, Germany
[3] Univ Aachen, Clin Psychiat & Psychotherapy, D-5100 Aachen, Germany
关键词
ANTERIOR INFEROTEMPORAL CORTEX; EXPERT CHESS PLAYERS; NEURAL BASIS; DELIBERATE PRACTICE; MEMORY; PARIETAL; MECHANISMS; KNOWLEDGE; REGIONS; TASK;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0016202
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Our object recognition abilities, a direct product of our experience with objects, are fine-tuned to perfection. Left temporal and lateral areas along the dorsal, action related stream, as well as left infero-temporal areas along the ventral, object related stream are engaged in object recognition. Here we show that expertise modulates the activity of dorsal areas in the recognition of man-made objects with clearly specified functions. Expert chess players were faster than chess novices in identifying chess objects and their functional relations. Experts' advantage was domain-specific as there were no differences between groups in a control task featuring geometrical shapes. The pattern of eye movements supported the notion that experts' extensive knowledge about domain objects and their functions enabled superior recognition even when experts were not directly fixating the objects of interest. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) related exclusively the areas along the dorsal stream to chess specific object recognition. Besides the commonly involved left temporal and parietal lateral brain areas, we found that only in experts homologous areas on the right hemisphere were also engaged in chess specific object recognition. Based on these results, we discuss whether skilled object recognition does not only involve a more efficient version of the processes found in non-skilled recognition, but also qualitatively different cognitive processes which engage additional brain areas.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, THOUGHT CHOICE CHESS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1986, The logic of scientific discovery
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, The Rating of Chessplayers: Past and Present
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Chess players' thinking
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1988, NEUROPSYCHOLOGY MENT
[6]   The missing link: The role of interhemispheric interaction in attentional processing [J].
Banich, MT .
BRAIN AND COGNITION, 1998, 36 (02) :128-157
[7]   Why good thoughts block better ones: The mechanism of the pernicious Einstellung (set) effect [J].
Bilalic, Merim ;
McLeod, Peter ;
Gobet, Fernand .
COGNITION, 2008, 108 (03) :652-661
[8]   Inflexibility of experts - Reality or myth? Quantifying the Einstellung effect in chess masters [J].
Bilalic, Merim ;
McLeod, Peter ;
Gobet, Fernand .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 56 (02) :73-102
[9]   Does chess need intelligence? - A study with young chess players [J].
Bilalic, Merim ;
McLeod, Peter ;
Gobet, Fernand .
INTELLIGENCE, 2007, 35 (05) :457-470
[10]   Mechanisms and Neural Basis of Object and Pattern Recognition A Study With Chess Experts [J].
Bilalic, Merim ;
Langner, Robert ;
Erb, Michael ;
Grodd, Wolfgang .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2010, 139 (04) :728-742