A risk assessment methodology using intuitionistic fuzzy set in FMEA

被引:128
作者
Chang, Kuei-Hu [1 ]
Cheng, Ching-Hsue [2 ]
机构
[1] ROC Mil Acad, Dept Management Sci, Kaohsiung 830, Taiwan
[2] Natl Yunlin Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Informat Management, Yunlin 640, Taiwan
关键词
risk assessment; intuitionistic fuzzy set; risk priority number; decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory; SYSTEM FAILURE MODE; RELIABILITY; DESIGN; PRIORITIZATION; FRAMEWORK; BEHAVIOR; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1080/00207720903353633
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Most current risk assessment methods use the risk priority number (RPN) value to evaluate the risk of failure. However, conventional RPN methodology has been criticised as having five main shortcomings as follows: (1) the assumption that the RPN elements are equally weighted leads to over simplification; (2) the RPN scale itself has some non-intuitive statistical properties; (3) the RPN elements have many duplicate numbers; (4) the RPN is derived from only three factors mainly in terms of safety; and (5) the conventional RPN method has not considered indirect relations between components. To address the above issues, an efficient and comprehensive algorithm to evaluate the risk of failure is needed. This article proposes an innovative approach, which integrates the intuitionistic fuzzy set (IFS) and the decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) approach on risk assessment. The proposed approach resolves some of the shortcomings of the conventional RPN method. A case study, which assesses the risk of 0.15 mu m DRAM etching process, is used to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach. Finally, the result of the proposed method is compared with the listing approaches of risk assessment methods.
引用
收藏
页码:1457 / 1471
页数:15
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1988, POT FAIL MOD EFF AN
[2]   INTERVAL VALUED INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY-SETS [J].
ATANASSOV, K ;
GARGOV, G .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1989, 31 (03) :343-349
[3]  
ATANASSOV K, 1983, 169784 BULG AC SCI
[4]   An assessment of RPN prioritization in a failure modes effects and criticality analysis [J].
Bowles, JB .
ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM, 2003 PROCEEDINGS, 2003, :380-386
[5]   FUZZY-LOGIC PRIORITIZATION OF FAILURES IN A SYSTEM FAILURE MODE, EFFECTS AND CRITICALITY ANALYSIS [J].
BOWLES, JB ;
PELAEZ, CE .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 1995, 50 (02) :203-213
[6]  
Braglia M., 2000, INT J QUAL RELIAB MA, V17, P1017, DOI [10.1108/02656710010353885, DOI 10.1108/02656710010353885]
[7]   An integrated structural framework to cost-based FMECA: The priority-cost FMECA [J].
Carmignani, Gionata .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2009, 94 (04) :861-871
[8]   The reliability of general vague fault-tree analysis on weapon systems fault diagnosis [J].
Chang, JR ;
Chang, KH ;
Liao, SH ;
Cheng, CH .
SOFT COMPUTING, 2006, 10 (07) :531-542
[9]  
CHANG KH, J INTELLIGI IN PRESS
[10]   A novel efficient approach for DFMEA combining 2-tuple and the OWA operator [J].
Chang, Kuei-Hu ;
Wen, Ta-Chun .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2010, 37 (03) :2362-2370