Comparison of statistical analysis using the random-effects and inverse variance heterogeneity models for a meta-analysis

被引：1

作者：

Fu, Wei ^{[1
]}

Wang, Qin ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Southwest Med Univ, Clin Med, Luzhou 646000, Sichuan, Peoples R China

[2] Southwest Med Univ, Sichuan Treatment Ctr Gynaecol & Breast Dis Gyneco, Affiliated Hosp, Luzhou 646000, Sichuan, Peoples R China

来源：

INTERNATIONAL IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY | 2022年 / 108卷

关键词：

D O I：

10.1016/j.intimp.2022.108884

中图分类号：

R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];

学科分类号：

100102 ;

摘要：

In our previous meta-analysis of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios in Henoch-Schonlein purpura (W. Fu, et al., Int. Immunopharmacol 94 (2021) 107454.), the meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. In this study, the same data were re-analyzed using the Inverse Variance Heterogeneity (IVhet) model. Similar results were obtained from both models except for the different heterogeneities in the subgroup analysis of age. The analysis with the IVhet model also showed that the NLR played a more critical role than the PLR in HSP and its complications, and using multiple models would be helpful for better evaluating the clinical value of the study.

引用

页数：2

共 50 条

[41] Confidence intervals for the between-study variance in random-effects meta-analysis using generalised heterogeneity statistics: should we use unequal tails? [J].

Jackson, Dan ;

Bowden, Jack .

BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2016, 16

[42] Confidence intervals for the between-study variance in random-effects meta-analysis using generalised heterogeneity statistics: should we use unequal tails? [J].

Dan Jackson ;

Jack Bowden .

BMC Medical Research Methodology, 16

[43] Summarizing empirical information on between-study heterogeneity for Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis [J].

Roever, Christian ;

Sturtz, Sibylle ;

Lilienthal, Jona ;

Bender, Ralf ;

Friede, Tim .

STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2023, 42 (14) :2439-2454

[44] Evaluation of Heterogeneity and Heterogeneity Interval Estimators in Random-Effects Meta-Analysis of the Standardized Mean Difference in Education and Psychology [J].

Boedeker, Peter ;

Henson, Robin K. .

PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2020, 25 (03) :346-364

[45] Fixed-versus random-effects models in meta-analysis: Model properties and an empirical comparison of differences in results [J].

Schmidt, Frank L. ;

Oh, In-Sue ;

Hayes, Theodore L. .

BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 62 :97-128

[46] A brief note on the random-effects meta-analysis model and its relationship to other models [J].

McKenzie, Joanne E. ;

Veroniki, Areti Angeliki .

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024, 174

[47] A demonstration and evaluation of the use of cross-classified random-effects models for meta-analysis [J].

Belén Fernández-Castilla ;

Marlies Maes ;

Lies Declercq ;

Laleh Jamshidi ;

S. Natasha Beretvas ;

Patrick Onghena ;

Wim Van den Noortgate .

Behavior Research Methods, 2019, 51 :1286-1304

[48] Inference using an exact distribution of test statistic for random-effects meta-analysis [J].

Keisuke Hanada ;

Tomoyuki Sugimoto .

Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 2023, 75 :281-302

[49] A meta-analysis of DEA and SFA studies of the technical efficiency of seaports: A comparison of fixed and random-effects regression models [J].

Odeck, James ;

Brathen, Svein .

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2012, 46 (10) :1574-1585

[50] A demonstration and evaluation of the use of cross-classified random-effects models for meta-analysis [J].

Fernandez-Castilla, Belen ;

Maes, Marlies ;

Declercq, Lies ;

Jamshidi, Laleh ;

Beretvas, S. Natasha ;

Onghena, Patrick ;

Van den Noortgate, Wim .

BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2019, 51 (03) :1286-1304

← 1 2 3 4 5 →