Fast MCsquare-Based Independent Dose Verification Platform for Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy

被引:10
作者
Liu, Chunbo [1 ,2 ]
Ho, Meng Wei [2 ,3 ]
Park, Jiyeon [2 ,3 ]
Hsi, Wen Chien [2 ,3 ]
Liang, Xiaoying [2 ,3 ]
Li, Zuofeng [2 ,3 ]
Song, Yuntao [1 ,4 ]
Feng, Hansheng [4 ]
Zhang, Yawei [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Phys Sci, Hefei, Anhui, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Florida, Hlth Proton Therapy Inst, 2015 N Jefferson St, Jacksonville, FL 32206 USA
[3] Univ Florida, Dept Radiat Oncol, Gainesville, FL USA
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Hefei Inst Phys Sci, Hefei, Anhui, Peoples R China
关键词
pencil beam scanning; MCsquare; dose verification; Monte Carlo simulation; SIMULATION; IMPT;
D O I
10.1177/15330338211033076
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To commission MCsquare (a multi-cores CPU-based dose calculation engine) for pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy, integrate it into RayStation treatment plan system (TPS) to create a dedicated platform for fast independent dose verification. Method: A MCsquare-based independent dose verification platform (MC2InRS) was developed to realize automatic dose re-calculation for clinical use, including data preparation, dose calculation, 2D/3D gamma analysis. MCsquare was commissioned based on in-air lateral dose profiles, integrated depth dose, and the absolute dose of different beam energies for Proteus(R)ONE. MC2InRS was validated with measurement data using various targets and depths in a water phantom. This study also investigated 15 clinical cases to demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of MC2InRS platform in clinic practice. Results: Between simulation and measurement, the distal range differences at 80% (R80) and 20% (R20) dose levels for each energy were below 0.05 mm, and 0.1 mm, respectively, and the absolute dose differences were below 0.5%. 29 out of 36 QA planes reached a 100% gamma passing rate (GPR) for 2%/2mm criteria, and a minimum of 98.3% gamma was obtained in water phantom between simulation and measurement. For the 15 clinical cases investigated, the average 2D GPR (2%/2mm) was 95.4%, 99.3% for MCsquare vs. measurement, MCsquare vs. TPS, respectively. The average 3D GPR (2%/2mm) was 98.9%, 95.3% for MCsquare vs. TPS in water, and computed tomography (CT), respectively. Conclusion: MC2InRS, a fast, independent dose verification platform, has been developed to perform dose verification with high accuracy and efficiency for Pencil Bream Scanning (PBS). Its potential to be applied in routine clinical practice has also been discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [21] Improving spot-scanning proton therapy patient specific quality assurance with HPlusQA, a second-check dose calculation engine
    Mackin, Dennis
    Li, Yupeng
    Taylor, Michael B.
    Kerr, Matthew
    Holmes, Charles
    Sahoo, Narayan
    Poenisch, Falk
    Li, Heng
    Lii, Jim
    Amos, Richard
    Wu, Richard
    Suzuki, Kazumichi
    Gillin, Michael T.
    Zhu, X. Ronald
    Zhang, Xiaodong
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (12)
  • [22] Platform for automatic patient quality assurance via Monte Carlo simulations in proton therapy
    Marmitt, G. Guterres
    Pin, A.
    Siang, K. Ng Wei
    Janssens, G.
    Souris, K.
    Cohilis, M.
    Langendijk, J. A.
    Both, S.
    Knopf, A.
    Meijers, A.
    [J]. PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 70 : 49 - 57
  • [23] McGowan SE, 2013, BRIT J RADIOL, V86, DOI [10.1259.bjr.20120288, 10.1259/bjr.20120288]
  • [24] Reduced acute toxicity and improved efficacy from intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for the management of head and neck cancer
    McKeever, Matthew R.
    Sio, Terence T.
    Gunn, G. Brandon
    Holliday, Emma B.
    Blanchard, Pierre
    Kies, Merrill S.
    Weber, Randal S.
    Frank, Steven J.
    [J]. CHINESE CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 5 (04)
  • [25] Intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) - The future of IMRT for head and neck cancer
    Moreno, Amy C.
    Frank, Steven J.
    Garden, Adam S.
    Rosenthal, David I.
    Fuller, Clifton D.
    Gunn, Gary B.
    Reddy, Jay P.
    Morrison, William H.
    Williamson, Tyler D.
    Holliday, Emma B.
    Phan, Jack
    Blanchard, Pierre
    [J]. ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 88 : 66 - 74
  • [26] TOPAS: An innovative proton Monte Carlo platform for research and clinical applications
    Perl, J.
    Shin, J.
    Schuemann, J.
    Faddegon, B.
    Paganetti, H.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (11) : 6818 - 6837
  • [27] Commissioning of the world's first compact pencil-beam scanning proton therapy system
    Pidikiti, Rajesh
    Patel, Bijal C.
    Maynard, Matthew R.
    Dugas, Joseph P.
    Syh, Joseph
    Sahoo, Narayan
    Wu, Hsinshun Terry
    Rosen, Lane R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 19 (01): : 94 - 105
  • [28] Fast multipurpose Monte Carlo simulation for proton therapy using multi- and many-core CPU architectures
    Souris, Kevin
    Lee, John Aldo
    Sterpin, Edmond
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (04) : 1700 - 1712
  • [29] Results From the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core Houston's Anthropomorphic Phantoms Used for Proton Therapy Clinical Trial Credentialing
    Taylor, Paige A.
    Kry, Stephen F.
    Alvarez, Paola
    Keith, Tyler
    Lujano, Carrie
    Hernandez, Nadia
    Followill, David S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 95 (01): : 242 - 248
  • [30] Treatment planning comparison of IMPT, VMAT and 4π radiotherapy for prostate cases
    Tran, Angelia
    Zhang, Jingjing
    Woods, Kaley
    Yu, Victoria
    Dan Nguyen
    Gustafson, Gary
    Rosen, Lane
    Sheng, Ke
    [J]. Radiation Oncology, 2017, 12