Fast MCsquare-Based Independent Dose Verification Platform for Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy

被引:10
作者
Liu, Chunbo [1 ,2 ]
Ho, Meng Wei [2 ,3 ]
Park, Jiyeon [2 ,3 ]
Hsi, Wen Chien [2 ,3 ]
Liang, Xiaoying [2 ,3 ]
Li, Zuofeng [2 ,3 ]
Song, Yuntao [1 ,4 ]
Feng, Hansheng [4 ]
Zhang, Yawei [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Phys Sci, Hefei, Anhui, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Florida, Hlth Proton Therapy Inst, 2015 N Jefferson St, Jacksonville, FL 32206 USA
[3] Univ Florida, Dept Radiat Oncol, Gainesville, FL USA
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Hefei Inst Phys Sci, Hefei, Anhui, Peoples R China
关键词
pencil beam scanning; MCsquare; dose verification; Monte Carlo simulation; SIMULATION; IMPT;
D O I
10.1177/15330338211033076
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To commission MCsquare (a multi-cores CPU-based dose calculation engine) for pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy, integrate it into RayStation treatment plan system (TPS) to create a dedicated platform for fast independent dose verification. Method: A MCsquare-based independent dose verification platform (MC2InRS) was developed to realize automatic dose re-calculation for clinical use, including data preparation, dose calculation, 2D/3D gamma analysis. MCsquare was commissioned based on in-air lateral dose profiles, integrated depth dose, and the absolute dose of different beam energies for Proteus(R)ONE. MC2InRS was validated with measurement data using various targets and depths in a water phantom. This study also investigated 15 clinical cases to demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of MC2InRS platform in clinic practice. Results: Between simulation and measurement, the distal range differences at 80% (R80) and 20% (R20) dose levels for each energy were below 0.05 mm, and 0.1 mm, respectively, and the absolute dose differences were below 0.5%. 29 out of 36 QA planes reached a 100% gamma passing rate (GPR) for 2%/2mm criteria, and a minimum of 98.3% gamma was obtained in water phantom between simulation and measurement. For the 15 clinical cases investigated, the average 2D GPR (2%/2mm) was 95.4%, 99.3% for MCsquare vs. measurement, MCsquare vs. TPS, respectively. The average 3D GPR (2%/2mm) was 98.9%, 95.3% for MCsquare vs. TPS in water, and computed tomography (CT), respectively. Conclusion: MC2InRS, a fast, independent dose verification platform, has been developed to perform dose verification with high accuracy and efficiency for Pencil Bream Scanning (PBS). Its potential to be applied in routine clinical practice has also been discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] GEANT4-a simulation toolkit
    Agostinelli, S
    Allison, J
    Amako, K
    Apostolakis, J
    Araujo, H
    Arce, P
    Asai, M
    Axen, D
    Banerjee, S
    Barrand, G
    Behner, F
    Bellagamba, L
    Boudreau, J
    Broglia, L
    Brunengo, A
    Burkhardt, H
    Chauvie, S
    Chuma, J
    Chytracek, R
    Cooperman, G
    Cosmo, G
    Degtyarenko, P
    Dell'Acqua, A
    Depaola, G
    Dietrich, D
    Enami, R
    Feliciello, A
    Ferguson, C
    Fesefeldt, H
    Folger, G
    Foppiano, F
    Forti, A
    Garelli, S
    Giani, S
    Giannitrapani, R
    Gibin, D
    Cadenas, JJG
    González, I
    Abril, GG
    Greeniaus, G
    Greiner, W
    Grichine, V
    Grossheim, A
    Guatelli, S
    Gumplinger, P
    Hamatsu, R
    Hashimoto, K
    Hasui, H
    Heikkinen, A
    Howard, A
    [J]. NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2003, 506 (03) : 250 - 303
  • [2] Automated Monte-Carlo re-calculation of proton therapy plans using GEANT4/GATE: implementation and comparison to plan-specific quality assurance measurements
    Aitkenhead, Adam H.
    Sitch, Peter
    Richardson, Jenny C.
    Winterhalter, Carla
    Patel, Imran
    Mackay, Ranald, I
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 93 (1114)
  • [3] Geant4 developments and applications
    Allison, J
    Amako, K
    Apostolakis, J
    Araujo, H
    Dubois, PA
    Asai, M
    Barrand, G
    Capra, R
    Chauvie, S
    Chytracek, R
    Cirrone, GAP
    Cooperman, G
    Cosmo, G
    Cuttone, G
    Daquino, GG
    Donszelmann, M
    Dressel, M
    Folger, G
    Foppiano, F
    Generowicz, J
    Grichine, V
    Guatelli, S
    Gumplinger, P
    Heikkinen, A
    Hrivnacova, I
    Howard, A
    Incerti, S
    Ivanchenko, V
    Johnson, T
    Jones, F
    Koi, T
    Kokoulin, R
    Kossov, M
    Kurashige, H
    Lara, V
    Larsson, S
    Lei, F
    Link, O
    Longo, F
    Maire, M
    Mantero, A
    Mascialino, B
    McLaren, I
    Lorenzo, PM
    Minamimoto, K
    Murakami, K
    Nieminen, P
    Pandola, L
    Parlati, S
    Peralta, L
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2006, 53 (01) : 270 - 278
  • [4] Recent developments in GEANT4
    Allison, J.
    Amako, K.
    Apostolakis, J.
    Arce, P.
    Asai, M.
    Aso, T.
    Bagli, E.
    Bagulya, A.
    Banerjee, S.
    Barrand, G.
    Beck, B. R.
    Bogdanov, A. G.
    Brandt, D.
    Brown, J. M. C.
    Burkhardt, H.
    Canal, Ph.
    Cano-Ott, D.
    Chauvie, S.
    Cho, K.
    Cirrone, G. A. P.
    Cooperman, G.
    Cortes-Giraldo, M. A.
    Cosmo, G.
    Cuttone, G.
    Depaola, G.
    Desorgher, L.
    Dong, X.
    Dotti, A.
    Elvira, V. D.
    Folger, G.
    Francis, Z.
    Galoyan, A.
    Garnier, L.
    Gayer, M.
    Genser, K. L.
    Grichine, V. M.
    Guatelli, S.
    Gueye, P.
    Gumplinger, P.
    Howard, A. S.
    Hrivnacova, I.
    Hwang, S.
    Incerti, S.
    Ivanchenko, A.
    Ivanchenko, V. N.
    Jones, F. W.
    Jun, S. Y.
    Kaitaniemi, P.
    Karakatsanis, N.
    Karamitrosi, M.
    [J]. NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2016, 835 : 186 - 225
  • [5] AAPM task group 224: Comprehensive proton therapy machine quality assurance
    Arjomandy, Bijan
    Taylor, Paige
    Ainsley, Christopher
    Safai, Sairos
    Sahoo, Narayan
    Pankuch, Mark
    Farr, Jonathan B.
    Park, Sung Yong
    Klein, Eric
    Flanz, Jacob
    Yorke, Ellen D.
    Followill, David
    Kase, Yuki
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (08) : E678 - E705
  • [6] Beltran Chris, 2016, Int J Part Ther, V3, P312, DOI 10.14338/IJPT-16-00011.1
  • [7] RayStation: External beam treatment planning system
    Bodensteiner, Dayna
    [J]. MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2018, 43 (02) : 168 - 176
  • [8] Comparison of Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) to Passively Scattered Proton Therapy (PSPT) in the Treatment of Prostate Cancer
    Choi, S.
    Amin, M.
    Palmer, M.
    Zhu, X. R.
    Nguyen, Q.
    Pugh, T. J.
    Kuban, D. A.
    Lee, A. K.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (02): : S154 - S155
  • [9] Technical Note: Integrating an open source Monte Carlo code "MCsquare" for clinical use in intensity-modulated proton therapy
    Deng, Wei
    Younkin, James E.
    Souris, Kevin
    Huang, Sheng
    Augustine, Kurt
    Fatyga, Mirek
    Ding, Xiaoning
    Cohilis, Marie
    Bues, Martin
    Shan, Jie
    Stoker, Joshua
    Lin, Liyong
    Shen, Jiajian
    Liu, Wei
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : 2558 - 2574
  • [10] Ferrari A., 2005, CERN2005010, DOI [DOI 10.2172/877507, 10.5170/cern-2005-010, DOI 10.5170/CERN-2005]