Recommendations for Improving Recovery Criteria under the US Endangered Species Act

被引:45
|
作者
Doak, Daniel F. [1 ]
Boor, Gina K. Himes [2 ]
Bakker, Victoria J. [2 ]
Morris, William F. [3 ,4 ]
Louthan, Allison [1 ]
Morrison, Scott A. [5 ]
Stanley, Amanda [6 ]
Crowder, Larry B. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Environm Studies Program, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[2] Montana State Univ, Dept Ecol, Bozeman, MT 59717 USA
[3] Uppsala Univ, Dept Ecol & Genet, Uppsala, Sweden
[4] Duke Univ, Dept Biol, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[5] Nature Conservancy, San Francisco, CA USA
[6] Wilburforce Fdn, Seattle, WA USA
[7] Ctr Ocean Solut, Monterey, CA USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
conservation; ecology; population biology; extinction; endangered species; POPULATION VIABILITY ANALYSIS; CONSERVATION; PLANS; THREATS; EXTINCTION; MANAGEMENT; POLICY;
D O I
10.1093/biosci/biu215
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Recovery criteria, the thresholds mandated by the Endangered Species Act that define when species may be considered for downlisting or removal from the endangered species list, are a key component of conservation planning in the United States. We recommend improvements in the definition and scientific justification of recovery criteria, addressing both data-rich and data-poor situations. We emphasize the distinction between recovery actions and recovery criteria and recommend the use of quantitative population analyses to measure the impacts of threats and to explicitly tie recovery criteria to population status. To this end, we provide a brief tutorial on the legal and practical requirements and constraints of recovery criteria development. We conclude by contrasting our recommendations with other alternatives and by describing ways in which academic scientists can contribute productively to the planning process and to endangered species recovery.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 199
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Are we recovering? An evaluation of recovery criteria under the US Endangered Species Act
    Gerber, LR
    Hatch, LT
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2002, 12 (03) : 668 - 673
  • [2] Geography and Recovery under the US Endangered Species Act
    Carroll, Carlos
    Vucetich, John A.
    Nelson, Michael P.
    Rohlf, Daniel J.
    Phillips, Michael K.
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2010, 24 (02) : 395 - 403
  • [3] Editorial: Imperiled species recovery under the US Endangered Species Act
    Haines, Aaron
    Carter, Andrew
    Leu, Matthias
    Molano-Flores, Brenda
    Davis, Olivia
    FRONTIERS IN CONSERVATION SCIENCE, 2023, 4
  • [4] Improving peer review of listings and recovery plans under the Endangered Species Act
    Hecht, A
    Parkin, MJ
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2001, 15 (05) : 1269 - 1273
  • [5] Status of the Recovery Mandate Under Section 7(a)(1) of the US Endangered Species Act
    Evansen, Megan
    Harl, Heather
    Carter, Andrew
    Malcom, Jacob
    FRONTIERS IN CONSERVATION SCIENCE, 2021, 2
  • [6] Assisted colonization under the US Endangered Species Act
    Shirey, Patrick D.
    Lamberti, Gary A.
    CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2010, 3 (01): : 45 - 52
  • [7] The normative dimension and legal meaning of endangered and recovery in the US Endangered Species Act
    Vucetich, John A.
    Nelson, Michael P.
    Phillips, Michael K.
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2006, 20 (05) : 1383 - 1390
  • [8] By the Numbers: How is Recovery Defined by the US Endangered Species Act?
    Neel, Maile C.
    Leidner, Allison K.
    Haines, Aaron
    Goble, Dale D.
    Scott, J. Michael
    BIOSCIENCE, 2012, 62 (07) : 646 - 657
  • [9] Developing classification criteria under the US Endangered Species Act: Bowhead whales as a case study
    Shelden, KEW
    DeMaster, DP
    Rugh, DJ
    Olson, AM
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2001, 15 (05) : 1300 - 1307
  • [10] Critical habitat designation under the US Endangered Species Act: How are biological criteria used?
    Hodges, Karen E.
    Elder, Jason
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2008, 141 (10) : 2662 - 2668