Multidimensional Assessment of Beliefs About Emotion: Development and Validation of the Emotion and Regulation Beliefs Scale

被引:50
作者
Veilleux, Jennifer C. [1 ]
Salomaa, Anna C. [1 ]
Shaver, Jennifer A. [1 ]
Zielinski, Melissa J. [1 ]
Pollert, Garrett A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
关键词
emotion; emotion regulation; beliefs; IMPLICIT THEORIES; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; EXPERIENTIAL AVOIDANCE; INITIAL VALIDATION; DISTRESS TOLERANCE; DISORDERS; IDENTIFICATION; DYSREGULATION; PERSONALITY; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1177/1073191114534883
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Recent work has extended the idea of implicit self-theories to the realm of emotion to assess beliefs in the malleability of emotions. The current article expanded on prior measurement of emotion beliefs in a scale development project. Items were tested and revised over rounds of data collection with both students and nonstudent adult online participants. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses revealed a three-factor structure. The resulting scale, the Emotion and Regulation Beliefs Scale, assesses beliefs that emotions can hijack self-control, beliefs that emotion regulation is a worthwhile pursuit, and beliefs that emotions can constrain behavior. Preliminary findings suggest that the Emotion and Regulation Beliefs Scale has good internal consistency, is conceptually distinct from measures assessing individuals' beliefs in their management of emotions and facets of emotional intelligence, and predicts clinically relevant outcomes even after controlling for an existing short measure of beliefs in emotion controllability.
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 100
页数:15
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   One versus many: Capturing the use of multiple emotion regulation strategies in response to an emotion-eliciting stimulus [J].
Aldao, Amelia ;
Nolen-Hoeksema, Susan .
COGNITION & EMOTION, 2013, 27 (04) :753-760
[2]   Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review [J].
Aldao, Amelia ;
Nolen-Hoeksema, Susan ;
Schweizer, Susanne .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2010, 30 (02) :217-237
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, DONT LET EMOTIONS RU
[4]   Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness [J].
Baer, RA ;
Smith, GT ;
Hopkins, J ;
Krietemeyer, J ;
Toney, L .
ASSESSMENT, 2006, 13 (01) :27-45
[5]   Implicit self-theories of shyness [J].
Beer, JS .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 83 (04) :1009-1024
[6]   Psychometric properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) in clinical samples [J].
Brown, TA ;
Chorpita, BF ;
Korotitsch, W ;
Barlow, DH .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 1997, 35 (01) :79-89
[7]   Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data? [J].
Buhrmester, Michael ;
Kwang, Tracy ;
Gosling, Samuel D. .
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 6 (01) :3-5
[8]   MEASURING GENERALIZED EXPECTANCIES FOR NEGATIVE MOOD REGULATION - INITIAL SCALE DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLICATIONS [J].
CATANZARO, SJ ;
MEARNS, J .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 1990, 54 (3-4) :546-563
[9]   The architecture of personality [J].
Cervone, D .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2004, 111 (01) :183-204
[10]   Lay dispositionism and implicit theories of personality [J].
Chiu, CY ;
Hong, YY ;
Dweck, CS .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 73 (01) :19-30