Digital interventions to facilitate patient-provider communication in cancer care: A systematic review

被引:40
作者
Hong, Y. Alicia [1 ]
Hossain, Md Mahbub [2 ]
Chou, Wen-Ying Sylvia [3 ]
机构
[1] George Mason Univ, Dept Hlth Adm & Policy, Coll Hlth & Human Serv, 4400 Univ Dr,MS 1j3, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Hlth Promot & Community Hlth Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, College Stn, TX USA
[3] NCI, Hlth Commun & Informat Res Branch, Div Canc Control & Populat Sci, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
cancer patients; cancer survivors; digital intervention; patient-provider communication; review; LOCALIZED PROSTATE-CANCER; SHARED DECISION-MAKING; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; HEALTH-CARE; MANAGEMENT SUPPORT; SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT; SELF-MANAGEMENT; INTERNET; INFORMATION; SURVIVORS;
D O I
10.1002/pon.5310
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective Patient-provider communication is a critical component of cancer care. Digital tools have been applied to facilitate cancer care and patient-provider communication. However, to date, there is no systematic review on this growing body of literature. The objective of this study is to identify the existing digital interventions to improve patient-provider communication among cancer patients and survivors, summarize their characteristics, and synthesize the outcomes of these interventions. Methods We searched the databases of PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines with the following criteria: (a) empirical studies focusing on digital interventions to facilitate communication between cancer patients or survivors and their health care providers, (b) reporting qualitative or quantitative health outcomes of the cancer patients or survivors after the digital intervention, and (c) English articles published after 2000. Results The initial literature search generated 1006 articles; only 13 met the inclusion criteria. Most of the studies were conducted among breast, prostate, and lung cancer patients. Ten out of 13 studies used randomized controlled trials to evaluate intervention efficacy. The outcomes assessed included symptoms reporting and management, decision making, distress and quality of life, and utilization of health care. Most studies reported positive outcomes following the interventions. Conclusions The existing evidence on the number, characteristics, and outcomes of digital interventions to improve patient-provider communication suggests the preliminary efficacy of such interventions. It is essential to develop and implement more evidence-based digital interventions to engage patients, enhance patient-provider communication, and facilitate patient-centered decision making to improve patient-centered health outcomes, especially in underserved communities of cancer patients and survivors.
引用
收藏
页码:591 / 603
页数:13
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [1] Andrykowski Michael A, 2008, Semin Oncol Nurs, V24, P193, DOI 10.1016/j.soncn.2008.05.007
  • [2] Web-Based Versus Usual Care and Other Formats of Decision Aids to Support Prostate Cancer Screening Decisions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Baptista, Sofia
    Sampaio, Elvira Teles
    Heleno, Bruno
    Azevedo, Luis Filipe
    Martins, Carlos
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2018, 20 (06)
  • [3] The electronic self report assessment and intervention for cancer: promoting patient verbal reporting of symptom and quality of life issues in a randomized controlled trial
    Berry, Donna L.
    Hong, Fangxin
    Halpenny, Barbara
    Partridge, Anne
    Fox, Erica
    Fann, Jesse R.
    Wolpin, Seth
    Lober, William B.
    Bush, Nigel
    Parvathaneni, Upendra
    Amtmann, Dagmar
    Ford, Rosemary
    [J]. BMC CANCER, 2014, 14
  • [4] The Personal Patient Profile-Prostate decision support for men with localized prostate cancer: A multi-center randomized trial
    Berry, Donna L.
    Halpenny, Barbara
    Hong, Fangxin
    Wolpin, Seth
    Lober, William B.
    Russell, Kenneth J.
    Ellis, William J.
    Govindarajulu, Usha
    Bosco, Jaclyn
    Davison, B. Joyce
    Bennett, Gerald
    Terris, Martha K.
    Barsevick, Andrea
    Lin, Daniel W.
    Yang, Claire C.
    Swanson, Greg
    [J]. UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2013, 31 (07) : 1012 - 1021
  • [5] Pain Assessment with Short Message Service and Interactive Voice Response in Outpatients with Cancer and Pain: A Feasibility Study
    Besse, Kees T. C.
    Faber-te Boveldt, Nienke D.
    Janssen, Ge H. P.
    Vernooij-Dassen, Myrra
    Vissers, Kris C. P.
    Engels, Yvonne
    [J]. PAIN PRACTICE, 2016, 16 (03) : 320 - 326
  • [6] Borosund Elin, 2014, J Med Internet Res, V16, pe295, DOI 10.2196/jmir.3348
  • [7] Health Care in the Age of Interoperability Part 5: The Personal Health Record
    Braunstein, Mark L.
    [J]. IEEE PULSE, 2019, 10 (03) : 19 - 23
  • [8] A cohort study on mental disorders, stage of cancer at diagnosis and subsequent survival
    Chang, Chin-Kuo
    Hayes, Richard D.
    Broadbent, Matthew T. M.
    Hotopf, Matthew
    Davies, Elizabeth
    Moller, Henrik
    Stewart, Robert
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2014, 4 (01):
  • [9] A qualitative study on the design and development of an mHealth app to facilitate communication with the Deaf community: perspective of community pharmacists
    Chong, Elizabeth Yie-Chuen
    Palanisamy, Uma Devi
    Jacob, Sabrina Anne
    [J]. PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2019, 13 : 195 - 207
  • [10] Elmore Joann G., 2010, Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs, P204, DOI 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgq038