Dependence of yield strain of human trabecular bone on anatomic site

被引:533
作者
Morgan, EF
Keaveny, TM
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Mech Engn, Orthopaed Biomech Lab, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Orthopaed Surg, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Bioengn, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
cancellous bone; anatomic variation; yield strain; strength; biomechanics;
D O I
10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00011-2
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Understanding the dependence of human trabecular bone strength behavior on anatomic site provides insight into structure-function relationships and is essential to the increased success of site-specific finite element models of whole bones. To investigate the hypothesis that the yield strains of human trabecular bone depend on anatomic site, the uniaxial tensile and compressive yield properties were compared for cylindrical specimens from the vertebra (n = 61), proximal tibia (n = 31), femoral greater trochanter (n = 23), and femoral neck (n = 27) taken from 61 donors (67 +/- 15 years). Test protocols were used that minimized end artifacts and loaded specimens along the main trabecular orientation. Yield strains by site (mean +/- S.D.) ranged from 0.70 +/- 0.05% for the trochanter to 0.85 +/- 0.10% for the femoral neck in compression, from 0.61 +/- 0.05% for the trochanter to 0.70 +/- 0.05% for the vertebra in tension, and were always higher in compression than tension (p <0.001). The compressive yield strain was higher for the femoral neck than for all other sites (p <0.001). as was the tensile yield strain for the vertebra (p <0.007). Analysis of covariance, with apparent density as the covariate, indicated that inter-site differences existed in yield stress even after adjusting statistically for density (p <0.035). Coefficients of variation in yield strain within each site ranged from only 5-12%, consistent with the strong linear correlations (r(2) = 0.94-0.98) found between yield stress and modulus. These results establish that the yield strains of human trabecular bone can differ across sites, but that yield strain may be considered uniform within a given site despite substantial variation in elastic modulus and yield stress. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:569 / 577
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[11]   Constitutive relationships of fabric, density, and elastic properties in cancellous bone architecture [J].
Kabel, J ;
van Rietbergen, B ;
Odgaard, A ;
Huiskes, R .
BONE, 1999, 25 (04) :481-486
[12]  
Keaveny T.M., 1997, FORMA, V12, P267
[13]   Systematic and random errors in compression testing of trabecular bone [J].
Keaveny, TM ;
Pinilla, TP ;
Crawford, RP ;
Kopperdahl, DL ;
Lou, A .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 1997, 15 (01) :101-110
[14]   THEORETICAL-ANALYSIS OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ARTIFACT IN TRABECULAR BONE COMPRESSIVE MODULUS [J].
KEAVENY, TM ;
BORCHERS, RE ;
GIBSON, LJ ;
HAYES, WC .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1993, 26 (4-5) :599-607
[15]   TRABECULAR BONE EXHIBITS FULLY LINEAR ELASTIC BEHAVIOR AND YIELDS AT LOW STRAINS [J].
KEAVENY, TM ;
GUO, XE ;
WACHTEL, EF ;
MCMAHON, TA ;
HAYES, WC .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1994, 27 (09) :1127-+
[16]   DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE TENSILE AND COMPRESSIVE STRENGTHS OF BOVINE TIBIAL TRABECULAR BONE DEPEND ON MODULUS [J].
KEAVENY, TM ;
WACHTEL, EF ;
FORD, CM ;
HAYES, WC .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1994, 27 (09) :1137-1146
[17]   PREDICTING THE COMPRESSIVE MECHANICAL-BEHAVIOR OF BONE [J].
KELLER, TS .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1994, 27 (09) :1159-1168
[18]   Prediction of femoral fracture load using finite element models: an examination of stress- and strain-based failure theories [J].
Keyak, JH ;
Rossi, SA .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2000, 33 (02) :209-214
[19]   Yield strain behavior of trabecular bone [J].
Kopperdahl, DL ;
Keaveny, TM .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1998, 31 (07) :601-608
[20]   FRACTURE PREDICTION FOR THE PROXIMAL FEMUR USING FINITE-ELEMENT MODELS .2. NONLINEAR-ANALYSIS [J].
LOTZ, JC ;
CHEAL, EJ ;
HAYES, WC .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1991, 113 (04) :361-365