Levels of angiogenesis and expression of angiogenesis-related genes are prognostic for organ-specific metastasis of renal cell carcinoma

被引:82
作者
Fukata, S
Inoue, K [1 ]
Kamada, M
Kawada, C
Furihata, M
Ohtsuki, Y
Shuin, T
机构
[1] Kochi Med Sch, Dept Urol, Nanko Ku, Kochi 7838505, Japan
[2] Kochi Med Sch, Dept Pathol 2, Nanko Ku, Kochi 7838505, Japan
关键词
angiogenesis; metastasis; renal cell carcinoma; clear cell renal cell carcinoma;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.20887
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. To identify organ-specific, metastasis-related factors that can be used to predict the development and location of metastasis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CRCC), the authors assessed the angiogenesis and the expression of angiogenesis-related genes in primary and metastatic tumors. METHODS. They evaluated intratumoral microvessel density (VIVID) by immuno-histochemical staining, assessed the expression of angiogenesis- related genes by mRNA in situ hybridization, and determined the clinicopathologic characteristics of 92 archival specimens of primary and metastatic CRCCs from 54 patients. All 38 Department of Urology, Kochi Medical School, metastatic tumor specimens were resected from 24 patients. RESULTS. The pathologic stage (P = 0.026) of the primary tumor specimen was an important predictor for metastasis, as were MVD (P = 0.000025) and the ratio of School, Kochi, Japan. matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) to E-cadherin (M/E ratio; P = 0.000041). In addition, primary turner specimens resected from patients with metastatic CRCCs had high MVD, high levels of MMP-2 expression, and a high M/E ratio (P < 0.05). Relative to the primary tumors, the metastatic tumors also had high MVD), overexpression of basic fibroblast growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor, interleukin-8, MMPs, and a high M/E ratio (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that MVD and the M/E ratio in the primary tumor were independent prognostic factors for metastasis (P = 0.049 and P = 0.001, respectively). Furthermore, the M/E ratio in metastatic turner specimens resected from the long and lymph node was an independent prognostic factor for metastasis (P = 0.01823 and P = 0.03950, respectively). CONCLUSIONS. The Current study indicated that angiogenesis and M/E ratio were specific predictors for metastases of RCC, especially to the lung Or lymph node. Therefore, MMPs and E-cadherin could be relevant targets for novel therapeutic strategies to control or prevent the metastasis of RCC. (C) 2005 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:931 / 942
页数:12
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   VASCULAR-PERMEABILITY FACTOR (VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH-FACTOR) GENE IS EXPRESSED DIFFERENTIALLY IN NORMAL-TISSUES, MACROPHAGES, AND TUMORS [J].
BERSE, B ;
BROWN, LF ;
VANDEWATER, L ;
DVORAK, HF ;
SENGER, DR .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL, 1992, 3 (02) :211-220
[2]  
BRETHEAU D, 1995, CANCER, V76, P2543, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19951215)76:12<2543::AID-CNCR2820761221>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-S
[4]   A RAPID COLORIMETRIC INSITU MESSENGER-RNA HYBRIDIZATION TECHNIQUE USING HYPERBIOTINYLATED OLIGONUCLEOTIDE PROBES FOR ANALYSIS OF MDR1 IN MOUSE COLON-CARCINOMA CELLS [J].
BUCANA, CD ;
RADINSKY, R ;
DONG, ZY ;
SANCHEZ, R ;
BRIGATI, DJ ;
FIDLER, IJ .
JOURNAL OF HISTOCHEMISTRY & CYTOCHEMISTRY, 1993, 41 (04) :499-506
[5]   Tumor angiogenesis as a prognostic predictor in colorectal carcinoma with special reference to mode of metastasis and recurrence [J].
Choi, HJ ;
Hyun, MS ;
Jung, GJ ;
Kim, SS ;
Hong, SH .
ONCOLOGY, 1998, 55 (06) :575-581
[6]   Prognostic significance of microscopic vascularity for clear cell renal cell carcinoma [J].
Delahunt, B ;
Bethwaite, PB ;
Thornton, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 80 (03) :401-404
[7]  
Duensing S, 1995, ANTICANCER RES, V15, P2331
[8]   GENETIC-CONTROL OF CANCER METASTASIS [J].
FIDLER, IJ ;
RADINSKY, R .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1990, 82 (03) :166-168
[9]  
Fischer C, 1999, ANTICANCER RES, V19, P1513
[10]   PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE OF MORPHOLOGIC PARAMETERS IN RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA [J].
FUHRMAN, SA ;
LASKY, LC ;
LIMAS, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 1982, 6 (07) :655-663