In-plane seismic response of URM walls upgraded with FRP

被引:73
作者
ElGawady, MA
Lestuzzi, P
Badoux, M
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] EPFL, ENAC, IMAC, IS, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
关键词
Composite materials; Dynamic tests; Masonry; Retrofitting; Seismic effects; Walls;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2005)9:6(524)
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Recent earthquakes have shown the vulnerability of unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings. which have led to an increasing demand for techniques to upgrade URM buildings. Fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) call provide an upgrading alternative for URM buildings. This paper presents results of dynamic tests investigating the in-plane behavior of URM walls upgraded with FRP (URM-FRP). These tests represent pioneer work in this area (dynamic and in-plane). Five half-scale wills were built. Using half-scale brick clay units, and upgraded on one face only. Two moment/shear ratios (1.4 and 0.7), two mortar types (M2.5 and M9). three composite materials (carbon, aramid, and glass), three fiber structures (plates, loose fabric, and grids), and two upgrading configurations (diagonal "X" and full surface shapes) were investigated. The test specimens were subjected to a series of synthetic earthquake motions with increasing intensities on a uniaxial earthquake simulator. The tests validate the effectiveness of the one side upgrading: the upgrading technique improved the lateral resistance of the URM walls by a factor ranging from 1.3 to 2.9, however. the improvement in the lateral drift was less significant. Moreover, no uneven response was observed during the test due to the single side upgrading, Regarding the upgrading configurations, the bidirectional surface type materials (fabrics and grids) applied on the entire surface of the will (and correctly anchored) can help postpone the three classic failure modes of masonry walls: rocking ("flexural failure"). step cracking, and sliding ("shear failures"). Additionally, in some situations, they will postpone collapse by "keeping the bricks together" under large seismic deformation. On the other hand. the diagonal "X" shape was less successful and premature failure Was developed during the test.
引用
收藏
页码:524 / 535
页数:12
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] Abrams D. P., 2001, P KEERC MAE JOINT SE
  • [2] Strengthening of unreinforced masonry walls using FRPs
    Albert, ML
    Elwi, AE
    Cheng, JJR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPOSITES FOR CONSTRUCTION, 2001, 5 (02) : 76 - 84
  • [3] *CEN COM EUR BET, 1994, EUR 8
  • [4] EHSANI MR, 1999, J COMPOS CONSTR, V3, P134, DOI DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1999)3:3(134)
  • [5] ELGAWADY M, 2004, P 4 INT C ADV COMP M
  • [6] ELGAWADY MA, 2003, PUBLICATION IMAC ENA, V1
  • [7] Strengthening URM with GFRP composites and ductile connections
    Holberg, AM
    Hamilton, HR
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2002, 18 (01) : 63 - 84
  • [8] LESTUZZI P, 1999, 240 I STRUCT ENG SWI
  • [9] Schwegler G., 1994, P 10 EUR C EARTHQ EN, V3, P2299