A Dissimilarity-Weighted Sparse Self-Representation Method for Band Selection in Hyperspectral Imagery Classification

被引:79
作者
Sun, Weiwei [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Liangpei [1 ]
Zhang, Lefei [3 ]
Lai, Yenming Mark [4 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, State Key Lab Informat Engn Surveying Mapping & R, Wuhan 430079, Peoples R China
[2] Ningbo Univ, Coll Architectural Engn Civil Engn & Environm, Ningbo 315211, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Comp, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Maryland, Appl Math Stat & Sci Computat, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
Band selection; classification; dissimilarity-weighted sparse self-representation (DWSSR); hyperspectral imagery (HSI); TARGET DETECTION; DIMENSIONALITY REDUCTION; INFORMATION; DISTANCE;
D O I
10.1109/JSTARS.2016.2539981
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
A new dissimilarity-weighted sparse self-representation (DWSSR) method has been presented to select a proper band subset for hyperspectral imagery (HSI) classification. The DWSSR assumes that all the bands can be represented by the selected band subset, and it formulates sparse representation of all the bands into a sparse self-representation (SSR) model with row-sparsity constraint in the coefficient matrix. Furthermore, the DWSSR integrates a dissimilarity-weighted regularization term with the SSR model to avoid the issue of too-close bands encountered in the SSR. The regularization term explains the encoding cost of all bands with the representative bands, and a new composite dissimilarity measure which combines spectral information divergence with intraband correlation is implemented to estimate the encoding weight. The DWSSR program is solved by the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) framework, and the representative bands are finally selected according to the norm rankings of nonzero rows in the estimated coefficient matrix. Five groups of experiments on three popular HSI datasets are designed to test the performance of DWSSR in band selection, and five state-of-the-art methods are utilized to make comparisons. The results show that the DWSSR performs almost best among all the six methods, either in computational time or classification accuracies.
引用
收藏
页码:4374 / 4388
页数:15
相关论文
共 57 条
[31]  
Gong M., 2015, IEEE TRANS GEOSCI RE, V54, P554
[32]   Unsupervised Band Selection Based on Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization for Hyperspectral Images [J].
Gong, Maoguo ;
Zhang, Mingyang ;
Yuan, Yuan .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 54 (01) :544-557
[33]   Band, selection for hyperspectral image classification using mutual information [J].
Guo, Baofeng ;
Gunn, Steve R. ;
Damper, R. I. ;
Nelson, J. D. B. .
IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2006, 3 (04) :522-526
[34]   A Novel Ranking-Based Clustering Approach for Hyperspectral Band Selection [J].
Jia, Sen ;
Tang, Guihua ;
Zhu, Jiasong ;
Li, Qingquan .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 54 (01) :88-102
[35]   Distance metrics and band selection in hyperspectral processing with applications to material identification and spectral libraries [J].
Keshava, N .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2004, 42 (07) :1552-1565
[36]  
Koh KM, 2007, J MACH LEARN RES, V8, P1519
[37]   Clustering-based hyperspectral band selection using sparse nonnegative matrix factorization [J].
Li, Ji-ming ;
Qian, Yun-tao .
JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY-SCIENCE C-COMPUTERS & ELECTRONICS, 2011, 12 (07) :542-549
[38]   Hyperspectral modeling of ecological indicators - A new approach for monitoring former military training areas [J].
Luft, Laura ;
Neumann, Carsten ;
Freude, Matthias ;
Blaum, Niels ;
Jeltsch, Florian .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2014, 46 :264-285
[39]   Clustering-based hyperspectral band selection using information measures [J].
Martinez-Uso, Adolfo ;
Pla, Filiberto ;
Sotoca, Jose Martinez ;
Garcia-Sevilla, Pedro .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2007, 45 (12) :4158-4171
[40]  
MAUSEL PW, 1990, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V56, P55