Mental models of dynamic systems: taking stock and looking ahead

被引:79
作者
Groesser, Stefan N. [1 ,2 ]
Schaffernicht, Martin [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ St Gallen, Syst Dynam Grp, Inst Management, St Gallen, Switzerland
[2] Bern Univ Appl Sci, Dept Business, CH-3005 Bern, Switzerland
[3] Univ Talca, Fac Ciencias Empresariales, Coll Business Adm, Talca, Chile
关键词
DECISION-MAKING; COMPLEX-SYSTEMS; LOOP DOMINANCE; MISPERCEPTIONS; FEEDBACK; MANAGERIAL; SIMULATION; COGNITION; THINKING; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1002/sdr.476
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper deals with the representation of the conceptual structure of mental models of dynamic systems (MMDS). Heretofore, this structure has not been consistently defined. Consequently, studies about MMDS continue to use different conceptual structures to measure mental models. Even such properties as feedback loops and delays, which lie at the core of dynamic systems, are often not considered. This situation leads to incompatible findings and stagnating research. We review the literature about mental models in the field of system dynamics. In addition, we refer to dynamic systems theory as the mathematical basis for system dynamics to complement and validate our conceptual structure. One may conclude that most of the existing mental model studies measure only parts of the structure that we propose. The paper's contribution is to elaborate the conceptual structure of an MMDS and to use this structure to operationally enhance the definition of an MMDS. Copyright (c) 2012 System Dynamics Society
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 68
页数:23
相关论文
共 110 条
[11]   LOTKA-VOLTERRA PREDATOR PREY MODELS [J].
BILLARD, L .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PROBABILITY, 1977, 14 (02) :375-381
[12]  
Brown C., 1995, CHAOS CATASTROPHE TH
[13]   Effects of domain experience in the stock-flow failure [J].
Brunstein, Angela ;
Gonzalez, Cleotilde ;
Kanter, Steven .
SYSTEM DYNAMICS REVIEW, 2010, 26 (04) :347-354
[14]  
Bryson J.M., 2004, VISIBLE THINKING UNL
[15]   A system dynamics-based simulation experiment for testing mental model and performance effects of using the balanced scorecard [J].
Capelo, Carlos ;
Dias, Joao Ferreira .
SYSTEM DYNAMICS REVIEW, 2009, 25 (01) :1-34
[16]  
Craik K.J.W, 1952, The Nature of Explanation, V445
[17]   Understanding the building blocks of dynamic systems [J].
Cronin, Matthew A. ;
Gonzalez, Cleotilde .
SYSTEM DYNAMICS REVIEW, 2007, 23 (01) :1-17
[18]   Why don't well-educated adults understand accumulation? A challenge to researchers, educators, and citizens [J].
Cronin, Matthew A. ;
Gonzalez, Cleotilde ;
Sterman, John D. .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2009, 108 (01) :116-130
[19]   Richard Goodwin: A short appreciation [J].
Desai, M ;
Ormerod, P .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1998, 108 (450) :1431-1435
[20]   Ulysse: a qualitative tool for eliciting mental models of complex systems Methodological approach and application to regional development in Atlantic Canada [J].
Desthieux, Gilles ;
Joerin, Florent ;
Lebreton, Marcel .
SYSTEM DYNAMICS REVIEW, 2010, 26 (02) :163-192