Outcomes of ovarian stimulation and fertility preservation in breast cancer patients with different hormonal receptor profiles

被引:12
作者
Balayla, Jacques [1 ]
Tulandi, Togas [1 ]
Buckett, William [1 ]
Holzer, Hananel [1 ,2 ]
Steiner, Naama [1 ]
Shrem, Guy [1 ]
Volodarsky-Perel, Alexander [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 1001 Decarie Blvd, Montreal, PQ H4A 3J1, Canada
[2] Hadassah Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, IL-91120 Jerusalem, Israel
[3] Jewish Gen Hosp, Lady Davis Res Inst, 3755 Chemin Cote St Catherine, Montreal, PQ H3T 1E2, Canada
关键词
Triple-negative breast cancer; Fertility preservation; Number of oocytes; Estrogen receptor; Progesterone receptor; EMBRYO-TRANSFER; LIVE BIRTH; WOMEN; ESTROGEN; TAMOXIFEN; ASSOCIATION; EXPRESSION; MUTATIONS; FEATURES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s10815-020-01730-9
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Purpose To evaluate fertility preservation outcomes in breast cancer women with different hormonal receptor profiles before oncological treatment. Methods The study population included women with a diagnosis of breast cancer who underwent fertility preservation from 2009 until 2018 at a university-affiliated tertiary hospital. Stimulation parameters and fertility preservation outcomes were compared among the following receptor-specific profile groups: (1) estrogen receptor positive (ER+) versus estrogen receptor negative (ER-), (2) triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) versus estrogen and progesterone receptor positive (ER+/PR+), and (3) TNBC versus non-TNBC. Primary outcome was the total number of mature oocytes. Secondary outcomes included the number of retrieved oocytes, the peak estradiol level, and the number of follicles > 14 mm on the final oocyte maturation trigger day. Results A total of 155 cycles were included in the final analysis. These were divided into the exposure groups of ER+ (n = 97), ER- (n = 58), ER+/PR+ (n = 85), TNBC (n = 57), and non-TNBC (n = 98). Cycle outcomes revealed similar number of retrieved oocytes and follicles > 14 mm on the trigger day. Women with TNBC had significantly lower number of mature oocytes compared with those with ER + PR+ (7 (5-11) versus 9 (7-15); p = 0.02) and non-TNBC (7 (5-11) versus 9 (7-16); p = 0.01) status. Triple-negative breast cancer profile was associated with a significant reduction in the chance of developing over 10 mature oocytes (OR 0.41; 95% CI 0.19-0.92). Conclusion Among the different hormonal receptor profiles in breast cancer, the TNBC subtype has a negative effect on fertility preservation outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:913 / 921
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Fertility preservation in patients with early epithelial ovarian cancer
    Kwon, Yong-Soon
    Hahn, Ho-Suap
    Kim, Tae-Jin
    Lee, In-Ho
    Lim, Kyung-Taek
    Lee, Ki-Heon
    Shim, Jae-Uk
    Mok, Jung-Eun
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 20 (01) : 44 - 47
  • [32] A review of fertility preservation in patients with breast cancer
    Ulrich, Nicole D.
    Raja, Nicholas S.
    Moravek, Molly B.
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 82 : 60 - 68
  • [33] Controlled ovarian stimulation outcomes of fertility preservation procedures in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients: a retrospective study from a single-tertiary-IVF centre
    Sahin, Gulnaz
    Goker, Ege Nazan Tavmergen
    Gokmen, Erhan
    Yeniay, Levent
    Acet, Ferruh
    Zekioglu, Osman
    Tavmergen, Erol
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 42 (03) : 518 - 523
  • [34] Ovarian stimulation for emergency fertility preservation in cancer patients: A case series study
    Rashidi, Batool Hossein
    Tehrani, Ensiyeh Shahrokh
    Ghaffari, Firouzeh
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2014, 10 : 19 - 21
  • [35] Hereditary breast cancer and fertility preservation outcomes
    Suha Arab
    Togas Tulandi
    William Buckett
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2022, 39 : 1163 - 1168
  • [36] Breast cancer diagnosis following ovarian stimulation: Are the tumours different?
    Sonmezer, Murat
    Cil, Aylin Pelin
    Oktem, Ozgur
    Oktay, Kutluk
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2010, 21 (02) : 266 - 271
  • [37] Fertility preservation in breast cancer patients
    El Hachem, Hady
    Atallah, David
    Grynberg, Michael
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2014, 10 (10) : 1767 - 1777
  • [38] COH outcomes in breast cancer patients for fertility preservation: a comparison with the expected response by age
    Malacarne, Elisa
    Devesa, Marta
    Martinez, Francisca
    Rodriguez, Ignacio
    Coroleu, Buenaventura
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2020, 37 (12) : 3069 - 3076
  • [39] Fertility preservation in breast cancer patients
    Rodgers, Rachael J.
    MINERVA GINECOLOGICA, 2019, 71 (03): : 196 - 206
  • [40] Fertility Preservation in Patients with Breast Cancer
    Manuel, Emma
    Raja, Nicholas S.
    Moravek, Molly
    CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS, 2024, 16 (03) : 328 - 335