Deep, Sticky, Transient, and Gracious: An Expanded Buyer-Supplier Relationship Typology

被引:85
作者
Kim, Yusoon [1 ]
Choi, Thomas Y. [2 ]
机构
[1] Oregon State Univ, Coll Business, Operat & Supply Chain Management, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, WP Carey Sch Business, Purchasing Management, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
关键词
buyer-supplier relationship; typology; relational posture; relational intensity; relational outcomes; cooperative; adversarial; governance structure; STRATEGIC FLEXIBILITY; INDUSTRIAL-MARKETS; NETWORK STRUCTURE; SOCIAL-EXCHANGE; DARK SIDE; TRUST; PERFORMANCE; KNOWLEDGE; GOVERNANCE; EMBEDDEDNESS;
D O I
10.1111/jscm.12081
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The cooperative-adversarial dichotomy has served as the prevailing buyer-supplier relationship typology in the literature. Cooperative buyer-supplier relationships have been associated with closely tied relationships, while adversarial relationships have been equated to arms-length relationships. We propose, however, that this perspective is overly simplified; a cooperative relationship is orthogonal to a closely tied relationship and an adversarial relationship to an arms-length relationship. That is, there can be a closely tied yet adversarial relationship and an arms-length yet cooperative relationship. We theorize the buyer-supplier relationship in two orthogonal aspects(1) relational posture, that is, how two firms regard each other (as cooperative partners or as adversaries) and (2) relational intensity, that is, how much two firms' operations are interlinked (closely tied or arms-length). By considering the two aspects concurrently, this article proposes an expanded typology of buyer-supplier relationships. We label a closely tied and cooperative buyer-supplier type as deep; a closely tied but adversarial type as sticky; an arms-length and adversarial type as transient; and an arms-length but cooperative type as gracious. We then present an analysis that supports the orthogonality of the two relational dimensions. This analysis suggests that the expanded relationship types are associated with different relational outcome trade-offs. The data are collected from a global, large Japanese automaker and 163 of its suppliers in North America. Overall, the results provide empirical support for the expanded buyer-supplier relationship typology.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 86
页数:26
相关论文
共 141 条
[1]  
Allison P.D., 2012, Logistic regression using SAS: Theory and application
[2]  
Anand G, 2004, PROD OPER MANAG, V13, P369, DOI 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2004.tb00224.x
[3]   Emotions, trust and relationship development in business relationships: A conceptual model for buyer-seller dyads [J].
Andersen, Poul Houman ;
Kumar, Rajesh .
INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2006, 35 (04) :522-535
[4]  
Anderson E, 2005, MIT SLOAN MANAGE REV, V46, P75
[5]   SOME METHODS FOR RESPECIFYING MEASUREMENT MODELS TO OBTAIN UNIDIMENSIONAL CONSTRUCT MEASUREMENT [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1982, 19 (04) :453-460
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Structural Holes
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF02894565, DOI 10.1177/009207039502300410, DOI 10.1177/009207039502300414]
[8]   ESTIMATING NONRESPONSE BIAS IN MAIL SURVEYS [J].
ARMSTRONG, JS ;
OVERTON, TS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1977, 14 (03) :396-402
[9]   INTRAORGANIZATIONAL POWER AND ORGANIZATIONAL DESIGN: RECONCILING RATIONAL AND COALITIONAL MODELS OF ORGANIZATION [J].
Astley, W. Graham ;
Zajac, Edward J. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1991, 2 (04) :399-411
[10]   THE EVOLUTION OF COOPERATION [J].
AXELROD, R ;
HAMILTON, WD .
SCIENCE, 1981, 211 (4489) :1390-1396