Breast-Specific Sensuality and Appearance Satisfaction: Comparison of Breast-Conserving Surgery and Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy

被引:10
|
作者
Casaubon, Jesse T. [1 ]
Kuehn, Reed B. [1 ]
Pesek, Sarah E. [3 ]
Raker, Christina A. [2 ]
Edmonson, David A. [1 ]
Stuckey, Ashley [1 ]
Gass, Jennifer S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Brown Univ, Program Womens Oncol, Women & Infants Hosp Rhode Isl, Alpert Med Sch, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[2] Women & Infants Hosp Rhode Isl, Div Res, Providence, RI 02908 USA
[3] St Peters Hlth Partners, Breast Surg, Albany, NY USA
关键词
SURGICAL DECISION-MAKING; INCREASING USE; BODY-IMAGE; CANCER; OUTCOMES; TRENDS; RECONSTRUCTION; WOMEN; RATES; RADIOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.02.048
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: We demonstrated previously that lumpectomy (L) patients reported higher appearance satisfaction, appreciation of a pleasurable breast caress, and persistence of the breast during intimacy than mastectomy with reconstruction, which we used to describe breast-specific sensuality. Our current objective was to compare breast-specific sensuality between L and nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM). DESIGN: An anonymous, cross-sectional survey was distributed to breast cancer survivors between 2014 and 2016. Eligible patients underwent operation between 2000 and 2014, were adults older than 18 years, English-speaking, and at least one year into the post-operative period. Demographic characteristics, treatment details, Female Sexual Function Index metrics, and investigator-generated questions about appearance satisfaction and breast-specific sensuality were collected. RESULTS: Of the 600 women who participated, 585 surveys were eligible. Surgical modality was reported as L by 406 (69.4%), mastectomy alone by 50 (8.5%), and mastectomy with reconstruction by 129 (22.1%). Nipple-preservation data were available for 47 of 129 mastectomy with reconstruction patients (36.4%), with 21 NSM and 26 non-nipple-sparing mastectomy patients. Favorable postoperative appearance satisfaction was reported by 76.2% of L and 71.4% of NSM (p = 0.039). Lumpectomy patients reported feeling more comfortable being seen undressed than NSM patients (82.4% vs 71.4%; p = 0.0003). The chest remained a part of intimacy for 65.4% of L patients vs 42.9% of NSM patients (p = 0.0009). A pleasurable breast caress was reported more frequently by L patients than NSM patients (66.2% vs 20%; p <= 0.0001). The breast caress was unpleasant for 40% of NSM patients, nearly 4-fold higher than L patients (11.3%; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: NSM patients were significantly less satisfied with appearance, less comfortable being seen undressed, had decreased persistence of breast intimacy, and experienced a less pleasurable breast caress than L patients. Counseling patients about these findings will empower informed decision making, optimize expectations, and can enhance postoperative satisfaction. (C) 2020 by the American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:990 / 998
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Early Results of an Endoscopic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer
    Sakamoto N.
    Fukuma E.
    Higa K.
    Ozaki S.
    Sakamoto M.
    Abe S.
    Kurihara T.
    Tozaki M.
    Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2010, 1 (3) : 232 - 239
  • [32] Robotic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: The Next Step in the Evolution of Minimally Invasive Breast Surgery
    Selber, Jesse C.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 26 (01) : 10 - 11
  • [33] Robotic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: The Next Step in the Evolution of Minimally Invasive Breast Surgery
    Jesse C. Selber
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2019, 26 : 10 - 11
  • [34] Surgical Correction of Nipple Hypertrophy after Nipple-sparing Mastectomy with Breast Reconstruction
    Kawai, Kenichiro
    Fujiwara, Toshihiro
    Nishimoto, Soh
    Ishise, Hisako
    Saito, Takuya
    Nakajima, Koyo
    Kubo, Tateki
    Kakibuchi, Masao
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2023, 11 (07) : E5134
  • [35] Oncological safety of prophylactic breast surgery: skin-sparing and nipple-sparing versus total mastectomy
    van Verschuer, Victorien M. T.
    Maijers, Marike C.
    van Deurzen, Carolien H. M.
    Koppert, Linetta B.
    GLAND SURGERY, 2015, 4 (06) : 467 - 475
  • [36] National Patterns of Breast Reconstruction and Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer, 2005–2015
    Stephanie M. Wong
    Yoon S. Chun
    Yasuaki Sagara
    Mehra Golshan
    Jessica Erdmann-Sager
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2019, 26 : 3194 - 3203
  • [37] Clinical Breast Exam Is Adequate Surveillance Following Nipple-sparing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer
    Weed, Christina
    Wang, Ton
    Mohan, Srivarshini
    Tseng, Joshua
    Hu, Theodore
    Jutla, Jaswinder
    Boyle, Marissa
    Amersi, Farin
    Giuliano, Armando
    Chung, Alice
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (SUPPL 2) : S497 - S498
  • [38] Is nipple-sparing mastectomy with implant reconstruction for breast cancer safe and worthwhile?
    Regis, C.
    Mesdag, V.
    Tresch, E.
    Chauvet, M. P.
    Boulanger, L.
    Collinet, P.
    Giard, S.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 76
  • [39] Nipple-sparing Mastectomy in Breast Cancer: From an Oncologic Safety Perspective
    Huang Nai-Si
    Wu Jiong
    中华医学杂志英文版, 2015, 128 (16) : 2256 - 2261
  • [40] Robotic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction with Gel Implant
    Hung-Wen Lai
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2019, 26 : 53 - 54