Simulation-Based Sensitivity Analysis for Causal Mediation Studies

被引:16
|
作者
Qin, Xu [1 ]
Yang, Fan [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Educ, Dept Hlth & Human Dev, Off 5100 WWPH,230 South Bouquet St, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Dept Biostat & Informat, Denver, CO 80202 USA
关键词
causal mediation analysis; confounders; propensity score; sensitivity analysis; simulation; NATURAL DIRECT; INFERENCE; MODEL; IDENTIFICATION; ASSUMPTIONS; VARIABLES; BIAS;
D O I
10.1037/met0000340
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Causal inference regarding a hypothesized mediation mechanism relies on the assumptions that there are no omitted pretreatment confounders (i.e., confounders preceding the treatment) of the treatment-mediator, treatment-outcome, and mediator-outcome relationships, and there are no posttreatment confounders (i.e., confounders affected by the treatment) of the mediator-outcome relationship. It is crucial to conduct a sensitivity analysis to determine if a potential violation of the assumptions would easily change analytic conclusions. This article proposes a simulation-based method to assess the sensitivity to unmeasured pretreatment confounding, assuming no posttreatment confounding. It allows one to (a) quantify the strength of an unmeasured pretreatment confounder through its conditional associations with the treatment, mediator, and outcome; (b) simulate the confounder from its conditional distribution; and (c) finally assess its influence on both the point estimation and estimation efficiency by comparing the results before and after adjusting for the simulated confounder in the analysis. The proposed sensitivity analysis strategy can be implemented for any causal mediation analysis method. It is applicable to both randomized experiments and observational studies and to mediators and outcomes of different scales. A visualization tool is provided for vivid representations of the sensitivity analysis results. An R package mediationsens has been developed for researchers to implement the proposed method easily (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/mediationsens/index.html).
引用
收藏
页码:1000 / 1013
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Bayesian causal mediation analysis with multiple ordered mediators
    Gao, Tianming
    Albert, Jeffrey M.
    STATISTICAL MODELLING, 2019, 19 (06) : 634 - 652
  • [42] Causal Mediation Analysis with Multiple Mediators
    Daniel, R. M.
    De Stavola, B. L.
    Cousens, S. N.
    Vansteelandt, S.
    BIOMETRICS, 2015, 71 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [43] Simulation-Based Bayesian Analysis
    Plummer, Martyn
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF STATISTICS AND ITS APPLICATION, 2023, 10 : 401 - 425
  • [44] Causal mediation analysis
    Hicks, Raymond
    Tingley, Dustin
    STATA JOURNAL, 2011, 11 (04): : 605 - 619
  • [45] High-dimensional causal mediation analysis based on partial linear structural equation models
    Cai, Xizhen
    Zhu, Yeying
    Huang, Yuan
    Ghosh, Debashis
    COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2022, 174
  • [46] Simulation-based evaluation of evacuation effectiveness using driving behavior sensitivity analysis
    Kostovasili, Margarita
    Antoniou, Constantinos
    SIMULATION MODELLING PRACTICE AND THEORY, 2017, 70 : 135 - 148
  • [47] A Brief Primer on Conducting Regression-Based Causal Mediation Analysis
    Li, Yi
    Yoshida, Kazuki
    Kaufman, Jay S.
    Mathur, Maya B.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL TRAUMA-THEORY RESEARCH PRACTICE AND POLICY, 2023, 15 (06) : 930 - 938
  • [48] Conditional generative adversarial networks for individualized causal mediation analysis
    Huan, Cheng
    Sun, Rongqian
    Song, Xinyuan
    JOURNAL OF CAUSAL INFERENCE, 2024, 12 (01)
  • [49] Generalized causal mediation and path analysis: Extensions and practical considerations
    Albert, Jeffrey M.
    Cho, Jang Ik
    Liu, Yiying
    Nelson, Suchitra
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 28 (06) : 1793 - 1807
  • [50] Causal Models for Mediation Analysis: An Introduction to Structural Mean Models
    Zheng, Cheng
    Atkins, David C.
    Zhou, Xiao-Hua
    Rhew, Isaac C.
    MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 2015, 50 (06) : 614 - 631