Using remote sensing to monitor the spring phenology of Acadia National Park across elevational gradients

被引:3
作者
Liu, Yan [1 ,2 ]
MacKenzie, Caitlin McDonough [3 ,4 ]
Primack, Richard B. [4 ]
Hill, Michael J. [5 ,6 ]
Zhang, Xiaoyang [7 ]
Wang, Zhuosen [8 ,9 ]
Schaaf, Crystal B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts Boston, Sch Environm, Boston, MA 02125 USA
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Aerosp Informat Res Inst, Beijing 100094, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Maine, Climate Change Inst, Orono, ME 04469 USA
[4] Boston Univ, Dept Biol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[5] Flinders Univ S Australia, Coll Sci & Engn, Adelaide, SA 5042, Australia
[6] Univ North Dakota, Dept Earth Syst Sci & Policy, Grand Forks, ND 58202 USA
[7] South Dakota State Univ, Dept Geog & Geospatial Sci, Geospatial Sci Ctr Excellence, Brookings, SD 57007 USA
[8] Univ Maryland, Earth Syst Sci Interdisciplinary Ctr, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[9] NASA, Terr Informat Syst Lab, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
来源
ECOSPHERE | 2021年 / 12卷 / 12期
关键词
field observation; Landsat; mountainous region; spring phenology; VIIRS; LAND-SURFACE PHENOLOGY; TIME-SERIES; MODIS DATA; VEGETATION PHENOLOGY; VIIRS; REFLECTANCE; PRODUCTS; SCIENCE; RECONSTRUCTION; VARIABILITY;
D O I
10.1002/ecs2.3888
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Greenup dates and their responses to elevation and temperature variations across the mountains of Acadia National Park are monitored using remote sensing data, including Landsat 8 surface reflectances (at a 30-m spatial resolution) and VIIRS reflectances adjusted to a nadir view (gridded at a 500-m spatial resolution), during the 2013-2016 growing seasons. The 30-m resolution provides a better scale for studying the phenology variation across elevational gradients than the 500-m resolution, as greenup dates monitored at 30-m scale have better agreement with leaf-out dates recorded in the field alongside the north-south-oriented hiking trails on three of the park's tallest mountains (466 m, 418 m, and 380 m), and can provide landcover-specific analysis. The spring phenology responses to temperature and elevation vary among different spatial scales. Greenup dates of Acadia National Park monitored at 30-m scale show a weak advancing trend with higher spring temperature, while greenup dates monitored at 500 m show a weak delaying trend. The species mix within landcover at 30-m scale could weaken the advancing trend detected at field observation level. The landcover mix and elevation variation within 500-m scale could alter the spring phenology response to spring temperature variation. Greenup dates monitored at both 30-m and 500-m scales vary among different elevational zones, aspects, landcovers, and years. However, the relationship between greenup dates and elevation is rather weak.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Capabilities and limitations of Landsat and land cover data for aboveground woody biomass estimation of Uganda
    Avitabile, Valerio
    Baccini, Alessandro
    Friedl, Mark A.
    Schmullius, Christiane
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 117 : 366 - 380
  • [2] Mountain hydrology of the western United States
    Bales, Roger C.
    Molotch, Noah P.
    Painter, Thomas H.
    Dettinger, Michael D.
    Rice, Robert
    Dozier, Jeff
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2006, 42 (08)
  • [3] Land surface phenology, climatic variation, and institutional change: Analyzing agricultural land cover change in Kazakhstan
    de Beurs, KM
    Henebry, GM
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 89 (04) : 497 - 509
  • [4] Standardized phenology monitoring methods to track plant and animal activity for science and resource management applications
    Denny, Ellen G.
    Gerst, Katharine L.
    Miller-Rushing, Abraham J.
    Tierney, Geraldine L.
    Crimmins, Theresa M.
    Enquist, Carolyn A. F.
    Guertin, Patricia
    Rosemartin, Alyssa H.
    Schwartz, Mark D.
    Thomas, Kathryn A.
    Weltzin, Jake F.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOMETEOROLOGY, 2014, 58 (04) : 591 - 601
  • [5] Citizen Science as an Ecological Research Tool: Challenges and Benefits
    Dickinson, Janis L.
    Zuckerberg, Benjamin
    Bonter, David N.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY, EVOLUTION, AND SYSTEMATICS, VOL 41, 2010, 41 : 149 - 172
  • [6] Forecasting phenology: from species variability to community patterns
    Diez, Jeffrey M.
    Ibanez, Ines
    Miller-Rushing, Abraham J.
    Mazer, Susan J.
    Crimmins, Theresa M.
    Crimmins, Michael A.
    Bertelsen, C. David
    Inouye, David W.
    [J]. ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2012, 15 (06) : 545 - 553
  • [7] Land surface phenology of North American mountain environments using moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer data
    Dunn, Allisyn Hudson
    de Beurs, Kirsten M.
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 115 (05) : 1220 - 1233
  • [8] Effects of temperature, phase type and timing, location, and human density on plant phenological responses in Europe
    Estrella, Nicole
    Sparks, Tim H.
    Menzel, Annette
    [J]. CLIMATE RESEARCH, 2009, 39 (03) : 235 - 248
  • [9] Alpine grassland phenology as seen in AVHRR, VEGETATION, and MODIS NDVI time series - a comparison with in situ measurements
    Fontana, Fabio
    Rixen, Christian
    Jonas, Tobias
    Aberegg, Gabriel
    Wunderle, Stefan
    [J]. SENSORS, 2008, 8 (04) : 2833 - 2853
  • [10] MODIS Collection 5 global land cover: Algorithm refinements and characterization of new datasets
    Friedl, Mark A.
    Sulla-Menashe, Damien
    Tan, Bin
    Schneider, Annemarie
    Ramankutty, Navin
    Sibley, Adam
    Huang, Xiaoman
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 114 (01) : 168 - 182