Analysis of factors for conversion of laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy: a prospective study of 703 patients with acute cholecystitis

被引:15
作者
Dominguez, Luis C. [1 ,2 ]
Rivera, Aura [1 ]
Bermudes, Charles [1 ]
Herrera, Wilmar [1 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Javeriana, Hosp Univ San Ignacio, Dept Cirugia, Bogota, Colombia
[2] Univ Sabana, Chia, Colombia
来源
CIRUGIA ESPANOLA | 2011年 / 89卷 / 05期
关键词
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Risk factors; Conversion; Morbidity; Mortality; Hospital stay; RISK-FACTORS; EXPERIENCE; COMPLICATIONS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; SURGERY; NEED;
D O I
10.1016/j.ciresp.2011.01.009
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims: Conversions to open surgery during laparoscopic cholecystectomy are performed in 20% of patients with acute cholecystitis, and are associated with increased morbidity and costs. The aim of this study was to identify predictive factors for conversion and to evaluate morbidity, mortality and hospital stay. Methods: A prospective cohort of patients admitted to the emergency department with acute cholecystitis. We evaluated the statistical significance of the demographic, clinical, biochemical, imaging and surgical factors at admission, associated with conversion to open surgery using a univariate model. The associated factors evaluated during initial analysis were then included in a multivariate analysis. Finally a comparative analysis was made of the morbidity and mortality in both models. Results: A total of 703 patients were included. Conversion rate was 13.8%. Univariate analysis identified as factors: male gender, previous ERCP, leucocytes > 12,000 mm(3), age > 70 years, hypertension, jaundice, cholangitis, total bilirubin > 2 mg/dl, ASA III-IV, gallbladder wall enlargement and choledocholithiasis. Logistic regression identified as predictive factors: previous ERCP, leucocytes, age > 70 years and male gender. Converted patients had a higher morbidity rate, further operations and longer hospital stays (P < .001). No difference was seen in mortality. Discussion: It is important to recognise patients with a higher risk of conversion in order to optimise planning and performing of the surgical procedure, and to decrease the morbidity associated with laparotomy, given that the independent factors identified are not modifiable. (C) 2010 AEC. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:300 / 306
页数:7
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
ARANGO L, 2000, REV COLOMB CIR, V15, P1
[2]  
BALLAL M, 2008, SURG ENDOSC, V42, P712
[3]   THE LOS-ANGELES EXPERIENCE WITH LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY [J].
BERCI, G ;
SACKIER, JM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1991, 161 (03) :382-384
[4]  
Blanco JAP, 1999, REV ESP ENFERM DIG, V91, P362
[5]   Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: Can the need for conversion and the probability of complications be predicted? A prospective study [J].
Brodsky, A ;
Matter, I ;
Sabo, E ;
Cohen, A ;
Abrahamson, J ;
Eldar, S .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2000, 14 (08) :755-760
[6]   THE EUROPEAN EXPERIENCE WITH LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY [J].
CUSCHIERI, A ;
DUBOIS, F ;
MOUIEL, J ;
MOURET, P ;
BECKER, H ;
BUESS, G ;
TREDE, M ;
TROIDL, H .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1991, 161 (03) :385-387
[7]  
Eldar S, 2002, WORLD J SURG, V26, P79
[8]   Burden of Digestive Diseases in the United States Part I: Overall and Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases [J].
Everhart, James E. ;
Ruhl, Constance E. .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 136 (02) :376-386
[9]   FACTORS DETERMINING CONVERSION TO LAPAROTOMY IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY [J].
FRIED, GM ;
BARKUN, JS ;
SIGMAN, HH ;
JOSEPH, L ;
CLAS, D ;
GARZON, J ;
HINCHEY, EJ ;
MEAKINS, JL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1994, 167 (01) :35-41
[10]   Risk factors for perioperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy:: Analysis of 22,953 consecutive cases from the swiss association of laparoscopic and thoracoscopic surgery database [J].
Giger, Urs F. ;
Michel, Jean-Marie ;
Opitz, Isabelle ;
Inderbitzin, Devdas Th ;
Kocher, Thomas ;
Kraehenbuehl, Lukas .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2006, 203 (05) :723-728