Iterative denoising accelerated 3D SPACE FLAIR sequence for brain MR imaging at 3T

被引:11
作者
Eliezer, Michael [1 ,2 ]
Vaussy, Alexis [3 ]
Toupin, Solenn [3 ]
Barbe, Remy [1 ]
Kannengiesser, Stephan [4 ]
Stemmer, Alto [4 ]
Houdart, Emmanuel [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Lariboisiere Univ Hosp, Dept Neuroradiol, F-75010 Paris, France
[2] Univ Paris, Fac Med, F-75010 Paris, France
[3] Siemens Healthineers France, F-93210 St Denis, France
[4] Siemens Healthineers, D-91052 Erlangen, Germany
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); 3D FLAIR; Iterative denoising; Brain MRI; MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS; 2D FLAIR; SUPPRESSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.diii.2021.09.004
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate image quality of three-dimensional fluid attenuated inversion recovery (3D-FLAIR) sequence acquired with a high acceleration factor and reconstructed with iterative denoising (ID) for brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3-T. Material and methods: Patients with brain tumor who underwent brain MRI were consecutively included. Two 3D-FLAIR sequences were successively performed for each patient. A first conventional FLAIR acquisition (conv-FLAIR) was performed with an acceleration factor of 6. The second acquisition was performed with an increased acceleration factor of 9. Two series one without ID (acc-FLAIR) and one with ID (acc-FLAIR-ID) were reconstructed. Two neuroradiologists independently assessed image quality, deep brain nuclei visualization and white matter/gray matter (WM/GM) differentiation on a 4-point scale. Results: Thirty patients with brain tumor were consecutively included in this study. There were 16 women and 14 men with a mean age of 54 +/- 17 (SD) years (range: 22-78 years). Scanning time of Acc-FLAIR-ID and Acc-FLAIR (4 min 40 sec) was 37% shorter than that of conv-FLAIR (2 min 50 sec) (P < 0.01). Improved image quality score was significantly different for both conv-FLAIR and acc-FLAIR-ID compared to acc-FLAIR (P < 0.01 for both). WM/GM differentiation score of conv-FLAIR was not significantly different compared to accFLAIR-ID (P = 0.10). Improved WM/GM differentiation score was different for both sequences compared to acc-FLAIR (P = 0.017 and P < 0.001). Deep brain nuclei visualization score was not different between convFLAIR and acc-FLAIR-ID (P = 0.71). However, the improved deep brain nuclei visualization score was signifi-cantly different for both sequences compared to acc-FLAIR (P < 0.001 for both). Conclusion: Scanning time of 3D-FLAIR sequence using a high acceleration factor reconstructed with ID algorithm can be reduced by 37% while preserving image quality for brain MRI. (c) 2021 Societe francaise de radiologie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 20
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessment of Cochlea Endolymphatic Hydrops Using 3-D FLAIR and 3-D Real IR Sequence in Guinea Pigs via 3T MRI After Intratympanic Gadolinium: A Histopathological Comparison
    Wang, Feng
    Lyu, Huiying
    Zhao, Menglong
    Sha, Yan
    Zhang, Fang
    Cheng, Yushu
    Huang, Wenhu
    Tang, Wenlin
    Xie, Youzhou
    Lu, Ping
    [J]. OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2017, 38 (04) : 585 - 590
  • [22] Comparison of 3D double inversion recovery and 2D STIR FLAIR MR sequences for the imaging of optic neuritis: pilot study
    Jérôme Hodel
    Olivier Outteryck
    Anne-Laure Bocher
    Hélène Zéphir
    Oriane Lambert
    Mohamed Amine Benadjaoud
    David Chechin
    Jean-Pierre Pruvo
    Patrick Vermersch
    Xavier Leclerc
    [J]. European Radiology, 2014, 24 : 3069 - 3075
  • [23] Contrast-Enhanced 3D Spin Echo T1-Weighted Sequence Outperforms 3D Gradient Echo T1-Weighted Sequence for the Detection of Multiple Sclerosis Lesions on 3.0 T Brain MRI
    de Panafieu, Ariane
    Lecler, Augustin
    Goujon, Adrien
    Krystal, Sidney
    Gueguen, Antoine
    Sadik, Jean-Claude
    Savatovsky, Julien
    Duron, Loic
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2023, 58 (05) : 314 - 319
  • [24] Comparison between contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed 3D FLAIR brain MR images and T2-weighted orbital MR images at 3 Tesla for the diagnosis of acute optic neuritis
    Manasse, Sharmiladevi
    Koskas, Patricia
    Savatovsky, Julien
    Deschamps, Romain
    Vignal-Clermont, Catherine
    de la Motte, Marine Boudot
    Papeix, Caroline
    Trunet, Stephanie
    Lecler, Augustin
    [J]. DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2024, 105 (12) : 481 - 488
  • [25] Metal artifacts from titanium and steel screws in CT, 1.5T and 3T MR images of the tibial Pilon: a quantitative assessment in 3D
    Radzi, Shairah
    Cowin, Gary
    Robinson, Mark
    Pratap, Jit
    Volp, Andrew
    Schuetz, Michael A.
    Schmutz, Beat
    [J]. QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2014, 4 (03) : 163 - 172
  • [26] Ovarian Masses: MR Imaging with T1-weighted 3-dimensional Gradient-echo IDEAL Water-fat Separation Sequence at 3T
    Hori, Masatoshi
    Kim, Tonsok
    Onishi, Hiromitsu
    Nakamoto, Atsushi
    Tsuboyama, Takahiro
    Tatsumi, Mitsuaki
    Tomiyama, Noriyuki
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2012, 11 (02) : 117 - 127
  • [27] Normal Findings on Brain Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery MR Images at 3T
    Neema, M.
    Guss, Z. D.
    Stankiewicz, J. M.
    Arora, A.
    Healy, B. C.
    Bakshi, R.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2009, 30 (05) : 911 - 916
  • [28] Atlas-Based Adaptive Hadamard-Encoded MR Spectroscopic Imaging at 3T
    Liu, Huawei
    Autry, Adam W.
    Larson, Peder E. Z.
    Xu, Duan
    Li, Yan
    [J]. TOMOGRAPHY, 2023, 9 (05) : 1592 - 1602
  • [29] Axial 3D gradient-echo imaging for improved multiple sclerosis lesion detection in the cervical spinal cord at 3T
    Arzu Ozturk
    Nafi Aygun
    Seth A. Smith
    Brian Caffo
    Peter A. Calabresi
    Daniel S. Reich
    [J]. Neuroradiology, 2013, 55 : 431 - 439
  • [30] Axial 3D gradient-echo imaging for improved multiple sclerosis lesion detection in the cervical spinal cord at 3T
    Ozturk, Arzu
    Aygun, Nafi
    Smith, Seth A.
    Caffo, Brian
    Calabresi, Peter A.
    Reich, Daniel S.
    [J]. NEURORADIOLOGY, 2013, 55 (04) : 431 - 439