Senescent effects on binocular summation for contrast sensitivity and spatial interval acuity

被引:28
|
作者
Gagnon, RWC [1 ]
Kline, DW [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Dept Psychol, Vis & Aging Lab, PACE, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
关键词
spatial interval discrimination; hyperacuity; binocular summation; aging; contrast sensitivity;
D O I
10.1076/ceyr.27.5.315.17225
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose. Age effects on binocular summation, a cortically mediated visual function, were compared for resolution acuity, contrast sensitivity (CS), and spatial interval (SI) hyperacuity. Method. The binocular and monocular thresholds of healthy, optimally-corrected healthy young (mean age 21.3 years) and old (mean age 69.9 years) observers were determined for acuity, Sl discrimination, and CS at 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 8.0 and 18.0 c/deg. Results. No age effects were observed on monocular or binocular Sl discrimination. The binocular summation ratios (BSRs) did not exceed the expected probability gain for resolution acuity or SI discrimination in either age group. Older observers showed a binocular inhibition effect on the SI task. On the CS task, the BSRs of the young significantly exceeded those of the old only at 18.0 c/deg. Conclusions. 1.) Binocular summation of high spatial frequency contrast information, which may be less robust in the senescent visual system, did not appear to be related to interocular CS differences, 2.) Sl discrimination of high contrast, well-separated targets appears to be unaffected by aging, and 3.) Binocular neural summation on SI discrimination may be more likely to be seen with targets that are narrowly separated or low in contrast.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 321
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Visual Performance in the "Real World": Contrast Sensitivity, Visual Acuity, and Effects of Macular Carotenoids
    Roark, Mark W.
    Stringham, James M.
    MOLECULAR NUTRITION & FOOD RESEARCH, 2019, 63 (15)
  • [42] EFFECTS OF SPHERICAL AND ASTIGMATIC DEFOCUS ON ACUITY AND CONTRAST SENSITIVITY - A COMPARISON OF 3 CLINICAL CHARTS
    BRADLEY, A
    THOMAS, T
    KALAHER, M
    HOERRES, M
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 1991, 68 (06) : 418 - 426
  • [43] Reversibility of effects of orthokeratology on visual acuity, refractive error, corneal topography, and contrast sensitivity
    Kobayashi, Yasuko
    Yanai, Ryoji
    Chikamoto, Nobuhiko
    Chikama, Tai-ichiro
    Ueda, Kiichi
    Nishida, Teruo
    EYE & CONTACT LENS-SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2008, 34 (04): : 224 - 228
  • [44] Relationship among fMRI, contrast sensitivity and visual acuity
    Leguire, L. E.
    Algaze, A.
    Kashou, N. H.
    Lewis, J.
    Rogers, G. L.
    Roberts, C.
    BRAIN RESEARCH, 2011, 1367 : 162 - 169
  • [45] Neonatal Contrast Sensitivity and Visual Acuity: Basic Psychophysics
    Brown, Angela M.
    Opoku, Faustina Ottie
    Stenger, Michael R.
    TRANSLATIONAL VISION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 7 (03):
  • [46] Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity Testing for Sports Vision
    Zimmerman, Aaron B.
    Lust, Kimberly L.
    Bullimore, Mark A.
    EYE & CONTACT LENS-SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2011, 37 (03): : 153 - 159
  • [47] BINOCULAR PERFORMANCE IN PATIENTS WITH UNILATERAL CATARACT USING THE REGAN TEST - BINOCULAR SUMMATION AND INHIBITION WITH LOW-CONTRAST CHARTS
    PARDHAN, S
    EYE, 1993, 7 : 59 - 62
  • [48] Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity for individual Sloan letters
    Alexander, KR
    Xie, W
    Derlacki, DJ
    VISION RESEARCH, 1997, 37 (06) : 813 - 819
  • [49] Normative Reference Ranges for Binocular Summation as a Function of Age for Low Contrast Letter Charts
    Pineles, Stacy L.
    Velez, Federico G.
    Yu, Fei
    Demer, Joseph L.
    Birch, Eileen
    STRABISMUS, 2014, 22 (04) : 167 - 175
  • [50] Keratoconus stage impact on visual acuity and contrast sensitivity
    Lidum, Sanita
    Luguzis, Artis
    Krumina, Gunta
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2020: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2020, 11312