Senescent effects on binocular summation for contrast sensitivity and spatial interval acuity

被引:28
|
作者
Gagnon, RWC [1 ]
Kline, DW [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Dept Psychol, Vis & Aging Lab, PACE, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
关键词
spatial interval discrimination; hyperacuity; binocular summation; aging; contrast sensitivity;
D O I
10.1076/ceyr.27.5.315.17225
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose. Age effects on binocular summation, a cortically mediated visual function, were compared for resolution acuity, contrast sensitivity (CS), and spatial interval (SI) hyperacuity. Method. The binocular and monocular thresholds of healthy, optimally-corrected healthy young (mean age 21.3 years) and old (mean age 69.9 years) observers were determined for acuity, Sl discrimination, and CS at 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 8.0 and 18.0 c/deg. Results. No age effects were observed on monocular or binocular Sl discrimination. The binocular summation ratios (BSRs) did not exceed the expected probability gain for resolution acuity or SI discrimination in either age group. Older observers showed a binocular inhibition effect on the SI task. On the CS task, the BSRs of the young significantly exceeded those of the old only at 18.0 c/deg. Conclusions. 1.) Binocular summation of high spatial frequency contrast information, which may be less robust in the senescent visual system, did not appear to be related to interocular CS differences, 2.) Sl discrimination of high contrast, well-separated targets appears to be unaffected by aging, and 3.) Binocular neural summation on SI discrimination may be more likely to be seen with targets that are narrowly separated or low in contrast.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 321
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Binocular capture: The effects of spatial frequency and contrast polarity of the monocular target
    Raghunandan, Avesh
    VISION RESEARCH, 2011, 51 (23-24) : 2369 - 2377
  • [32] Binocular recognition summation in the peripheral visual field: contrast and orientation dependence
    Pardhan, S
    VISION RESEARCH, 2003, 43 (11) : 1249 - 1255
  • [33] CONTRAST SENSITIVITY AND VERNIER ACUITY IN AMBLYOPIC MONKEYS
    KIORPES, L
    KIPER, DC
    MOVSHON, JA
    VISION RESEARCH, 1993, 33 (16) : 2301 - 2311
  • [34] VISUAL-ACUITY AND CONTRAST SENSITIVITY IN THE ELDERLY
    HIRVELA, H
    KOSKELA, P
    LAATIKAINEN, L
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1995, 73 (02): : 111 - 115
  • [35] Effect of induced anisometropia on binocular through-focus contrast sensitivity
    Legras, R
    Hornain, V
    Monot, A
    Chateau, N
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2001, 78 (07) : 503 - 509
  • [36] GRATING AND FLICKER SENSITIVITY IN THE NEAR AND FAR PERIPHERY - NASO-TEMPORAL ASYMMETRIES AND BINOCULAR SUMMATION
    GRIGSBY, SS
    TSOU, BH
    VISION RESEARCH, 1994, 34 (21) : 2841 - 2848
  • [37] EFFECTS OF LUMINANCE AND SPATIAL NOISE ON INTERFEROMETRIC CONTRAST SENSITIVITY
    COLETTA, NJ
    SHARMA, V
    JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1995, 12 (10): : 2244 - 2251
  • [38] Predicting individual contrast sensitivity functions from acuity and letter contrast sensitivity measurements
    Thurman, Steven M.
    Davey, Pinakin Gunvant
    McCray, Kaydee Lynn
    Paronian, Violeta
    Seitz, Aaron R.
    JOURNAL OF VISION, 2016, 16 (15):
  • [39] Standard Automated Perimetry: Determining Spatial Summation and Its Effect on Contrast Sensitivity Across the Visual Field
    Khuu, Sieu K.
    Kalloniatis, Michael
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2015, 56 (06) : 3565 - 3576
  • [40] THE IMPORTANCE OF MEASURING BINOCULAR CONTRAST SENSITIVITY IN UNILATERAL CATARACT
    PARDHAN, S
    GILCHRIST, J
    EYE, 1991, 5 : 31 - 35