Multi-Criteria Decision Making: A Systematic Review

被引:37
作者
Azhar, Nayli Adriana [1 ]
Radzi, Nurul Asyikin Mohamed [1 ,2 ]
Ahmad, Wan Siti Halimatul Munirah Wan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tenaga Nas, Coll Engn, Elect & Elect Engn Dept, Kajang 43000, Malaysia
[2] Univ Tenaga Nas, Inst Informat & Comp Energy, Kajang 43000, Malaysia
关键词
multi-criteria decision making; industrial decision making; analytical hierarchy process; analytical network process; electre; vikor; topsis; promethee; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; OPTIMAL SITE SELECTION; NETWORK PROCESS; MCDM METHODS; HEALTH-CARE; ELECTRE TRI; AHP; ENERGY; VIKOR; TOPSIS;
D O I
10.2174/2352096514666211029112443
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) helps decision makers (DMs) solve highly complex problems. Accordingly, MCDM has been widely used by DMs from various fields as an effective and reliable tool for solving various problems, such as in site and supplier selection, ranking and assessment. This work presents an in-depth survey of past and recent MCDM techniques cited in the literature. These techniques are mainly categorised into pairwise comparison, outranking and distance-based approaches. Some well-known MCDM methods include the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Analytical Network Process (ANP), Elimination et Choix Traduisant la Realite (ELECTRE), Preference Ranking Organization METHod for Enrichment of Evaluations (PROMETHEE), Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and VIseKrite-rijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR). Each of these methods is unique and has been used in a vast field of interest to support DMs in solving complex problems. For a complete survey, discussions related to previous issues and challenges and the current implementation of MCDM are also presented.
引用
收藏
页码:779 / 801
页数:23
相关论文
共 114 条
  • [1] Abdullah Lazim, 2019, Journal of Industrial Engineering International, V15, P271, DOI 10.1007/s40092-018-0289-z
  • [2] ELECTRE I Based Relevance Decision-Makers Feedback to the Location Selection of Distribution Centers
    Agrebi, Maroi
    Abed, Mourad
    Omri, Andmohamed Nazih
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION, 2017,
  • [3] The implementation of BORDA and PROMETHEE for decision making of Naval base selection
    Ahmadi
    Herdiawan, Didit
    [J]. DECISION SCIENCE LETTERS, 2021, 10 (02) : 129 - 138
  • [4] Solar PV power plant site selection using a GIS-AHP based approach with application in Saudi Arabia
    Al Garni, Hassan Z.
    Awasthi, Anjali
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 206 : 1225 - 1240
  • [5] Anderluh A Hemmelmayr., 2020, Transportation Research Procedia, V46, P77, DOI [10.1016/j.trpro.2020.03.166, DOI 10.1016/J.TRPRO.2020.03.166]
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2011, WORKING PAPERS
  • [7] An AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process)/ANP (Analytic Network Process)-based multi-criteria decision approach for the selection of solar-thermal power plant investment projects
    Aragones-Beltran, Pablo
    Chaparro-Gonzalez, Fidel
    Pastor-Ferrando, Juan-Pascual
    Pla-Rubio, Andrea
    [J]. ENERGY, 2014, 66 : 222 - 238
  • [8] Asadabadi Mehdi Rajabi, 2019, Cogent Engineering, V6, DOI 10.1080/23311916.2019.1623153
  • [9] Evaluation of power plants in Turkey using Analytic Network Process (ANP)
    Atmaca, Ediz
    Basar, Hasan Burak
    [J]. ENERGY, 2012, 44 (01) : 555 - 563
  • [10] Multi-tier sustainable global supplier selection using a fuzzy AHP-VIKOR based approach
    Awasthi, Anjali
    Govindan, Kannan
    Gold, Stefan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2018, 195 : 106 - 117