The fibroid registry for outcomes data (FIBROID) for uterine embolization - Short-term outcomes

被引:113
|
作者
Worthington-Kirsch, R
Spies, JB
Myers, ER
Mulgund, J
Mauro, M
Pron, G
Peterson, ED
Goodwin, S
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Ctr Med, Duke Clin Res Inst, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Ctr Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[3] Georgetown Univ, Ctr Med, Dept Radiol, Washington, DC USA
[4] Image Guided Surg Associates, Philadelphia, PA USA
[5] Univ N Carolina, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[6] Univ Toronto, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med, Durham, NC USA
[8] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Radiol Sci, Los Angeles, CA USA
来源
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 2005年 / 106卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.AOG.0000165828.68787.a9
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate the short-term safety of uterine embolization for leiomyomata in a large cohort of patients treated in a variety of clinical settings. Methods: Examining the FIBROID Registry, a multicenter prospective voluntary registry of patients undergoing uterine embolization for leiomyomata, we studied the frequency of adverse events and predictors of adverse events within 30 days of the procedure. We also report on the technical aspects of the procedure, including details of periprocedural care, technique, and short-term recovery. All adverse events were recorded and classified using standard definitions, both in terms of type and severity. Summary statistics were used to describe the data set, and univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine which factors might influence the incidence of adverse events. Results: Of the 3,160 patients enrolled at 72 contributing sites, major in-hospital complications occurred in 0.66%, and postdischarge major events occurred in 4.8% within the first 30 days. The most common adverse event after discharge was inadequate pain relief requiring additional hospital treatment (2.4%). Thirty-one patients required additional surgical intervention within 30 days after treatment, 3 of whom required hysterectomy (0.1%). There were no deaths. Multivariate analysis showed modest increased odds for an adverse event for African Americans, smokers, and those with prior leiomyoma procedures. There were no differences in outcome based on the practice site experience, practice type, or any procedure-related factors. Conclusion: Uterine embolization for leiomyomata is a low-risk procedure with little variability in short-term outcome based on either patient demographics or practice setting.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 59
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Short-term outcomes of uterine artery embolization: Early results of the national CIRREF FIBROID registry.
    Myers, E
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2002, 78 (03) : S65 - S65
  • [2] Prospective data collection of a new procedure by a specialty society: The FIBROID Registry (vol 106, pg 44, 2005) - The fibroid registry for outcomes data (FIBROID) for uterine embolization: Short-term outcomes (vol 106, pg 52, 2005)
    Gemmete, J
    Kim, H
    Siegel, D
    Hovsepian, D
    Ehrman, K
    Shlansky-Goldberg, R
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 106 (04): : 869 - 869
  • [3] Uterine artery embolization for treatment of leiomyomata - Long-term outcomes from the FIBROID registry
    Goodwin, Scott C.
    Spies, James B.
    Worthington-Kirsch, Robert
    Peterson, Eric
    Pron, Gaylene
    Li, Shuang
    Myers, Evan R.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 111 (01): : 22 - 33
  • [4] Intermediate and long-term outcomes following uterine artery fibroid embolization
    Hamoda, H.
    Pepas, L.
    Tasker, F.
    Reidy, J.
    Khalaf, Y.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2015, 191 : 33 - 38
  • [5] Intermediate and long-term outcomes following uterine artery fibroid embolization
    Duvnjak, S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2016, 198 : 153 - 153
  • [6] Outcomes Following Fibroid Expulsion after Uterine Artery Embolization
    Shlansky-Goldberg, Richard D.
    Coryell, Lee
    Stavropoulos, S. William
    Trerotola, Scott O.
    Mondschein, Jeffrey
    Beshara, Mathew
    Butts, Samantha F.
    Sondheimer, Steven
    Tureck, Richard W.
    Rosen, Mark
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2011, 22 (11) : 1586 - 1593
  • [7] Uterine fibroid embolization
    Sasadeusz, KJ
    Andrews, RT
    SEMINARS IN ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 37 (04) : 361 - 370
  • [8] Uterine fibroid embolization
    Smith, SJ
    AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2000, 61 (12) : 3601 - 3607
  • [9] Uterine Fibroid Embolization
    Halpern, Michele
    Jesmajian, Stephen
    Rubin, Michael
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 361 (23): : 2293 - 2294
  • [10] Uterine fibroid embolization
    Baakdah, H
    Tulandi, T
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 48 (02): : 361 - 368