Value of power-to-gas as a flexibility option in integrated electricity and hydrogen markets

被引:50
作者
Li, Xinyu [1 ]
Mulder, Machiel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Fac Econ & Business, NL-9747 AE Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
Power-to-gas; Electricity markets; Hydrogen markets; Sector coupling; Climate Policy; Welfare; ENERGY-STORAGE; ELECTROLYSIS; SYSTEMS; PLANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117863
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
ABS TRACT This paper analyzes the economic potential of Power-to-Gas (PtG) as a source of flexibility in electricity markets with both high shares of renewables and high external demand for hydrogen. The contribution of this paper is that it develops and applies a short-term (hourly) partial equilibrium model of integrated electricity and hydrogen markets, including markets for green certificates, while using a welfare-economic framework to assess the market outcomes. We find that strongly increasing the share of renewable electricity makes electricity prices much more volatile, while the presence of PtG reduces this price volatility. However, a large demand for hydrogen from outside the electricity sector reduces the impact of PtG on the volatility of electricity prices. In a scenario with a high external hydrogen demand, PtG can deliver positive benefits for some groups as it can provide hydrogen at lower costs than Steam Methane Reforming (SMR) during hours when electricity prices are low, but these positive welfare effects are outweighed by the fixed costs of PtG assets plus the costs of replacing a less expensive energy carrier (natural gas) with a more expensive one (hydrogen). Investments in PtG are profitable from a social-welfare perspective when the induced reduction in carbon emissions is valued at 150-750 euro/ton. Hence, at lower carbon prices, PtG can only become a valuable provider of flexibility when installation costs are significantly reduced and conversion efficiencies of electrolysers increased.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 25 条
[11]   Power-to-gas plants and gas turbines for improved wind energy dispatchability: Energy and economic assessment [J].
Guandalini, Giulio ;
Campanari, Stefano ;
Romano, Matteo C. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 147 :117-130
[12]   Optimal Use of Power-to-Gas Energy Storage Systems in an 85% Renewable Energy Scenario [J].
Jentsch, Mareike ;
Trost, Tobias ;
Sterner, Michael .
8TH INTERNATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY STORAGE CONFERENCE AND EXHIBITION (IRES 2013), 2014, 46 :254-261
[13]   A meta-analysis on the price elasticity of energy demand [J].
Labandeira, Xavier ;
Labeaga, Jose M. ;
Lopez-Otero, Xiral .
ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 102 :549-568
[14]   Relevance and costs of large scale underground hydrogen storage in France [J].
Le Duigou, Alain ;
Bader, Anne-Gaelle ;
Lanoix, Jean-Christophe ;
Nadau, Lionel .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2017, 42 (36) :22987-23003
[15]   Geologic storage of hydrogen: Scaling up to meet city transportation demands [J].
Lord, Anna S. ;
Kobos, Peter H. ;
Borns, David J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2014, 39 (28) :15570-15582
[16]  
Mukherjee U, 2016, 2016 THE 4TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SMART ENERGY GRID ENGINEERING (SEGE), P221, DOI 10.1109/SEGE.2016.7589529
[17]  
Parks G, 2014, Hydrogen station compression, storage, and dispensing technical status and costs, DOI DOI 10.13140/RG.2.2.23768.34562
[18]   The welfare and price effects of sector coupling with power-to-gas [J].
Roach, Martin ;
Meeus, Leonardo .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2020, 86
[19]   Future cost and performance of water electrolysis: An expert elicitation study [J].
Schmidt, O. ;
Gambhir, A. ;
Staffell, I. ;
Hawkes, A. ;
Nelson, J. ;
Few, S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2017, 42 (52) :30470-30492
[20]  
Sterner M., 2009, THESIS U KASSEL KASS