Evaluation of tigecycline penetration into colon wall tissue and epithelial lining fluid using a population pharmacokinetic model and Monte Carlo simulation

被引:30
作者
Rubino, Christopher M.
Ma, Lei
Bhavnani, Sujata M.
Korth-Bradley, Joan
Speth, John
Ellis-Grosse, Evelyn
Rodvold, Keith R.
Ambrose, Paul G.
Drusano, George L.
机构
[1] Ordway Res Inst, FIDSA, Inst Clin Pharmacodynam, Albany, NY 12208 USA
[2] Wyeth Res, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] E2g Biopharmaceut Consulting, Downingtown, PA USA
[4] Univ Illinois, Coll Pharm, Chicago, IL USA
[5] Univ Illinois, Coll Med, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
D O I
10.1128/AAC.00065-07
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The objective of these analyses was to assess the penetration of tigecycline into colon wall tissue and epithelial lining fluid (ELF). The analyses included data from subjects without infection (phase 1) and patients with intra-abdominal infections (phase 2/3). Steady-state serum samples were collected from all subjects/ patients (n = 577), while colon wall specimens (n = 23) and ELF specimens (n = 30) were obtained from subjects without infection. Tissue and serum data were simultaneously comodeled by using the BigNPAG program, and a four-compartment, open model with zero-order intravenous input and first-order elimination was employed. To examine the full range of tissue penetration and the associated probabilities of occurrence, a 9,999-subject Monte Carlo simulation was performed with two outputs, one for ELF penetration and one for colon wall tissue penetration. Data were well fit using models described above, with all r(2) values above 0.95. For subjects without infection, the median (5th and 95th percentiles) colon wall and ELF penetration ratios were 1.73 (0.160 and 199) and 1.15 (0.561 and 5.23), respectively. Simulation results predict that tissue penetration varies considerably and likely explain unexpected clinical outcomes for those patients infected with strains at margins of the MIC distribution.
引用
收藏
页码:4085 / 4089
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Use of pharmacodynamic end points in the evaluation of gatifloxacin for the treatment of acute maxillary sinusitis [J].
Ambrose, PG ;
Anon, JB ;
Owen, JS ;
Van Wart, S ;
McPhee, ME ;
Bhavnani, SM ;
Piedmonte, M ;
Jones, RN .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2004, 38 (11) :1513-1520
[2]  
[Anonymous], ANTIMICROBIAL PHARMA
[3]   MICROLAVAGE - A TECHNIQUE FOR DETERMINING THE VOLUME OF EPITHELIAL LINING FLUID [J].
BALDWIN, DR ;
WISE, R ;
ANDREWS, JM ;
HONEYBOURNE, D .
THORAX, 1991, 46 (09) :658-662
[4]   Steady-state serum and intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tigecycline [J].
Conte, JE ;
Golden, JA ;
Kelly, MG ;
Zurlinden, E .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2005, 25 (06) :523-529
[5]  
DARGENIO DZ, ADAPT 2 USERS GUIDE
[6]   A population pharmacokinetic analysis of the penetration of the prostate by levofloxacin [J].
Drusano, GL ;
Preston, SL ;
Van Guilder, M ;
North, D ;
Gombert, M ;
Oefelein, M ;
Boccumini, L ;
Weisinger, B ;
Corrado, M ;
Kahn, J .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2000, 44 (08) :2046-2051
[7]   Levofloxacin penetration into epithelial lining fluid as determined by population pharmacokinetic modeling and Monte Carlo simulation [J].
Drusano, GL ;
Preston, SL ;
Gotfried, MH ;
Danziger, LH ;
Rodvold, KA .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2002, 46 (02) :586-589
[8]   PHARMACODYNAMICS OF A FLUOROQUINOLONE ANTIMICROBIAL AGENT IN A NEUTROPENIC RAT MODEL OF PSEUDOMONAS SEPSIS [J].
DRUSANO, GL ;
JOHNSON, DE ;
ROSEN, M ;
STANDIFORD, HC .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1993, 37 (03) :483-490
[9]   ANALYSIS OF VANCOMYCIN ENTRY INTO PULMONARY LINING FLUID BY BRONCHOALVEOLAR LAVAGE IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS [J].
LAMER, C ;
DEBECO, V ;
SOLER, P ;
CALVAT, S ;
FAGON, JY ;
DOMBRET, MC ;
FARINOTTI, R ;
CHASTRE, J ;
GIBERT, C .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1993, 37 (02) :281-286
[10]   Pharmacokinetics of tigecycline after single and multiple doses in healthy subjects [J].
Muralidharan, G ;
Micalizzi, M ;
Speth, J ;
Raible, D ;
Troy, S .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2005, 49 (01) :220-229