Teamwork: Assessment of teamwork competence in higher education

被引:6
作者
Navarro, Jose [1 ]
Bosch, Josep Lluis [2 ]
Palacin, Maria [1 ]
Sole, Marina [3 ]
Berger, Rita [1 ]
Leiva, David [1 ]
Ceppi, Francesca [1 ]
Castellano, Julia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Barcelona, Dept Social Psychol & Quantitat Psychol, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Univ Barcelona, Dept Sociol, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Univ Barcelona, Dept Econ, Barcelona, Spain
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE HEAD'17 - 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HIGHER EDUCATION ADVANCES | 2017年
关键词
Teamwork; aggregated team measures; competence assessment; higher education;
D O I
10.4995/HEAd17.2017.5507
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Teamwork is both a competence highly demanded among workers and an academic field with an extensive specialized literature. Based on this knowledge that comes from the study of organizational behavior, this communication presents a model to understand teamwork in higher education settings. The theoretical model considers structural components (i.e., task interdependence and task uncertainty), processes (i.e., team development and team climate for learning) and results (i.e., team effectiveness). Moreover, an assessment tool (and attitudinal questionnaire with 42 items-Likert scale with a range from 1 to 7) is also presented to measure these critical components that can allow us to distinguish between effective and ineffective teams in higher education. Preliminary results of the application of these tools to 18 team students show good consistency values of the scales used being able to distinguish among teams. Additionally, we propose a procedure to obtain aggregated measures per group from the members' responses considering the degree of agreement among them.
引用
收藏
页码:1024 / 1032
页数:9
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Bliese P.D., 2000, Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations, P349, DOI DOI 10.12691/EDUCATION-3-1-14
  • [2] Brodbeck F. C., 2010, 20101 WOP
  • [3] GROUPS IN CONTEXT - A MODEL OF TASK GROUP EFFECTIVENESS
    GLADSTEIN, DL
    [J]. ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1984, 29 (04) : 499 - 517
  • [4] Hackman J.R., 1987, Handbook of organizational behavior
  • [5] Kozlowski S.W., 2003, COMPREHENSIVE HDB PS, V12, P333, DOI [10.1002/9781118133880.hop212017, DOI 10.1002/0471264385.WEI1214]
  • [6] Criteria for assessing the level of group development (LGD) of work groups - Groupness, entitativity, and groupality as theoretical perspectives
    Meneses, Rocio
    Ortega, Raul
    Navarro, Jose
    de Quijano, Santiago D.
    [J]. SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 2008, 39 (04) : 492 - 514
  • [7] Meneses R, 2015, PAPEL PSICOL, V36, P224
  • [8] Navarro J, 2011, PAPEL PSICOL, V32, P17
  • [9] What distinguish teams from social aggregates? A tool to assess the group development
    Navarro, Jose
    Meneses, Rocio
    Miralles, Cibeles
    Moreno, Diana I.
    Loureiro, Vania
    [J]. ANALES DE PSICOLOGIA, 2015, 31 (03): : 921 - 929
  • [10] Salas E, 2015, TEAM TRAINING ESSENTIALS: A RESEARCH-BASED GUIDE, P1