Process and reality in information systems benefit analysis

被引:19
作者
Changchit, C [1 ]
Joshi, KD
Lederer, AL
机构
[1] Univ Kentucky, Carol M Gatton Coll Business Adm, Sch Management, Lexington, KY 40506 USA
[2] Washington State Univ, Coll Business & Econ, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
关键词
information systems benefit analysis; cost-benefit analysis; information systems planning; information systems management;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2575.1998.00031.x
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
The identification of the potential benefits of a proposed information system project is a very challenging and important task. However, little research describes how this is actually carried out. The objective of this research was to answer the core question: how do organizations identify the expected benefits of proposed IS projects? To accomplish this objective, the authors studied 24 projects by interviewing 20 subjects from 13 organizations. Based on these interviews, a model of the benefit identification process was formulated showing it to be a set of loosely defined, overlapping, iterative activities. The study suggests that, despite great uncertainty about the potential benefits, proposers were compelled to use the benefit identification process to persuade the organization to be committed to the project. This effort to build commitment under great uncertainty may contribute to the overstatement or understatement of expected benefits. The study offers managers an understanding of the process and guidance for carrying it out. If also suggests that future researchers validate the model, use it to help identify best practices and test related hypotheses. (C) 1998 Blackwell Science Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 162
页数:18
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], MIS Q
[2]   STRUCTURED SYSTEMS-ANALYSIS AND DESIGN METHOD (SSADM) [J].
ASHWORTH, CM .
INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 1988, 30 (03) :153-163
[3]  
*AUD COMM, 1994, HIGH RISK HIGH POT M
[4]   THE USE OF DECISION CRITERIA IN SELECTING INFORMATION-SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENTS [J].
BACON, CJ .
MIS QUARTERLY, 1992, 16 (03) :335-353
[5]  
Bonoma T. V, 1983, 9585142 HARV U GRAD
[6]   THE PRODUCTIVITY PARADOX OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY [J].
BRYNJOLFSSON, E .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 1993, 36 (12) :67-77
[7]  
CHANGCHIT C, 1997, P DECISION SCI I ANN, V2, P825
[8]  
Checkland P., 1993, SYSTEMS THINKING SYS
[9]  
Checkland P. B., 1989, Human Systems Management, V8, P273
[10]  
CHEUNG JK, 1991, J INFORMATION SY SPR, P36