Traditional Chinese patent medicine for prophylactic treatment of migraine: a meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials

被引:15
作者
Xiao, Y. [1 ,2 ]
Yuan, L. [2 ]
Liu, Y. [3 ]
Sun, X. [2 ]
Cheng, J. [1 ,2 ]
Wang, T. [1 ,2 ]
Li, F. [1 ,2 ]
Luo, R. [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, X. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Southern Med Univ, Nanfang Hosp, Dept Tradit Chinese Med, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Southern Med Univ, Sch Tradit Chinese Med, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Guangzhou Univ Chinese Med, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Rheumat Dis, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
meta-analysis; migraine; prophylactic treatment; traditional Chinese patent medicine; UNITED-STATES; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; AMITRIPTYLINE; PREVENTION; PREVALENCE; HEADACHE;
D O I
10.1111/ene.12581
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and purposeA large number of traditional Chinese patent medicines (TCPMs) are widely used to treat migraine in China. However, it is uncertain whether there is robust evidence on the effects of TCPMs for migraine. A meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TCPMs in patients with migraine. MethodsComprehensive searches were conducted on the Medline database, Cochrane Library, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure database, the Chinese Biomedical Literature database and the Wanfang database up to December 2013. Summary estimates, including 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were calculated for frequency of migraine attacks, response rate and headache intensity. ResultsA total of seven trials including 582 participants with migraine met the selection criteria. TCPM was significantly more likely to reduce the frequency of migraine attacks compared with placebo (standardized mean difference-0.54; 95% CI-0.72, -0.36; P<0.001). TCPM was associated with an improvement of response rate compared with placebo (summary relative risk 4.63, 95% CI2.74, 7.80, P<0.001; therapeutic gain24.1%; number needed to treat 4.1). Headache intensity was attenuated by TCPM compared with placebo (standardized mean difference-1.33; 95% CI-1.79, -0.87; P<0.001). The adverse events of TCPM were no different from those of placebo. ConclusionTCPMs are effective and well tolerated in the prophylactic treatment of migraine.
引用
收藏
页码:361 / 368
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Perimenstrual migraines and their response to preventive therapy with topiramate [J].
Allais, Gianni ;
Sanchez del Rio, Margarita ;
Diener, Hans-Christoph ;
Benedetto, Chiara ;
Pfeil, Joop ;
Schaeuble, Barbara ;
van Oene, Joop .
CEPHALALGIA, 2011, 31 (02) :152-160
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, CHIN J NEUROL, DOI DOI 10.3760/J.ISSN:1006-7876.2001.05.012
[3]   Venlafaxine versus amitriptyline in the prophylactic treatment of migraine: randomized, double-blind, crossover study [J].
Bulut, S ;
Berilgen, MS ;
Baran, A ;
Tekatas, A ;
Atmaca, M ;
Mungen, B .
CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2004, 107 (01) :44-48
[4]   Topiramate Versus Amitriptyline in Migraine Prevention: A 26-Week, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Parallel-Group Noninferiority Trial in Adult Migraineurs [J].
Dodick, David W. ;
Freitag, Fred ;
Banks, James ;
Saper, Joel ;
Xiang, Jim ;
Rupnow, Marcia ;
Biondi, David ;
Greenberg, Steven J. ;
Hulihan, Joseph .
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2009, 31 (03) :542-559
[5]   Basic mechanisms of migraine and its acute treatment [J].
Edvinsson, Lars ;
Villalon, Carlos M. ;
MaassenVanDenBrink, Antoinette .
PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2012, 136 (03) :319-333
[6]  
Fu HJ, 2008, HEILONG JIANG J MED, V32, P531
[7]   Pathophysiology of migraine - New insights [J].
Hargreaves, RJ ;
Shepheard, SL .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1999, 26 :S12-S19
[8]   The Burden of Migraine in the United States: Current and Emerging Perspectives on Disease Management and Economic Analysis [J].
Hazard, Elisabeth ;
Munakata, Julie ;
Bigal, Marcelo E. ;
Rupnow, Marcia F. T. ;
Lipton, Richard B. .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2009, 12 (01) :55-64
[9]  
He FY, 2005, J LUZHOU MED COLL, V28, P422
[10]  
Hu J., 2012, CHIN J CLIN RATION D, V5, P66, DOI [10.15887/j.cnki.13-1389/r.2012.03.007, DOI 10.15887/J.CNKI.13-1389/R.2012.03.007]