Waste Recycling under Take-back and Tax/Subsidy Mechanisms

被引:0
|
作者
Tsai, Tsung-Hsiu [1 ]
Wu, Shih-Jye [2 ]
Hwang, Hong [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Kaohsiung, Dept Appl Econ, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[2] Natl Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Polit Econ, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[3] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Econ, Taipei, Taiwan
来源
E-BUSINESS, MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS | 2011年 / 3卷
关键词
waste management; extended producer responsibility; recycling rate; recycling market; output tax and recycling subsidy; DISPOSAL; POLICIES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In the implementation of extended producer responsibility (EPR) principle on waste management, some countries use a take-back mandate mechanism in which manufacturers bear responsibility to recycle their products till they reach a mandated recycling rate level. Other countries follow a tax/subsidy mechanism in which manufacturers pay an advance disposal fees; the government intervenes in transferring the payment received from manufacturers to subsidize the recycling sector. The purpose of this paper is to compare the relative performance of these two EPR mechanisms on the waste recycling rate. We found that when the recycling technology is relatively efficient, the recycling rate is higher under the tax/subsidy mechanism than the take back mandate mechanism. This result is reversed when the recycling technology becomes less efficient.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Study on Charging Model of Third-party Take-back to Mobile Phone Producer Based on Extended Producer Responsibility
    Xu, Zhiduan
    2008 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SERVICE SYSTEMS AND SERVICE MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, : 518 - 522
  • [32] Research on Investment Decision of Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling Technology from the Perspective of Government Subsidy
    Shen, Ziwei
    Zhang, Jing
    Yu, Minjiu
    Tan, Ruwen
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2022, 2022
  • [33] EXTENDING PRODUCER RESPONSIBILITY: FRAMEWORK TO INCORPORATE LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT IN AIRCRAFT PRELIMINARY DESIGN BASED ON TAKE-BACK POLICIES
    Ribeiro, Junior Sousa
    Gomes, Jefferson de Oliveira
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIVE DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING (ICIDM), 2014, : 294 - 299
  • [34] A closed-loop supply chain inventory model with stochastic demand, hybrid production, carbon emissions, and take-back incentives
    Jauhari, Wakhid Ahmad
    Pujawan, I. Nyoman
    Suef, Mokh
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 320
  • [35] International best practices for e-waste take back and policy interventions for India
    Sheoran, Monika
    Das Gupta, Devashish
    FACILITIES, 2024, 42 (3/4) : 376 - 404
  • [36] Recycling price and service of a platform-based WEEE reverse supply chain under government subsidy
    Wan, Nana
    CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2024, : 1333 - 1348
  • [37] Emissions reduction and pricing of supply chain under cap-and-trade and subsidy mechanisms
    Miao, Wenqing
    Zhu, Guohua
    Shen, Bingliang
    Kong, Demin
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (04):
  • [38] Exploring the optimal reverse supply chain for e-waste treatment under Chinese government subsidy
    Wang, Juntao
    Li, Wenhua
    Mishima, Nozomu
    Adachi, Tsuyoshi
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2022, 137 : 128 - 138
  • [39] Policy analysis on recycling fund management for E-waste in Taiwan under uncertainty
    Shih, Hsu-Shih
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 143 : 345 - 355
  • [40] Competition and cooperation between green and non-green supply chains under Government's subsidy and carbon tax to consumers
    Shang, Wenfang
    Han, Zaixin
    Wei, Wei
    Li, Tao
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2025, 203