Waste Recycling under Take-back and Tax/Subsidy Mechanisms

被引:0
|
作者
Tsai, Tsung-Hsiu [1 ]
Wu, Shih-Jye [2 ]
Hwang, Hong [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Kaohsiung, Dept Appl Econ, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[2] Natl Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Polit Econ, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[3] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Econ, Taipei, Taiwan
来源
E-BUSINESS, MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS | 2011年 / 3卷
关键词
waste management; extended producer responsibility; recycling rate; recycling market; output tax and recycling subsidy; DISPOSAL; POLICIES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In the implementation of extended producer responsibility (EPR) principle on waste management, some countries use a take-back mandate mechanism in which manufacturers bear responsibility to recycle their products till they reach a mandated recycling rate level. Other countries follow a tax/subsidy mechanism in which manufacturers pay an advance disposal fees; the government intervenes in transferring the payment received from manufacturers to subsidize the recycling sector. The purpose of this paper is to compare the relative performance of these two EPR mechanisms on the waste recycling rate. We found that when the recycling technology is relatively efficient, the recycling rate is higher under the tax/subsidy mechanism than the take back mandate mechanism. This result is reversed when the recycling technology becomes less efficient.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Differentiated subsidy mechanism for promoting construction and demolition waste recycling
    Yuan, Hongping
    He, Lingling
    Wu, Huanyu
    Zuo, Jian
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 405
  • [22] EFFECTS OF TAKE-BACK LEGISLATION ON PRICING AND COORDINATION IN A CLOSED-LOOP SUPPLY CHAIN
    Zheng, Benrong
    Hong, Xianpei
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND MANAGEMENT OPTIMIZATION, 2022, 18 (03) : 1603 - 1627
  • [23] Take-back regulation policy on closed loop supply chains: Single or double targets?
    Chen Xintong
    Li Bangyi
    Li Zonghuo
    Mark Goh
    Wei Shanting
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 283
  • [24] Patient participation in a clinic-based community pharmacy medication take-back program
    Lystlund, Stefanie
    Stevens, Eric
    Planas, Lourdes G.
    Marcy, Todd R.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION, 2014, 54 (03) : 280 - 284
  • [25] The joint tax-subsidy mechanism incorporating extended producer responsibility in a manufacturing-recycling system
    Chang, Xiangyun
    Wu, Jie
    Li, Tian
    Fan, Ti-Jun
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 210 : 821 - 836
  • [26] Optimal decisions of construction and demolition waste recycling based on reference green effect under different subsidy models
    Zheng, Jiayuan
    Tan, Ruwen
    Yu, Minjiu
    Tang, Zihan
    Zhang, Jing
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 196
  • [27] OPTIMAL SOLID WASTE TAX POLICY WITH CENTRALIZED RECYCLING
    Kinnaman, Thomas C.
    NATIONAL TAX JOURNAL, 2010, 63 (02) : 237 - 251
  • [28] Sustaining the advancement of new energy vehicles in the post-subsidy era: Carbon quota mechanisms and subsidy mechanisms for recycling of used batteries
    Guo, Zulong
    Du, Yushen
    Zhao, Yuntong
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2024, 45 : 158 - 176
  • [29] Managing a closed-loop supply chain with take-back legislation and consumer preference for green design
    Li, Bangyi
    Wang, Yue
    Wang, Zhe
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 282
  • [30] Predictors of Safe Prescription Opioid Storage and Participation in Drug Take-Back Events: Results from a Statewide Survey
    Broman, Michael J.
    Ellis, Jennifer D.
    Victor, Grant A.
    Kollin, Rachel
    Pasman, Emily
    Lister, Jamey J.
    Resko, Stella M.
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2021, 46 (05) : 1000 - 1007