Waste Recycling under Take-back and Tax/Subsidy Mechanisms

被引:0
|
作者
Tsai, Tsung-Hsiu [1 ]
Wu, Shih-Jye [2 ]
Hwang, Hong [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Kaohsiung, Dept Appl Econ, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[2] Natl Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Polit Econ, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[3] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Econ, Taipei, Taiwan
来源
E-BUSINESS, MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS | 2011年 / 3卷
关键词
waste management; extended producer responsibility; recycling rate; recycling market; output tax and recycling subsidy; DISPOSAL; POLICIES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In the implementation of extended producer responsibility (EPR) principle on waste management, some countries use a take-back mandate mechanism in which manufacturers bear responsibility to recycle their products till they reach a mandated recycling rate level. Other countries follow a tax/subsidy mechanism in which manufacturers pay an advance disposal fees; the government intervenes in transferring the payment received from manufacturers to subsidize the recycling sector. The purpose of this paper is to compare the relative performance of these two EPR mechanisms on the waste recycling rate. We found that when the recycling technology is relatively efficient, the recycling rate is higher under the tax/subsidy mechanism than the take back mandate mechanism. This result is reversed when the recycling technology becomes less efficient.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Stakeholder Perspectives on E-Waste Take-Back Legislation
    Atasu, Atalay
    Ozdemir, Oznur
    Van Wassenhove, Luk N.
    PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2013, 22 (02) : 382 - 396
  • [2] Comparison of three E-Waste take-back policies
    Shan, Feifei
    Xiao, Wenli
    Yang, Feng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2021, 242
  • [3] Modeling and assessment of e-waste take-back strategies in India
    Dwivedy, Maheshwar
    Suchde, Pratik
    Mittal, R. K.
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2015, 96 : 11 - 18
  • [4] An Operations Perspective on Product Take-Back Legislation for E-Waste: Theory, Practice, and Research Needs
    Atasu, Atalay
    Van Wassenhove, Luk N.
    PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2012, 21 (03) : 407 - 422
  • [5] The Effects of Patent Extension and Take-Back on Green
    Shi, Tianqin
    Petruzzi, Nicholas C.
    Chhajed, Dilip
    M&SOM-MANUFACTURING & SERVICE OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2022, 24 (02) : 810 - 826
  • [6] Competition and cooperation in a remanufacturing system with take-back requirement
    Jung, Ki Seung
    Hwang, Hark
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, 2011, 22 (03) : 427 - 433
  • [7] Strategic take-back programs when consumers have heterogeneous environmental preferences
    Forlin, Valeria
    Scholz, Eva-Maria
    RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2020, 60
  • [8] Remanufacturing with random yield in the presence of the take-back regulation
    Xu, Jie
    Luo, Chunlin
    Ng, C. T.
    Feng, Xuehao
    Cheng, T. C. E.
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 168
  • [9] Unused medicine take-back programmes: a systematic review
    Wang, Leong Seng
    Aziz, Zoriah
    Wang, Ee Syuen
    Chik, Zamri
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2024, 17 (01)
  • [10] Medication take-back programs in Qatar: Parental perceptions
    Hendaus, Mohamed A.
    Darwish, Shereen
    Saleh, Manar
    Mostafa, Omar
    Eltayeb, Ahmed
    Al-Amri, Mohammed
    Siddiqui, Faisal J.
    Alhammadi, Ahmed
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY MEDICINE AND PRIMARY CARE, 2021, 10 (07) : 2697 - 2702