Impact of Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Diagnostic Performance in Screening Breast MRI

被引:19
作者
Sippo, Dorothy A. [1 ]
Rutledge, Geoffrey M. [1 ,3 ]
Mercaldo, Sarah F. [1 ]
Burk, Kristine S. [1 ,4 ]
Edmonds, Christine E. [1 ]
Dang, Pragya A. [2 ]
Lehman, Constance D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Avon Comprehens Breast Evaluat Ctr, Wang Ambulatory Care Bldg,Suite 240,15 Parkman St, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Radiol, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] TRA Med Imaging, 1304 Fawcett Ave,Suite 100, Tacoma, WA 98402 USA
[4] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Radiol, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER COHORT; RESONANCE-IMAGING USE; FIBROGLANDULAR TISSUE; FAMILIAL RISK; CANCER; WOMEN; MAMMOGRAPHY; ACCURACY; PATTERNS; DENSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2019.06.020
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives: To evaluate the impact of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on diagnostic performance in screening breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Materials and Methods: Consecutive screening breast MRIs performed at our institution from 2011 to 2014 were reviewed in a HIPAA-compliant manner with institutional review board approval. BPE was extracted from radiology reports and examinations grouped into minimal/mild (lower) or moderate/marked (higher) BPE. Performance measures were compared between the two groups with Pearson's χ2 test and with logistic regression to adjust for possible confounders of age, screening indication, mammographic density, available prior MRI, and examination year, using lower BPE as the reference group. Results: For 4686 screening MRIs performed in 2446 women, BPE was reported as minimal or mild for 3975 (85%) examinations and moderate or marked for 711(15%). Following logistic regression to adjust for multiple confounders, abnormal interpretation rate (AIR) significantly differed between the two BPE groups. AIR was 13% (89/711) in the higher BPE group versus 7% (295/3975) in the lower BPE group with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.37 (95% confidence interval: 1.03, 1.82). After adjustment, all other performance metrics, including cancer detection rate, positive predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity did not significantly differ between the two BPE groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Higher BPE on screening MRI is associated with higher abnormal interpretation rate, with no impact on cancer detection rate, sensitivity, or specificity. © 2019 The Association of University Radiologists
引用
收藏
页码:663 / 671
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System
[2]   Fast and Noninvasive Characterization of Suspicious Lesions Detected at Breast Cancer X-Ray Screening: Capability of Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging with MIPs [J].
Bickelhaupt, Sebastian ;
Laun, Frederik B. ;
Tesdorff, Jana ;
Lederer, Wolfgang ;
Daniel, Heidi ;
Stieber, Anne ;
Delorme, Stefan ;
Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter .
RADIOLOGY, 2016, 278 (03) :689-697
[3]   Cancellation of MR Imaging-guided Breast Biopsy Due to Lesion Nonvisualization: Frequency and Follow-Up [J].
Brennan, Sandra B. ;
Sung, Janice S. ;
Dershaw, D. David ;
Liberman, Laura ;
Morris, Elizabeth A. .
RADIOLOGY, 2011, 261 (01) :92-99
[4]  
Carney PA, 2003, ANN INTERN MED, V138, P168, DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-138-3-200302040-00008
[5]  
Dehkordy Soudabeh Fazeli, 2016, J Am Coll Radiol, V13, pR53, DOI 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.09.027
[6]   Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Breast MRI: Impact on Diagnostic Performance [J].
DeMartini, Wendy B. ;
Liu, Franklin ;
Peacock, Sue ;
Eby, Peter R. ;
Gutierrez, Robert L. ;
Lehman, Constance D. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 198 (04) :W373-W380
[7]   Are Qualitative Assessments of Background Parenchymal Enhancement, Amount of Fibroglandular Tissue on MR Images, and Mammographic Density Associated with Breast Cancer Risk? [J].
Dontchos, Brian N. ;
Rahbar, Habib ;
Partridge, Savannah C. ;
Korde, Larissa A. ;
Lam, Diana L. ;
Scheel, John R. ;
Peacock, Sue ;
Lehman, Constance D. .
RADIOLOGY, 2015, 276 (02) :371-380
[8]   Background Parenchymal Enhancement at Breast MR Imaging: Normal Patterns, Diagnostic Challenges, and Potential for False-Positive and False-Negative Interpretation [J].
Giess, Catherine S. ;
Yeh, Eren D. ;
Raza, Sughra ;
Birdwell, Robyn L. .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2014, 34 (01) :234-U293
[9]   Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Baseline Screening Breast MRI: Impact on Biopsy Rate and Short-Interval Follow-Up [J].
Hambly, Niamh M. ;
Liberman, Laura ;
Dershaw, D. David ;
Brennan, Sandra ;
Morris, Elizabeth A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2011, 196 (01) :218-224
[10]   Impact of Tamoxifen on Amount of Fibroglandular Tissue, Background Parenchymal Enhancement, and Cysts on Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging [J].
King, Valencia ;
Kaplan, Jennifer ;
Pike, Malcolm C. ;
Liberman, Laura ;
Dershaw, D. David ;
Lee, Carol H. ;
Brooks, Jennifer D. ;
Morris, Elizabeth A. .
BREAST JOURNAL, 2012, 18 (06) :527-534