The non-native phonetic perception mechanism utilized by bilinguals with different L2 proficiency levels

被引:3
|
作者
Liang, Lijuan [1 ]
Chen, Baoguo [2 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Univ Foreign Studies, Ctr Linguist & Appl Linguist, Bilingual Cognit & Dev Lab, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Normal Univ, Fac Psychol, Beijing Key Lab Appl Expt Psychol, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Pre-attentive non-native phonetic discrimination; L2; proficiency; individual differences; perceptual plasticity; mismatch negativity (MMN); INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; SPEECH-PERCEPTION; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; BRAIN STRUCTURE; 2ND-LANGUAGE; ACQUISITION; AGE; DISCRIMINATION; PREDICTS; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1177/13670069211058275
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Aims: The present study investigated whether bilinguals differing in L2 proficiency are different in their non-native phonetic perception mechanism. Methodology: An event-related potential (ERP) experiment was conducted, in which high and low L2 proficiency bilinguals were asked to focus their attention on a muted film while listening pre-attentively to phoneme contrasts arranged in the Oddball paradigm. Non-native and native phonetic conditions were investigated in two separate blocks. Data and analysis: The mean amplitudes of the ERP epochs time-locked to the onset of phonemes were analyzed within four consecutive time windows: 50-150 ms, 150-250 ms, 250-350 ms, and 350-600 ms. Repeated measures analyses were performed on the following factors: phonetic condition (non-native vs. native) x deviancy (standard vs. deviant) x brain region (frontal vs. parietal) x proficiency (high vs. low). Phonetic condition, deviancy, and brain region were within-subjects factors, whereas proficiency was a between-subjects factor. Findings: In the non-native phonetic condition, a deviancy effect in the form of mismatch negativity (MMN) and late discriminative negativity (LDN) ERP components was observed in bilinguals with high L2 proficiency, whereas the P3b and late positive component (LPC) were found in those with low L2 proficiency. In the native phonetic condition, the two proficiency groups were the same in the deviancy effect as manifested by their similar brain responses in the form of the MMN component. Originality: This was the first study to take native phonetic condition into consideration while investigating the relationship between L2 proficiency and non-native phonetic discrimination. Significance/implications: The current findings suggest that high L2 proficiency might be related to faster involuntary phonetic discrimination and efficient high-level phonetic evaluation, whereas low L2 proficiency bilinguals may need to rely on additional memory processing. Findings of this study provide more evidence for the perceptual plasticity in pre-attentive non-native phonetic processing as a function of L2 proficiency.
引用
收藏
页码:368 / 386
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Pre-attentive L2 Orthographic Perception Mechanism Utilized by Bilinguals with Different Proficiency Levels
    Liang, Lijuan
    Smith, Michael Sharwood
    Chondrogianni, Vasiliki
    Chen, Baoguo
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 8
  • [2] Aging and non-native speech perception: A phonetic training study
    Tamminen, Henna
    Kujala, Teija
    Naatanen, Risto
    Peltola, Maija S.
    NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2021, 740
  • [3] The influence of non-native language proficiency on speech perception perfomance
    Kilman, Lisa
    Zekveld, Adriana
    Hallgren, Mathias
    Ronnberg, Jerker
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 5
  • [4] L2 processing of filled gaps Non-native brain activity not modulated by proficiency and working memory
    Dong, Zhiyin Renee
    Han, Chao
    Hestvik, Arild
    Hermon, Gabriella
    LINGUISTIC APPROACHES TO BILINGUALISM, 2023, 13 (06) : 767 - 800
  • [5] A structural relationship model for resilience, L2 learning motivation, and L2 proficiency at different proficiency levels
    Danesh, Javad
    Shahnazari, Mohammadtaghi
    LEARNING AND MOTIVATION, 2020, 72
  • [6] Cross-language Perception of Non-native Tonal Contrasts: Effects of Native Phonological and Phonetic Influences
    So, Connie K.
    Best, Catherine T.
    LANGUAGE AND SPEECH, 2010, 53 : 273 - 293
  • [7] Comparing non-native and native speech: Are L2 productions more variable?
    Xie, Xin
    Jaeger, T. Florian
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2020, 147 (05) : 3322 - 3347
  • [8] Individual differences in phonetic cue use in production and perception of a non-native sound contrast
    Schertz, Jessamyn
    Cho, Taehong
    Lotto, Andrew
    Warner, Natasha
    JOURNAL OF PHONETICS, 2015, 52 : 183 - 204
  • [9] The effects of non-native listeners' L1 background and L2 proficiency on the perception of foreign accent for pitch-manipulated native and Chinese accented English speech
    Xue, Xiaojiao
    Lee, Joo-Kyeong
    LINGUISTIC RESEARCH, 2014, 31 (02) : 275 - 303
  • [10] The Effects of High and Low Variability Phonetic Training on the Perception and Production of English Vowels /e/-/æ/ by Cantonese ESL Learners with High and Low L2 Proficiency Levels
    Wong, Janice Wing Sze
    15TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SPEECH COMMUNICATION ASSOCIATION (INTERSPEECH 2014), VOLS 1-4, 2014, : 524 - 528